Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:47:57.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The microstructure evolution and properties of a Cu–Cr–Ag alloy during thermal-mechanical treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

Yue Liu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Zhou Li*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Yexin Jiang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Yang Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Zheyuan Zhou
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Qian Lei*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2136, USA
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: lizhou6931@csu.edu.cn
b) e-mail: qianlei@umich.edu

Abstract

A Cu–0.13Cr–0.074Ag (wt%) alloy has been synthesized by the nonvacuum melting and casting followed by thermal-mechanical treatment, and microstructure and mechanical properties have been tailored to make a trade-off between the strength and the electrical conductivity. Results illuminated that the designed alloy has a tensile strength of 473 MPa, a hardness of 140 HV, a yield strength of 446 MPa, an elongation of 10.5%, and an electrical conductivity of 94.5% IACS. Microstructure observations of the samples aged at 480 °C showed that: an fcc structure Cr-phase with a cube-on-cube orientation relationship with the Cu matrix was formed as aged for 15 min, while an ordered bcc structure Cr phase with B2 structure formed as aged for 2 h. The 3DAP results revealed that the Cr was formed to be precipitates and the Ag was formed as solutes distributing evenly in matrix. The high electrical conductivity was ascribed to the Cr element precipitated from the Cu matrix, Ag dissolved in the Cu matrix had little effect on the scattering of Cu electron.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Variation of micro-hardness and conductivity of the sample treated with the different aging process. (a) Microhardness; (b) conductivity.

Figure 1

TABLE I. Mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of the designed alloy with the second cold rolling.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. TEM images and SADPs of the Cu–0.13Cr–0.074Ag alloy as solution treated, cold rolling by 60% and then aged at 480 °C for different time. (a) BF micrograph after cold rolling; (b) and (c) BF micrographs of the alloy cold-rolled by 60% then aged at 480 °C for 15 min; (d) SADP of (b), beam direction along [112]Cu; (e) SADP of (b), beam direction along [001]Cu; (f) SADP of (c).

Figure 3

FIG. 3. TEM BF and SADPs of Cu–0.13Cr–0.074Ag alloy as solution treated, cold rolled by 60% and then aged at 480 °C for 1 h. (a) bright field image; (c) SADPs of (a), beam direction along [100]Cu; (e) index of the diffraction pattern showed in (c); (b) dark field image; (d) SADPs of (a), beam direction along [112]Cu; (f) index of the index of diffraction pattern showed in (d). Spots indexed in (e) and (f) show positions of the Cu matrix (○) and Cr-rich phase (○) and the super lattice diffraction spots (●).

Figure 4

FIG. 4. TEM HRTEM images of Cu–0.13Cr–0.074Ag alloy as solution treated, cold rolled by 60% and then aged at 480 °C for 2 h. (a) TEM; (b) HRTEM.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. TEM BF image of the Cu–Cr–Ag alloy treated as solution treated, cold rolled by 60% and aged at 480 °C for 2 h then cold rolled by 70%.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. The STEM image of alloy as solution treated, cold rolled by 60% and then aged at 480 °C for 30 min. (a) and (b) the HADDF image of alloy; (c), (d) and (e) the EDS analysis of Cu, Cr, and Ag elements respectively.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. 2D projection of 3D distributions of atom map of the Cu–Cr–Ag alloy with the treatment of solution, cold rolling by 60% and aging at 480 °C for 2 h. Probed volume is 32 × 32 × 94 nm. Scale bar is 10 nm.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. Fracture surface of the alloy treated with different process. (a) Aged at 480 °C for 2 h. (b) Aged at 480 °C for 2 h and cold rolling by 50%. (c) Aged at 480 °C for 2 h and cold rolling by 70%.

Figure 9

TABLE II. Solid solution strengthening of the Cu–Cr–Ag alloy.

Figure 10

TABLE III. Precipitation hardening of the Cu–Cr–Ag alloy.

Figure 11

TABLE IV. The values of the calculation of the grain refinement strengthening.

Figure 12

TABLE V. The values of the calculation of the strain hardening.

Figure 13

TABLE VI. The electro negativity, atom radius of Cu, Cr and Ag elements.

Figure 14

FIG. 9. Comparisons of tensile strength and electrical conductivities of other elastic coppers and the designed alloy. (a) Tensile strength; (b) electrical conductivity.