Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:26:24.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advanced materials for flexible electrochemical energy storage devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2018

Linheng He*
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Kechun Wen
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Zuoxiang Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Luhan Ye
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
Weiqiang Lv
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Jipeng Fei
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Shangqun Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Weidong He*
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: weidong.he@uestc.edu.cn

Abstract

Flexibility is a key parameter of device mechanical robustness. The most profound challenge for the realization of flexible electronics is associated with the relatively low flexibility of power sources. In this article, two kinds of energy applications, which have gained increasing attention in the field of flexibility in recent years, are introduced: the lithium-ion batteries and the supercapacitors. We overview the latest progresses in flexible materials and manufacturing technology. The performances of the energy devices based on flexible materials are introduced. The advantages and disadvantages of different manufacturing processes are discussed systematically. We then focus on current technical difficulties and future prospects of research in flexibility.

Information

Type
REVIEW
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Latest flexible energy devices with high application potential, including the flexible LIBs and supercapacitors.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. (a) Diagrammatic figure of the flexible battery with a cathode and an anode made from the interconnected graphene foam. (b–d) Characteristics of a flexible LTO/GF electrode: (b) photograph of a flexible LTO/GF being bent (2 × 2 cm2), (c and d) SEM images of the LTO/GF, (e) TEM image of the LTO/GF, (f) TEM image of the LTO nanosheets in LTO/GF, and (g) TEM image of a LTO nanosheet showing lattice fringes with a spacing of 0.48 nm. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 57. Copyright (2012), National Academy of Sciences.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Materials characterization of the as-prepared thin films: SEM (a) and HRTEM (b) images of the TiO2 nanofibers, SEM images of the multiwall CNTs (c), the freestanding CT-1 composites: (d) photograph of the bended CT-1 film [the inset of (d)], and CT-3 (e), and XRD patterns (f). Here, CT-1 and CT-3 represent pure CNTs to TiO2 nanofibers of 1:1 and 1:3. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 59. Copyright (2013), Elsevier.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. (a) Figure of a flexible single-layered LiFePO4 paper electrode. (b) SEM image of the LiFePO4 paper electrode. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 61. Copyright (2013), Elsevier.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of flexible 3D ZnCo2O4 nanowire arrays/carbon cloth. Morphology characterization. (b–e) Typical FESEM images of the ZnCo2O4 nanowire arrays growing on carbon cloth at different magnifications. Scale bars: (b) 200 μm; (c) 20 μm; (d) 5 μm; (e) 1 μm. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 64. Copyright (2012), American Chemical Society.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Cross-sectional SEM images of the porous membrane for samples of PVDF/PMMA (wt%/wt%) at (a) 100/0, (b) 70/30, (c) 50/50, (d) 30/70, (e) 10/90, and (f) 0/100. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 75. Copyright (2012), Elsevier.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. SEM photos at different mass ratios of dichloromethane to ethanol solvents of electrospun CMCAB nanofibers. The mass ratio of solvent dichloromethane to ethanol was (a) 9:1, (b) 4:1, (c) 7:3, and (d) 6:4, when other spinning conditions remain unchanged. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 82. Copyright (2013), Elsevier.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. (a) Schematic representation of large-scale fabrication of the fibrous cellulose membrane separator using the forcespinning® technique and subsequent alkaline hydrolysis treatment. (b and c) SEM images of FS cellulose acetate and (d and e) fibrous cellulose membrane. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 83. Copyright (2015), Springer.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. (a) Schematic of the fabrication procedure for functionalized freestanding CNT films. (b) Cross-sectional SEM image of the functionalized freestanding CNT film. (c) Enlarged cross-sectional SEM image of the functionalized freestanding CNT films. The inset is the digital image of a functionalized freestanding CNT film. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 91. Copyright (2014), Elsevier.

Figure 9

FIG. 10. (a) Photographic demonstration of electrodes and SC fabrication steps. (b) Fabrication steps of planar SC and the photograph of SCs with and without gold electrode. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 106. Copyright (2015), American Chemical Society.