Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T12:05:37.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-heating of silicon microwires: Crystallization and thermoelectric effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2011

Gokhan Bakan*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
Niaz Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
Adam Cywar
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
Kadir Cil
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
Mustafa Akbulut
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
Ali Gokirmak
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
Helena Silva*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: gokhan@engr.uconn.edu

Abstract

We describe experiments on self-heating and melting of nanocrystalline silicon microwires using single high-amplitude microsecond voltage pulses, which result in growth of large single-crystal domains upon resolidification. Extremely high current densities (>20 MA/cm2) and consequent high temperatures (1700 K) and temperature gradients (1 K/nm) along the microwires give rise to strong thermoelectric effects. The thermoelectric effects are characterized through capture and analysis of light emission from the self-heated wires biased with lower magnitude direct current/alternating current voltages. The hottest spot on the wires consistently appears closer to the lower potential end for n-type microwires and to the higher potential end for p-type microwires. The experimental light emission profiles are used to verify the mathematical models and material parameters used for the simulations. Good agreement between experimental and simulated profiles indicates that these models can be used to predict and design optimum geometry and bias conditions for current-induced crystallization of microstructures.

Information

Type
Invited Feature Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Device fabrication schematics: (a) silicon dioxide (SiO2) growth and nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si) deposition; (b) patterning of the nc-Si film; (c) forming of metal extensions.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of as-fabricated (a) suspended microwire and (b) microwire on oxide with metal extensions. The parts of the structure that are released from the underlying oxide appear as lighter color.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup. RMetal and RSi are resistances of metal extension and total Si resistance (contact pad and wire), respectively. C is the coaxial cable capacitance (100 pF). (b) Example of voltage pulse with 16 V amplitude and 1 μs duration.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. (a)–(h) SEM images of 5.5-μm long, p-type microwires after 20 V, 1 μs pulses. Wide microwires show breaking and crystallized segments or Si accumulation on Si pads under the same pulse condition. (i) I–t plots of the microwires show two transitions and a flat region before the wires break.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. (a) Room temperature resistance of microwires with different widths as a function of length from one test site. The y-intercept corresponds to the Si pad resistance, which is expected to be approximately the same for all microwires. (b) Reciprocal of α as a function of design width, obtained from the linear fits in (a). The x-intercept corresponds to the difference between design and actual widths. (c) Resistance of the liquid path for different widths as a function of length as extracted from the flat regions of the I–t plots. (d) Calculated liquid Si resistivity from three different test sites. Dashed lines indicate previous liquid Si resistivity reports: (i) Ref. 16 (ii) Ref. 17, and (iii) Ref. 18.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. (a) An as-fabricated, n-type, suspended microwire and two microwires after (b) 40 V, 1 μs and (c) 40 V, 2 μs pulse. Resistance of the wire in (b) decreased significantly after the pulse.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. SEM image of a (a) 25-μm long, suspended, p-type microwire, (b) 20-μm long, suspended, p-type microwire after a 25 V, 1 μs pulse with current direction during the pulse as indicated. (c) Closeup image of left end of the microwire. (d) I–t plot of the microwire during pulse, showing onset of melting as a sudden increase in current.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Bright field transmission electron microscope image of a section of a 20-μm long crystallized microwire and corresponding electron diffraction pattern (inset).

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Two sets of video frames showing glow of (a) an n-type and (b) a p-type microwire as current through the microwires increases as indicated. Electrical bias conditions are shown on the top frames. Microwires’ dimensions (L, W, t) are (4, 0.41, 0.08) μm and (4, 0.42, 0.12) μm for the n- and p-type microwires, respectively. Evolution of glow intensity for the (c) n- and (d) p-type microwires. Wire centers are located at x = 0. Dashed lines indicate ends of the microwires. Curves are smoothened with 5-point adjacent averaging filter.

Figure 9

FIG. 10. SEM image of a p-type microwire after a slow voltage sweep, with current direction as indicated. The higher potential end of the microwire, which coincides with the hottest region as observed optically, shows significant modification and fractures.

Figure 10

FIG. 11. A 2.5-μm-long, suspended, n-type microwire during the (a) positive and (b) negative cycle of an applied square wave with 0.95 mA amplitude. Current levels and directions are as indicated. Wire center is located at x = 0. (c) Current (I) through the microwire and shift (Δx) in the hottest spot location as a function of time.

Figure 11

FIG. 12. Experimental Seebeck coefficient of Si as a function of temperature from the literature. Crystallinity, dopant type, and doping level or resistivity of the samples are indicated in the legend. nb-Si is used for nanobulk Si. aRef. 34, bRef. 32, cRef. 33, dRef. 35, and eRef. 36.

Figure 12

FIG. 13. Three-dimensional structure used for numerical modeling: a 2.5-μm long, suspended nc-Si microwire and pads on SiO2 over c-Si substrate. A single voltage pulse or a square signal with increasing amplitude is applied to the square section of the left pad, while the square section on the right pad and the bottom surface of the substrate are set to 0 V. The temperature at these electrical boundaries is kept at 300 K.

Figure 13

TABLE I. Room temperature values of the physical parameters used for the modeling.

Figure 14

FIG. 14. (a) Simulated peak temperature on a 2.5-μm long, suspended, n-type, nc-Si wire during a 5.8 V, 1 μs voltage pulse with 5 ns rise and fall times. (b) Simulated time required to reach the melting temperature of Si (1690 K) on the wire as a function of voltage pulse amplitude. (c) Simulated temperature along the wire just before reaching melting temperature with and without thermoelectric effects. The arrow indicates the current direction.

Figure 15

FIG. 15. (a, b) Simulated temperature profiles of the suspended, n-type microwire for indicated current level and direction. Experimental and simulated light intensity for (c) positive and (d) negative voltage cycles. Current direction for each cycle is as indicated. The simulated light intensity profiles are calculated as blackbody radiation from the microwires in the visible range, at a current level (0.96 mA) that matches the experimental value.