Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:48:50.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Late Holocene hydroclimatic change at Cienega Amarilla, west-central New Mexico, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2017

Jill Onken*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th St., Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Susan J. Smith
Affiliation:
Consulting Archaeopalynologist, 8875 Carefree Ave., Flagstaff, Arizona 86004, USA
Manuel R. Palacios-Fest
Affiliation:
Terra Nostra Earth Sciences Research, P.O. Box 37195, Tucson, Arizona 85740, USA
Karen R. Adams
Affiliation:
Archaeobotanical Consultant, 2837 E. Beverly Dr., Tucson, Arizona 85716, USA
*
*Corresponding author at: Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th St., Tucson, AZ 85721, United States. E-mail address: jonken@email.arizona.edu (J. Onken).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A late Holocene carbonate spring mound and associated wetland deposits at Cienega Amarilla, New Mexico, contain a 4000-yr record of geomorphic, paleoenvironmental, and hydroclimatic change on the southern Colorado Plateau. Forty-four 14C dates support a century-scale chronostratigraphic framework. Pollen, plant macrofossil, mollusk, ostracode, and soil analyses indicate rapid spring mound growth and wetland expansion beginning ~2300 cal yr BP, followed by a pronounced decline in groundwater discharge (GWD) between ~1500 and 1000 cal yr BP. The isotopic composition of Cienega Amarilla springwater suggests GWD is driven primarily by winter precipitation. Historical climate data indicate that El Niño and warm Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) conditions foster wetter-than-average winters in the Cienega Amarilla area, whereas dry winters are associated with La Niña conditions regardless of PDO phase. The ~2300–1500 cal yr BP Cienega Amarilla pluvial appears to represent an interval of peak, late Holocene cool-season precipitation that implies unusually strong or persistent El Niño–like and warm PDO–like conditions in the Pacific. Other southwestern paleoenvironmental records corroborate atypically wet conditions during this interval, and pluvial conditions related to increased winter precipitation likely fostered significant prehistoric cultural changes throughout the region, including increased sedentism, population, and dependence on agriculture.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1 (color online) Location map of study area. Cienega Amarilla and Cottonwood Canyon subareas illustrated in Figure 2 are outlined in white. Inset map shows location of project area within the conterminous United States as small black rectangle, with Arizona and New Mexico shaded gray.

Figure 1

Figure 2 (color online) Satellite imagery showing Cienega Amarilla (a) and Cottonwood Canyon (b) profile locations. Dashed line outlines estimated original extent of spring mound.

Figure 2

Figure 3 (color online) Cienega Amarilla stratigraphic sections. C-1 is an undifferentiated Cibola White Ware sherd (AD 650–1325), and C-2 is an early Cibola White Ware sherd with sand temper (AD 800–1000). Radiocarbon dates are 2-sigma ranges in cal yr BP expressed as the median age±2σ, rounded to the nearest decade. Age in italics was rejected as anomalously old for context, and sample is probably redeposited. See web version of article for color version of this figure that differentiates groundwater carbonate facies.

Figure 3

Figure 4 (color online) Cottonwood Canyon stratigraphic sections. Radiocarbon dates are 2-sigma ranges in cal yr BP expressed as the median age±2σ, rounded to the nearest decade. Age in italics was rejected as anomalously old for context, and sample is probably old wood.

Figure 4

Figure 5 (color online) Geochronology of Cienega Amarilla and Cottonwood Canyon areas. Radiocarbon dates are calibrated ages plotted with 1-sigma standard deviation bars. Two rejected dates (see Table 1) are excluded. See web version of article for color version of this figure that depicts stratigraphic context of individual dates and shows dates associated with groundwater carbonate facies outlined in white.

Figure 5

Figure 6 (color online) Cienega Amarilla soil geochemistry at profiles 11-4, 11-2, and 11-37.

Figure 6

Figure 7 (color online) Cienega Amarilla pollen analysis results showing pollen concentrations in grains per gram. Oval symbols indicate presence. Supplementary Table 4 contains raw data and additional details.

Figure 7

Table 1 Accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon dates and δ13C values from Cienega Amarilla and Cottonwood Canyon.

Figure 8

Table 2 Fossil mollusks and ostracodes at Cienega Amarilla and Cottonwood Canyon.

Figure 9

Figure 8 (color online) Arroyo exposure at Cienega Amarilla profile 11-37 showing unit IIIb subdivisions.

Figure 10

Figure 9 (color online) Groundwater carbonate and black mat deposits at profile 11-39 at Cienega Amarilla spring mound showing upper ~3 m of exposure (left) and a close-up of spongy tufa with vertically oriented voids that formed around reedy emergent aquatic vegetation immediately above the 1940±60 cal yr BP date (right). Radiocarbon ages are 2-sigma ranges in cal yr BP expressed as the median age±2σ, rounded to the nearest decade.

Figure 11

Figure 10 (color online) Isotopic composition of Cienega Amarilla springwater plotted relative to winter (October–April) and summer (May–September) precipitation isotope data from GNIP (Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation) stations at Flagstaff and Tucson. Mean values are plotted with 1-sigma standard deviation bars. VSMOW, Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water; SLAP, Standard Light Antarctic Precipitation.

Figure 12

Table 3 Isotopic composition of Cienega Amarilla springwater (sample W63110) compared to winter (October–April) and summer (May–September) precipitation isotope data from GNIP (Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation) stations at Flagstaff and Tucson, Arizona.

Figure 13

Figure 11 (color online) Cienega Amarilla chronology and reconstructed depositional facies with winter (El Niño) precipitation record from El Junco Lake (Conroy et al., 2008) and summer (North American monsoon) precipitation record from the Gulf of Mexico (Poore et al., 2005). The ~2300–1500 cal yr BP interval of maximum late Holocene groundwater discharge at Cienega Amarilla is shaded. ENSO, El Niño–Southern Oscillation; MCA, Medieval Climate Anomaly; NAM, North American monsoon.

Figure 14

Figure 12 (color online) Seasonal precipitation anomalies of (a) ENSO phases and (b) ENSO and PDO phase combinations based on Springerville, Arizona, historical climate data from 1950 to 2004. Monthly data were pooled by season, and two PDO phases are represented (low from 1950 to 1977 and high from 1978 to 2004) per Kurtzman and Scanlon (2007). ENSO and PDO phase of each year as identified by Guan et al. (2005). Standard deviation (1σ) bars show temporal variability. ENSO, El Niño–Southern Oscillation; PDO, Pacific Decadal Oscillation.

Supplementary material: Image

Onken supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Onken supplementary material(Image)
Image 6.8 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Onken supplementary material

Table S1

Download Onken supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 67.2 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Onken supplementary material

Table S2

Download Onken supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 96.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Onken supplementary material

Table S3

Download Onken supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 48.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Onken supplementary material

Table S4

Download Onken supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 180.1 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Onken supplementary material

Table S5

Download Onken supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 102.4 KB