Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:54:11.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geochronology of early Mesozoic diabase units in southwestern China: metallogenic and tectonic implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2018

LIANG QIU*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA
WEN-XIN YANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
DAN-PING YAN*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
MICHAEL L. WELLS
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA
JUN-TING QIU
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
TIAN GAO
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
JIAN-MENG DONG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
LIANGLIANG ZHANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
FANG-YUE WANG
Affiliation:
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
*
†Author for correspondence: yandp@cugb.edu.cn (D. Yan); qiul@cugb.edu.cn (L. Qiu)
†Author for correspondence: yandp@cugb.edu.cn (D. Yan); qiul@cugb.edu.cn (L. Qiu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two phases of diabase-sill-forming magmatism are recorded within the Badu anticline where magmas were emplaced into upper Palaeozoic carbonates and clastic rocks of the Youjiang fold-and-thrust belt in the SW South China Block, China. Zircons from these diabase units yield weighted mean U–Pb ages of 249.2±2.0 Ma and 187.1±3.3 Ma, and magmatic oxygen fugacity values from ‒20 to ‒6 (average of ‒12, equating to FMQ +5) and ‒20 to ‒10 (average of ‒15, equating to FMQ +2), respectively. These data indicate that the sills were emplaced during Early Triassic and Early Jurassic times. The discovery of c. 250 Ma mafic magmatism in this area was probably related to post-flood-basalt extension associated with the Emeishan mantle plume or rollback of the subducting Palaeo-Tethys slab. The c. 190 Ma diabase sills indicate that the southwestern South China Block records Early Jurassic mafic magmatism and lithospheric extension that was likely associated with a transition from post-collisional to within-plate tectonic regimes. The emplacement of diabase intrusions at depth may have driven hydrothermal systems, enabling the mobilization of elements from sedimentary rocks and causing the formation of a giant epigenetic metallogenic domain. The results indicate that high-oxygen-fugacity materials within basement rocks caused crustal contamination of the magmas, contributing to the wide range of oxygen fugacity conditions recorded by the Au-bearing Badu diabase. In addition, data from inherited xenocrystic zircons within the Badu diabase and detrital zircons from basement rocks suggest that the Neoproterozoic Jiangshao suture extends to the south of the Badu anticline.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map showing the tectonic setting of the South China Block and adjacent blocks (after Yan et al.2003; Faure et al.2014, 2016b; Qiu, L. et al.2014, 2016). The inset shows the continents and suture zones of East Asia (Metcalfe, 2013). Abbreviations: CB – Cathaysian Block; LS – Lhasa Block; WB – West Burma; QD – Qaidam Block; QS – Qamdo–Simao Block; QT – Qiangtang Block; SG – Songpan–Ganzi accretionary complex; YB – Yangtze Block.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Geological map of the Badu anticline within the Youjiang Basin (BGMRGX, 1985; Yang et al.2018) and (b) cross-section showing the relationship between Phanerozoic units and diabase dykes within the Badu anticline (BGMRGX, 1992).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Field photographs showing representative samples of diabase sills within the Youjiang fold-and-thrust belt. (a, b) Early Jurassic diabase sill intruded into Devonian sandstone (TL208), (c) detailed view of a diabase sill (TL208), (d–g) late-stage diabase sill (TL204-1) intruding an early-stage diabase sill (TL204-2 and-3) exposed within a riverbank (viewed from opposite directions), and (f) late-stage diabase sill shown in detail (TL204-1). Sample locations are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Photomicrographs showing representative examples of diabase sills within the Badu anticline. Abbreviations: Cpx – clinopyroxene; Ol – olivine; Opx – orthopyroxene; Pl – plagioclase.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Representative cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons showing the sites of U–Pb analyses. The majority of zircons were inherited xenocrysts and are therefore not shown in the CL images in order to focus on the youngest mafic magmatism. White circles indicate the locations of 206Pb/238U analytical spots using a laser diameter of 30 μm.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Zircon U–Pb concordia and weighted average diagrams for the Badu diabase.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns for zircons from the Badu sills, normalized to the chondrite composition of Boynton (1984).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Zircon crystallization temperatures and magma oxygen fugacity during the formation of the Badu diabase. The fayalite–magnetite–quartz (FMQ), magnetite–haematite (MH), and iron–wüstite (IW) buffers are from Myers & Eugster (1983). Filled circles indicate the youngest zircon populations.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Tectonic model of the post-orogenic extensional origin of the Badu diabase (modified after Wells et al. 2012; Qiu, L. et al. 2014). (a) Late Permian to Early Triassic diabase units with a peak age of c. 250 Ma were generated by post-flood-basalt extension associated with the Emeishan mantle plume or rollback of the subducting Palaeo-Tethyan slab. (b) Early Jurassic diabase intrusions with an age peak at ~190 Ma were derived during the Late Triassic transition from post-orogenic extension to within-plate tectonism.

Supplementary material: PDF

Qiu et al. supplementary material

Qiu et al. supplementary material 1

Download Qiu et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 354 KB
Supplementary material: File

Qiu et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Qiu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 100.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Qiu et al. supplementary material

Table S2

Download Qiu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 46.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Qiu et al. supplementary material

Table S3

Download Qiu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15.5 KB