Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:14:48.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foetal cardiac function: assessing new technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2014

Helena M. Gardiner*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, The Texas Fetal Centre, Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: Professor H. M. Gardiner, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences, The Texas Fetal Centre, Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital, University of Texas, 6410 Fannin, Suite 700, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America. Tel: +1 832 325 7288; Fax: +1 7133831464; E-mail: Helena.m.gardiner@uth.tmc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assessment of foetal cardiac function is more challenging than in the adult, in whom emerging technologies are tested. The postnatal cardio-respiratory interaction is replaced by the cardio-placental circulation and impedance of the brain, and distal vascular beds play an important role in modulating flow to enable its redistribution in the foetal body. Prenatal specialists, comprising obstetricians and cardiologists, have tested a variety of traditional methodologies, as well as non-Doppler offline ultrasound methods in the foetus. This article reviews the development of techniques, outlines their use, and draws attention to pitfalls in adapting technologies validated in the adult heart to the small, fast beating, remote, and largely ungated foetal heart.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Diagram of the circulation in the normal foetus showing streams of flow of higher oxygen saturation in black and lower saturation flows in grey. In particular, note the low saturation of pulmonary venous return in the foetal heart. The approximate oxygen saturations are shown in the cardiac chambers and vessels. Ao=ascending aorta and its arch; AoD=descending aorta; DA=arterial duct; DV=venous duct; FO=oval foramen (or foramen ovale); IVC=inferior caval vein; LA=left atrium; LPA=left pulmonary artery; LPV=left pulmonary veins; LV=left ventricle; PA=pulmonary artery; RA=right atrium; RPA=right pulmonary artery; RPV=right pulmonary veins; SVC=superior caval vein.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Preload indices from Doppler recordings in systemic veins in the foetus. (Reproduced by permission from Rizzo et al20; figure 1).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Cartoon illustrating the semiquantitative blood flow classes (BFC) applicable to foetal arteries based on study by Gudmundsson and Marsál13: BFC 0 reflects a normal pulsatility index (PI); BFC 1 shows positive end-diastolic flow with PI>mean+2SD; BFC 2 is when end-diastolic flow is absent; BFC 3 is when there is absence or reversal of end-diastolic flow.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Maximal displacement of the atrioventricular annulus recorded by vector velocity imaging and M-mode. Maximal displacement recorded by vector velocity imaging (left) is the distance between end-systole and end-diastole (black arrow) calculated from X–Y coordinates. Maximal displacement of the annulus recorded by M-mode (white arrow) is shown on the right-sided panel. (Reproduced by permission from Matsui et al50; figure 5).

Figure 4

Figure 5 Doppler envelope of the modified myocardial performance index (Mod-MPI). The sample volume is located over the lateral wall of the aorta, close to the mitral valve. References for the time-period estimations are based on the echoes from the mitral and aortic valve movements. The E/A waveform is always displayed as positive flow. ET=ejection time; ICT=isovolumetric contraction time; IRT=isovolumetric relaxation time. (Reproduced by permission from Hernandez-Andrade et al39; figure 2).

Figure 5

Figure 6 The black line shows the tracking line in end-diastole, and the dashed line shows the tracking line at time t. In vector velocity imaging analysis, the software provides tracking points (white circle 0−n) in each frame of the two dimensional echo image. The length of the free wall is calculated from the summation of the small segments between consecutive tracking points (L1(t)–Ln(t)). Lagrangian myocardial strain is calculated from the ratio of change of the free wall length. (Reproduced by permission from Matsui et al50; figure 3).

Figure 6

Figure 7 (a) Software calculates natural strain by placing points at very short distances along the free walls of the foetal heart and calculating point strain. (b) Point strain shows marked segmental variation and the values are summed to provide an average point, or natural strain. (Reproduced by permission from Germanakis and Gardiner52; figures 4a and 4b).