Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T10:04:11.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dog hepatocytes are key effector cells in the liver innate immune response to Leishmania infantum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

A. Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal
G. Alexandre-Pires
Affiliation:
CIISA, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal
A. Valério-Bolas
Affiliation:
Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal
D. Santos-Mateus
Affiliation:
Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal
M. Rafael-Fernandes
Affiliation:
Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal
M. A. Pereira
Affiliation:
Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal
D. Ligeiro
Affiliation:
IPST-Centro de Sangue e Transplantação de Lisboa, Alameda das Linhas de Torres 117, 1749-005 Lisbon, Portugal
T. Nunes
Affiliation:
Microscopy Center, Faculty of Sciences, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
R. Alves-Azevedo
Affiliation:
Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal
S. Lopes-Ventura
Affiliation:
Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal
M. Santos
Affiliation:
CIISA, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal
A. M. Tomás
Affiliation:
I3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, IBMC, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular and, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, ICBAS Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
I. Pereira da Fonseca
Affiliation:
CIISA, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal
G. Santos-Gomes*
Affiliation:
Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author for correspondence: Gabriela M. Santos-Gomes, E-mail: santosgomes@ihmt.unl.pt

Abstract

Hepatocytes constitute the majority of hepatic cells, and play a key role in controlling systemic innate immunity, via pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) and by synthesizing complement and acute phase proteins. Leishmania infantum, a protozoan parasite that causes human and canine leishmaniasis, infects liver by establishing inside the Kupffer cells. The current study proposes the elucidation of the immune response generated by dog hepatocytes when exposed to L. infantum. Additionally, the impact of adding leishmanicidal compound, meglumine antimoniate (MgA), to parasite-exposed hepatocytes was also addressed. L. infantum presents a high tropism to hepatocytes, establishing strong membrane interactions. The possibility of L. infantum internalization by hepatocytes was raised, but not confirmed. Hepatocytes were able to recognize parasite presence, inducing PRRs [nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)1, NOD2 and Toll-like receptor (TLR)2] gene expression and generating a mix pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine response. Reduction of cytochrome P 450s enzyme activity was also observed concomitant with the inflammatory response. Addition of MgA increased NOD2, TLR4 and interleukin 10 gene expression, indicating an immunomodulatory role for MgA. Hepatocytes seem to have a major role in coordinating liver's innate immune response against L. infantum infection, activating inflammatory mechanisms, but always balancing the inflammatory response in order to avoid cell damage.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Hepatocyte morphology. Cell samples with 24 (A) and 48 h (B) of culture were observed under an optical inverted microscope (A, scale bar: 20 µm, ×400 magnification) and a SEM (B) and images were acquired. Individualized cells with round shape, nucleus and abundance of intracellular organelles (A) with a tendency to aggregate (A, B and C) were identified. Hepatocytes with a smooth cell membrane were observed 48 h after isolation (B). Artificial colour (B) was applied to cells (red) to evidence cell morphology. Hepatocytes incubated for 72 h (C) were stained for actin (green), a component of cell cytoskeleton, and for ferritin (red), usually prevailing in secretory vesicles. Cells were observed under a fluorescence confocal microscope and images were acquired. The characteristic rounded shape of individualized hepatocytes, nuclei (black round spots) and cell aggregates are also observed.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Hepatocytes exposed to L. infantum. (A) Culture samples obtained at 1.5, 5 and 24 h of promastigotes exposure were collected and observed under an inverted microscope (OM, scale bar: 20 µm, ×400 magnification) and a SEM and images were acquired. At early parasite exposure (1.5 h), promastigotes are in the proximity of hepatocytes but, with incubation time, promastigotes surround the hepatocyte (5 h) and parasite interaction with the cell membrane of hepatocyte becomes evident (24 h). The interaction of the parasite with the cell membrane (white arrows) can be observed. SEM images artificial coloured evidenced the close interaction of the promastigote form (yellow) and the hepatocyte membrane (red). Culture samples obtained at 24 h of amastigotes exposure were collected and observed under an inverted microscope (OM, scale bar: 20 µm, ×400 magnification) and SEM and images were acquired (B). The interaction of the parasite with the cell membrane (white arrows) can be seen and parasites exhibiting amastigote morphological characteristics can be observed. SEM images artificial coloured evidenced the close interaction of the amastigote form (yellow) and the hepatocyte membrane (red).