Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:26:19.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Worldwide variability of insecticide resistance mechanisms in the codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2008

M. Reyes*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Producción y Protección Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla567, Valdivia, Chile
P. Franck
Affiliation:
Ecologie de la Production Intégrée, Plantes et systèmes de culture horticoles, INRA. Site Agroparc, 84914Avignon Cedex 9, France
J. Olivares
Affiliation:
Ecologie de la Production Intégrée, Plantes et systèmes de culture horticoles, INRA. Site Agroparc, 84914Avignon Cedex 9, France
J. Margaritopoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry-Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Ploutonos 26, 41221Larissa, Greece
A. Knight
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, WA 98951, USA
B. Sauphanor
Affiliation:
Ecologie de la Production Intégrée, Plantes et systèmes de culture horticoles, INRA. Site Agroparc, 84914Avignon Cedex 9, France
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +56 63 22 12 33 E-mail: mrreyes@uach.cl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The activity of detoxifying enzymes (glutathione-S-transferases (GST), mixed-function oxidases (MFO), and esterases (EST)) and the presence of insensitive variants of target proteins (sodium channel and acetylcholinesterase) were examined in individual male and female codling moths. Twenty-nine populations from 11 countries and two laboratory strains were examined. Populations were classified as either unsprayed or sprayed. The ranges of enzyme activities across field populations varied 15-fold, 485-fold and fourfold for GST, MFO and EST, respectively. MFO was the only enzyme whose activity differed in a binomial classification of orchards based on their spray history. Few differences in enzyme activities were found due to sex among populations; and, in these cases, males had higher GST and lower MFO and EST activities than females. Activities of the three enzymatic systems across all populations were positively correlated. Populations from Greece, Argentina and Uruguay had significant percentages of moths with elevated GST and MFO activities. The co-occurrence of moths expressing both elevated MFO and low EST activities was found in conventional orchards from the Czech Republic and France. Chile was the only country where populations from treated orchards did not include a significant proportion of individuals with enhanced enzyme activity. The kdr mutation was found at significant levels in ten populations from five countries, including all French and Argentinean populations. The mutation in AChE was only detected in the Spanish population.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of field populations and laboratory strains of Cydia pomonella included in the analyses of enzyme activity and genetic mutations associated with insecticide resistances.

Figure 1

Table 2. Mean enzyme activities expressed in two laboratory strains of Cydia pomonella.

Figure 2

Table 3. Mean activities of glutathione S-transferase activities (fluorescence units/mg protein) and their resistance ratios (R/S) compared with the insecticide-susceptible laboratory strain (Sv) for 29 field populations of male and female Cydia pomonella.

Figure 3

Table 4. Mean activities of mixed function oxidase (pg of 7OH formed/mg protein/min) and their resistance ratios (R/S) compared with the susceptible laboratory strain (Sv) for 29 field populations of male and female codling moth.

Figure 4

Table 5. Mean activities of esterases (nm of Β napthol/mg protein/min) and their resistance ratios (R/S) compared with a susceptible laboratory strain (Sv) for 29 field populations of male and female codling moth.

Figure 5

Table 6. Frequency of codling moth adults within two laboratory strains and 29 field-collected populations characterized as resistant based on enzyme activities.

Figure 6

Table 7. Genotype frequency (%) of codling moth adults within two laboratory strains and 29 field-collected populations for kdr and F290-AChE loci.