Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T10:47:09.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In situ TEM study on the microstructural evolution during electric fatigue in 0.7Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.3PbTiO3 ceramic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2014

Hanzheng Guo*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
Xiaoli Tan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
Shujun Zhang
Affiliation:
Materials Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: ghanzheng@gmail.com

Abstract

In this work, we report an experimental technique with nanometer resolution to reveal the microstructural mechanism for electric fatigue in ferroelectrics. The electric field in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to directly visualize the domain evolution during the fatigue process in a 0.7Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.3PbTiO3 ceramic. The structure–property relationship was well demonstrated by combining the microscopic observations with corresponding dielectric, piezoelectric, and ferroelectric properties measured on bulk specimens. It was found that the domain switching capability was substantially suppressed after 103 cycles of bipolar fields, leading to an immobilized domain configuration thereafter. Correspondingly, a pronounced degradation of the functionality of the ceramic was manifested, accompanying with a coercive field bumping and polarization current density peak broadening. The reduction of the polarization, dielectric constant, and piezoelectric coefficient were found to follow a power-law relation. Seed inhibition mechanism was suggested to be responsible for the observed fatigue behaviors.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Bright-field micrograph of a representative grain along its [113] zone axis in the virgin state of 0.7PMN-0.3PT ceramic. (b) Higher magnification image of the boxed area in (a) to show the hierarchical domain structure. (c) The corresponding selected area diffraction pattern.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. In situ TEM observations of a grain along its [001] zone axis in a 0.7PMN-0.3PT specimen during initial poling and bipolar electric reversals. Bright-field micrographs at (a) virgin state, (b) 6 kV/cm, and (c) 10 kV/cm during initial poling; (d) after 20 cycles and (e) after 103 cycles of bipolar cycling with a nominal amplitude of 10 kV/cm. The produced defects after 103 cycles are marked roughly along the direction of the bright arrow shown in (e). The selected area diffraction pattern recorded at the virgin state is shown in (f). The positive direction of applied fields in the TEM experiment is indicated by the bright arrow in (b). No apparent changes in the electron diffraction pattern are noticed during initial poling and fatigue process.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. In situ TEM observations of another grain along its [112] zone axis in the same 0.7PMN-0.3PT specimen during initial poling and electric reversals. Bright-field micrographs at (a) virgin state, (b) 5 kV/cm, and (c) 10 kV/cm during initial poling; (d) after 20 cycles, (e) after 103 cycles, (f) after 104 cycles, and (g) after 105 cycles during fatigue. After fatigue, the grain shown in (g) was further stressed at −31 kV/cm, as displayed in (h). The selected area diffraction pattern recorded at the virgin state is shown in (i). The positive direction of applied fields in the TEM experiment is indicated by the bright arrow in (b). No apparent changes in the electron diffraction pattern are noticed during initial poling and fatigue process.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. (a) Change of the polarization hysteresis loop and (b) polarization current density curves during electric fatigue in 0.7PMN-0.3PT bulk ceramic.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. (a) Polarization and coercive field, (b) dielectric constant, and (c) piezoelectric coefficient as a function of cycling number measured from the same bulk specimen as in Fig. 4. The experimentally measured results are shown as discrete points, while the solid fitting curves are derived using the power-law relation. The fitting equations are shown in the text.