Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:50:08.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Follow-up in patients with congenital cardiac disease more complex than haemodynamic assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2005

Per Morten Fredriksen
Affiliation:
Physiotherapy Department, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Anne Marit Mengshoel
Affiliation:
Section of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Aina Frydenlund
Affiliation:
Section of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric Division, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Øystein Sørbye
Affiliation:
Sogn Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Section of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric Division, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Erik Thaulow
Affiliation:
Paediatric Heart Section, Children's Clinic, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess behavioural and emotional problems, as well as physical capacity, in children and adolescents with congenital cardiac disease. From the database of Paediatric Heart Section, Children's Clinic, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, we identified 430 patients whose parents received questionnaires using the Child Behaviour Check-List. The response rate was 75.8%. In addition, the parents received a questionnaire focusing on special issues with regard to physical activity. Parents of children and adolescents with congenital cardiac diseases reported significantly more behavioural problems than did a reference population and boys were scored higher compared to girls. Analysis showed a significant impact of physical capacity on the score representing total problems, as well as scores for externalising and internalising behaviour. Compared to a reference population, parents of children and adolescents with congenital cardiac disease score their children higher on most scales when rated using the Child Behaviour Check-List. The type of diagnosis did not affect the scores reflecting the total problem. The main factor of impact on behavioural problems was, as evaluated by the parents, the physical capacity of the children.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1.

Figure 1

Table 2.

Figure 2

Table 3.

Figure 3

Table 4.

Figure 4

Table 5.

Figure 5

Table 6.

Figure 6

Table 7.

Figure 7

Results from the report of the parents of how far they estimate their child can run compared to the total problem score (0 = outliers are values 1.5 times higher than the box which contains 50% of all the results, X = extremes which are values that are 3 times higher than the box).