Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T00:34:14.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bending light to our will

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2011

Harry Atwater*
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, haa@caltech.edu

Abstract

This article is based on the Fred Kavli Distinguished Lectureship in Nanoscience presentation given by Harry Atwater (California Institute of Technology) on April 5, 2010 at the Materials Research Society Spring Meeting in San Francisco, CA. The Kavli Foundation supports scientific research, honors scientific achievement, and promotes public understanding of scientists and their work. Its particular focuses are astrophysics, nanoscience, and neuroscience.

Solar energy is currently enjoying substantial growth and investment, owing to worldwide sensitivity to energy security and climate change. Solar energy is an inexhaustible resource and is in abundant supply on all continents of the world. The power density of sunlight (~1000 W/m2) and the efficiency of photovoltaic devices (~10–25%) are high enough so that land use does not limit photovoltaic deployment at the terawatt scale. However solar photovoltaics are currently too expensive to achieve parity with other forms of electricity generation based on fossil fuels. This is largely due to the cost (and for some cases, the abundance) of materials used in photovoltaic modules and systems, and the cost of deploying in current form. This economic and social context has created the present situation where there is widespread interest in photovoltaic technology for power generation, but the cumulative installed world capacity for photovoltaics is <50 GW, and it appears to be very challenging for photovoltaics to play a very substantial role in large-scale (terawatt) electricity generation in the short term.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

Figure 1. The solar spectrum is blackbody-like, solar photons are unpolarized, and sunlight has a variable angle of incidence (ω) for both global and direct illumination conditions. Therefore photonic materials for solar energy conversion must be able to accept a wide range of incidence angles and must be useful over a broad range of wavelengths.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Plasmonic light trapping amorphous Si (a-Si) solar cell design. (a) Schematic cross section of the patterned solar cell. Patterns are made on the rear glass substrate, and there is conformal deposition of all layers over the patterns through the top indium tin oxide contact. Incident blue and red arrows indicate that blue light is absorbed before reaching the back contact, while red light interacts more with the back patterns. (b) Photograph of finished imprinted patterned solar cell substrate. Each colored square is a separate device, with different particle diameter and pitch. (c) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of Ag overcoated patterns showing 290 nm diameter particles with 500 nm pitch. (d) SEM image of a cross section of a fabricated cell, cut using focused ion-beam milling. Note that the ultrathin a-Si:H layer constitutes only a small part of the cell.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Absorption enhancement η in a silicon layer on silver compared to a single pass at normal incidence for transverse magnetic (TM) modes (left panel) and transverse electric (TE) modes (right panel) as a function of the fraction of energy absorbed in the silicon layer. The marker size shows the thickness of the silicon layer from 100 to 1000 nm, and color indicates the wavelength. The surface plasmon polariton (SPP) mode shows significantly smaller enhancement than other modes, decreasing with increasing layer thickness. For the photonic modes, the absorption enhancement tends to rise with layer thickness. Note that the calculation here assumes that light does not scatter out of the mode.11

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a,b) Measured absorption and schematic of a Si wire array with 4.2% area fraction on a quartz slide (a) and on a Ag back-reflector (b). (c,d) Measured absorption and schematic of the same array as in (a,b) with an antireflective coating and embedded light-scatterers, measured on a quartz slide (c) and on a Ag back-reflector (d). PDMS, polydimethlysiloxane.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Single-layer negative index metamaterial slab consisting of a hexagonal array of subwavelength coaxial waveguide structures. The inner radius r1, outer radius r2, and array pitch p are defined in the image. (b) Unit cell of the periodic structure. The angle-of-incidence (θ) is shown, as well as the in-plane (p-) and out-of-plane (s-) polarization directions associated with the incident wavevector k.

Figure 5

Figure 6. The coaxial waveguide consists of a 25 nm GaP annular channel with a 75 nm inner diameter embedded in Ag. Plotted are the two lowest order linearly polarized modes that most strongly couple to free space radiation. (a–c) Energy is plotted versus (a) β', (b) β", (c) mode index nmode, and (d) the figure-of-merit FOM = β'/β". The Ag/GaP planar surface plasmon energy at 2.3 eV (540 nm) is indicated by the black dashed horizontal line. All panels show one mode with positive index (red curve) and one mode with a negative index (blue curve) below an energy of 2.7 eV (460 nm). The insets in (a) show the Re(Hy) (out-of-page) field distribution in the waveguide at a wavelength of 650 nm for the positive-index mode and at 483 nm for the negative-index mode.22h, reduced Planck’s constant; β', real part of the propagation constant; β", imaginary part of the propagation constant.