Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:31:09.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using synergy of experimental and computational techniques to solve monomer–trimer dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2014

Dubravka Šišak Jung
Affiliation:
DECTRIS Ltd., Neuenhoferstrasse 107, 5400 Baden, Switzerland
Tomica Hrenar*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Ozren Jović
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Petra Kalinovičić
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Ines Primožič
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: hrenar@chem.pmf.hr

Abstract

An example of commercially available product, 2-(methylideneamino)acetonitrile (MAAN). This paper will address problems in discerning monomer–polymer ambiguity in organic compounds. Reliable three-step analysis of organic polymers will be proposed using the synergy of computational [density functional theory (DFT)] and experimental [infrared spectroscopy (IR); X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD)] techniques. First, possible conformations of monomeric and trimeric MAAN were calculated using stochastic search and DFT. Second, identification of the commercial sample was performed by comparing the measured IR spectrum with those calculated for monomer and trimer. Third, the examination of sample purity and structural analysis were carried out using XRPD data.

Information

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2014 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Two-dimensional molecular diagrams for (a) monomeric and (b) trimeric MAAN.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (Colour online) One-dimensional PES scan spanned by torsional coordinate φ1 and calculated using the B3LYP/6-31G(d) method.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (Colour online) Monomeric MAAN: (a) minimal energy conformers with symmetry Cs, and (b) enantiomeric pair of high-energy conformers with symmetry C1.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (Colour online) Lowest-energy conformer of trimeric MAAN (two orientations).

Figure 4

Figure 5. (Colour online) IR spectra for trimeric MAAN (a) measured and (b) calculated.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (Colour online) Last cycle of the Rietveld refinement: measured pattern (black), calculated (red), and difference curve (blue).

Figure 6

Table I. Details of the XRPD measurement of MAAN commercial sample.

Figure 7

Table II. Details of Rietveld refinement for the MAAN trimer crystal structure.

Figure 8

Figure 7. (Colour online) (a) Crystal structure viewed along the c-axis (b) comparison of molecular structure (blue) to the molecular structure obtained from DFT calculations (red).

Figure 9

Figure 8. Comparison of molecular structure (red) to the molecular structure obtained from single-crystal data (blue).

Figure 10

Table III. Comparison between the structures obtained from the XRPD and single-crystal data.