Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:22:50.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compressibility effects on the structural evolution of transitional high-speed planar wakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2016

Jean-Pierre Hickey*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario K7K 7B4, Canada
Fazle Hussain
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
Xiaohua Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario K7K 7B4, Canada
*
†Present address: Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. Email address for correspondence: jean-pierre.hickey@uwaterloo.ca

Abstract

The compressibility effects on the structural evolution of the transitional high-speed planar wake are studied. The relative Mach number ( $Ma_{r}$ ) of the laminar base flow modifies two fundamental features of planar wake transition: (i) the characteristic length scale defined by the most unstable linear mode; and (ii) the domain of influence of the structures within the staggered two-dimensional vortex array. Linear stability results reveal a reduced growth (approximately 30 % reduction up to $Ma_{r}=2.0$ ) and a quasilinear increase of the wavelength of the most unstable, two-dimensional instability mode (approximately 20 % longer over the same $Ma_{r}$ range) with increasing $Ma$ . The primary wavelength defines the length scale imposed on the emerging transitional structures; naturally, a longer wavelength results in rollers with a greater streamwise separation and hence also larger circulation. A reduction of the growth rate and an increase of the principal wavelength results in a greater ellipticity of the emerging rollers. Compressibility effects also modify the domain of influence of the transitional structures through an increased cross-wake and inhibited streamwise communication as characteristic paths between rollers are deflected due to local $Ma$  gradients. The reduced streamwise domain of influence impedes roller pairing and, for a sufficiently large relative $Ma$ , pairing is completely suppressed. Thus, we observe an increased two-dimensionality with increasing Mach number: directly contrasting the increasing three-dimensional effects in high-speed mixing layers. Temporally evolving direct numerical simulations conducted at $Ma=0.8$ and 2.0, for Reynolds numbers up to 3000, support the physical insight gained from linear stability and vortex dynamics studies.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of the numerical simulations of the transitional wake. The ${\it\eta}/{\rm\Delta}x|_{min}$ represents the minimal value over the domain, during the entire transitional simulation.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Influence of compressibility and viscosity on the maximal growth rate of the instability modes (two-dimensional, anti-symmetric mode). The maximal exponential growth for Reynolds numbers of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 are compared with the inviscid results by Chen et al. (1990). The streamwise wavenumber of the most unstable mode (squares) is shown on the right-hand side.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Eigenvectors of the most unstable mode at $Re=10\,000$ at $Ma=1.92$ (${\it\alpha}=0.239$, ${\it\beta}=0.264$). The real (red line, dashed-dot), imaginary (blue line, dashed) and the magnitude (black line, full) are presented for $\hat{u}$ (a), $\hat{v}$ (b) and $\hat{{\it\rho}}$ (c).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Influence of compressibility and viscosity on the varicose (two- and three-dimensional, symmetric perturbation) mode in the high-speed wake. The viscosity has a strong stabilizing effect on the growth (top). The streamwise and spanwise wavenumbers of the most unstable symmetric mode for $Re=10\,000$ are presented along with the corresponding angle of the optimal disturbance.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Propagation path of an omnidirectional acoustic disturbance in laminar wake (Gaussian profile shown in a,b) at $Ma_{r}=0.0$, 0.5 and 1.0 (rows top to bottom) for a source at the upper inflection point of the mean velocity profile (a,c,e) and at the centreline (b,d,f). The contour lines represent the wavefronts. The dashed vertical lines represent the streamwise locations of signal intensity measurements in figure 5.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Relative intensity profile of an omnidirectional acoustic source at $(x/b,y/b)=(0,0.5)$ at various streamwise locations for a free-stream Mach number of 0 (solid line), 0.5 (dashed line) and 1.0 (dotted line): (a) $x/b=0.5$; (b) $x/b=1.25$; (c) $x/b=2.0$. The streamwise locations are identified in figure 4(a,c,e) by dashed vertical lines.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Integrated acoustic energy crossing the wake centreplane and angle with the centreplane of the peak intensity (a). Normalized acoustic intensity distribution along the centreplane (b) from an omnidirectional source located at the wake half-width.

Figure 7

Figure 7. The Mach number effect on the zone of influence for a receiver located at (0,0): (a) $Ma=0$; (b) $Ma=0.5$; (c) $Ma=2.0$. The isocontour lines represent the intensity of the acoustic signal at the receiver point.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Evolution of the relative Mach number (a) and of the maximal turbulent Mach number (b). The dashed lines represent the $Re=1500$ simulations.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Evolution of the maximal Favre-averaged normalized Reynolds stresses. The dashed lines represent $Re=1500$ cases for $Ma=0.3$, 0.8, 1.2 and 2.0.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Normalized turbulent kinetic energy budget terms during transition at the peak $\langle vv\rangle$ ((a) $Ma=0.8$ at $t=50$; $Ma=2.0$ at $t=80$) and at the approximate peak $\langle uu\rangle$ ((b) $Ma=0.8$ at $t=80$; $Ma=2.0$ at $t=122$). The normalization parameter is $U_{0}^{3}/b$. Since the flow is not in an equilibrium state, the sum of the energy budget is not expected to be null. The figures provide a snapshot-averaged value of the energy budget, the lack of time averaging results in the non-smooth profile of the transport term.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Evolution of the normalized cross-wake location of the maximum turbulent kinetic energy (a). The horizontal lines correspond to the far-wake locations of the maximum TKE for $Ma=0.8$ and 2.0 which was interpolated from the experimental data by Bonnet et al. (1991, figure 3). The evolution of the location of the maximum density fluctuations (b).