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Actin and ferritin in cultured hepatocyte exposed to L. infantum virulent promastigotes. Hepatocytes incubated for 24 h in the presence of L. infantum promastigotes (with arrows) were stained for actin (green), a component of cell cytoskeleton, and for ferritin (red), frequently present in secretory vesicles. Cells were observed under a fluorescence confocal microscope and images were acquired. Hepatocytes present a large round nucleus (stained red by TO-PRO®). Promastigotes exhibit a high tropism to hepatocytes and seem to induce hepatocyte to generate more vesicles (5 h).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Production of urea and NO by hepatocytes exposed to L. infantum. Hepatocytes were used to evaluate de novo production of urea (A) and NO (B) after 72 h of exposure to amastigotes or promastigotes. In parallel, non-exposed hepatocytes and LPS-stimulated hepatocytes were also evaluated as negative and positive controls, respectively. Results of samples of 12 livers performed in triplicate are represented by mean and standard error (A) or by box plots and whiskers (median, minimum to maximum) (B). The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparisons. *Represents values of statistical significance (P < 0.05) when comparing non-exposed hepatocytes vs the other conditions.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (A) NOD1 and (B) NOD2 gene expression in hepatocytes exposed to L. infantum. Hepatocytes were used to evaluate NOD1 and NOD2 mRNA accumulation for 24 h of exposure to amastigotes or promastigotes. Hepatocytes not exposed to parasites and LPS-stimulated hepatocytes were also evaluated. Results of samples of 12 liver performed in triplicate are represented by Tukey graphs. Black dots are indicative of outlier values. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparisons (P < 0.05). *Represents values of statistical significance when comparing not-exposed hepatocytes vs the other conditions.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Gene expression of IL-10, IL-6 and TNF-α by hepatocytes exposed to L. infantum. Hepatocytes were used to evaluate IL-10 (A), IL-6 (B) and TNF-α (C) mRNA accumulation for 24 h of exposure to amastigotes or promastigotes. Non-exposed hepatocytes and LPS-stimulated hepatocytes were also evaluated. Results of samples of 12 livers performed in triplicate are represented by Tukey graphs. Black dots are indicative of outlier values. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparisons (P < 0.05). *Represents values of statistical significance when comparing not-exposed hepatocyte vs the other conditions.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Viability of dog hepatocytes and L. infantum axenic amastigotes exposed to MgA. The viability of 72 h-cultured hepatocytes incubated with MgA (A) was evaluated for more 72 h by a resazurin assay. Non-treated hepatocytes (living cells) and hepatocytes fixed with paraformaldehyde (dead cells) were evaluated in parallel. Samples of amastigote-exposed hepatocytes treated with MgA (B) for 1.5 and 5 h of incubation were plated in SCH medium and incubated at 24 °C. In parallel, plated axenic amastigotes were also allowed to differentiate in promastigotes under the same conditions. The reciprocal of the last promastigote positive dilution was considered as indicative of viability. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparisons. *Indicates significant differences (P < 0.05). Inscribed values indicate the reduction obtained when compared to the amastigote reciprocal dilution (100% viability).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Phase I and phase II enzyme activity after MgA treatment of hepatocytes exposed to L. infantum axenic amastigotes. Hepatocytes treated for 72 h were used to evaluate EROD (A), BROD (B), MROD (C), PROD (D) and UGT (E) enzyme activity. In parallel, the enzymatic activity of non-treated hepatocytes (LiAexp) was also evaluated. Results of samples of 12 livers performed in triplicate are represented by box plots and whiskers (median, minimum to maximum). The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparisons. *Represents statistical significance values (P < 0.05) when comparing non-treated amastigote-exposed hepatocytes vs treated amastigote-exposed hepatocytes.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Gene expression of PRRs by amastigote-exposed hepatocytes after MgA treatment. Hepatocytes treated with MgA were used to evaluate NOD1, NOD2 (A), TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 (B) mRNA accumulation for 24 h. In parallel, PRR gene expression was also evaluated in non-treated amastigote-exposed hepatocytes (LiAexp). Results of samples of 12 livers performed in triplicate are represented by Tukey graphs. Black dots are indicative of outlier values. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparisons. *Indicates statistically important differences (P < 0.05) when comparing treated and non-treated hepatocytes.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Gene expression of IL-10, IL-6 and TNF-α by hepatocytes exposed to L. infantum axenic amastigotes after MgA treatment. Hepatocytes treated with MgA for 24 h and non-treated amastigote-exposed hepatocytes (LiAexp) were used to evaluate IL-10, (A), IL-6 (B) and TNF-α (C) mRNA accumulation. Results of samples of 12 livers performed in triplicate are represented by Tukey graphs. Black dots are indicative of outlier values. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparisons. *Represents statistical significance values (P < 0.05) when comparing non-treated vs treated hepatocytes.

Supplementary material: File

Rodrigues et al. supplementary material

Rodrigues et al. supplementary material 1

Download Rodrigues et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.8 MB