Figure 12

Figure 12. Profile of the normalized turbulent kinetic energy at three instances during the early stages of transition for $Ma=0.8$ (a) and 2.0 (b).

Figure 13

Figure 13. Spectral distribution of the turbulent kinetic energy at the wake half-width. The spectra are offset by two decades between each line: (a) $Ma=0.8$; (b) $Ma=2.0$.

Figure 14

Figure 14. Evolution of the integrated Favre-averaged anisotropy for $Ma_{r}=0.8$ (a) and 2.0 (b).

Figure 15

Table 2. Peak values of the Favre-averaged Reynolds stress anisotropy for the near-wake evolution. The mixing layer results are obtained from Pantano & Sarkar (2002).

Figure 16

Figure 15. Convection velocity at various temporal locations during transition of the wake: (a) $Ma_{r}=0.8$; (b) $Ma_{r}=2.0$. A fourth-order polynomial is used to interpolate all the discrete convective velocity profiles for clarity. The convection velocity is based on the separation distance which maximizes the two-point correlation of density, ${\it\rho}$, with ${\it\tau}=4$.

Figure 17

Figure 16. Evolution of the magnitude of the maximum pressure and density gradient (a) and the minimum and maximum pressure (b).

Figure 18

Figure 17. Magnitude of the density gradient (at the middle of the spanwise computational domain) for $Ma_{r}=0.8$ at times (top to bottom) 41, 46, 51, 56, 62 and 76.

Figure 19

Figure 18. Magnitude of the density gradient (at the middle of the spanwise computational domain) for $Ma_{r}=2.0$ at times (top to bottom) 66, 78, 93, 109 and 122.

Figure 20

Figure 19. Evolution of the spanwise educed structure for $Ma=0.8$ (at approximately $x=46$) at times 46 (a), 48 (b), 52 (c), 54 (d) and 56 (e).

Figure 21

Figure 20. Formation of a roller from an instantaneous slice of the spanwise vorticity for the low Mach number case ($Ma=0.8$). Contour lines are ${\it\omega}_{z}=\pm 0.25$, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0.

Figure 22

Figure 21. Evolution of the spanwise educed structure for $Ma=2.0$ (at around $x=42$) at times 76 (a), 84 (b), 88 (c), 90 (d) and 92 (e).

Figure 23

Figure 22. Formation of a roller from an instantaneous slice of the spanwise vorticity for the higher Mach number case ($Ma=2.0$). Contour lines are ${\it\omega}_{z}=\pm 0.05$, 0.15, 0.3, 0.45 0.6 and 0.75. The approximate rotation angle of the principal axis of the elliptical rollers is shown: (a) $35^{\circ }$; (b) $50^{\circ }$; (c) $95^{\circ }$; (d) $120^{\circ }$; (e) $145^{\circ }$.

Figure 24

Figure 23. Conceptual sketch of the growth of a sinusoidal perturbation in a shear layer. The wavelength, ${\it\lambda}$, increases and the growth $\text{Im}({\it\omega})$ decreases with $Ma$. In a shear flow, the perturbations in a low-speed wake (denoted $ls$, (a)) will have a more circular while the high-speed wake (denoted $hs$, (b)) will be more elliptical. The lines correspond to the temporal evolution of a sinusoidal perturbation.

Figure 25

Figure 24. Evolution of the size of the spanwise rollers during transition. The separation length of the first positive peak in the two-point correlation of the cross-wake velocity was used to estimate the size of the rollers (a). Evolution of the ratio of the cross-wake to streamwise separation of rollers with comparative line of the neutrally stable configuration (b).

Figure 26

Figure 25. Top view of the transition of $Ma=0.8$ during transition at $t=50$ (a), 54 (b), 56 (c), 58 (d), 60 (e), 62 (f), 64 (g), 66 (h) and 68 (i). Isosurfaces of ${\it\lambda}_{2}$ coloured by the streamwise velocity. Each panel corresponds to $3/16$ of the total streamwise domain ($L_{x}\approx 12.7$).

Figure 27

Figure 26. Top view of the transition of $Ma=2.0$ during transition at $t=90$ (a), 94 (b), 96 (c), 98 (d), 100 (e), 104 (f) and 108 (g). Isosurfaces of ${\it\lambda}_{2}$ coloured by the streamwise velocity. Each panel corresponds to ${\approx}3/18$ of the total streamwise domain ($Lx\approx 13.1$).

Figure 28

Figure 27. Illustrative effects of compressibility on the domain of influence of the rollers. In typical low-speed wakes ($ls$), communication occurs primarily between neighbouring vortices along the same row (a). In higher-speed wakes ($hs$), the domain of influence is predominantly in the cross-wake direction (b).

Figure 29

Figure 28. Organization of the rib vortices (isosurface of $Q=0.5$) with respect to the spanwise rollers at $Ma=2.0$ at $t=92$. The rollers are identified by a two-dimensional contour plot of the ${\it\lambda}_{2}$-criteria.

Figure 30

Figure 29. Experimental roller visualization for a planar wake at $Ma=3.0$ (reproduced with permission from Clemens & Smith 1998).

Figure 31

Figure 30. Evolution of the minimal ratio of ${\it\eta}/{\rm\Delta}x$ during transition (a); simulations at $Re=1500$ (dashed lines) and $Re=3000$ (full lines). Grid convergence test based on the evolution of the peak turbulent kinetic energy for the wake at $Ma=2.0$ (b) and the streamwise dissipation (c) using three different grid densities: 77, 413 and 619 million nodes.