1
The rare Latin word draucus is known almost exclusively from Martial. Older dictionaries and handbooks used to gloss the word as ‘sodomite’,Footnote 1 until Housman showed that draucus is in fact ‘as innocent a word as comoedus, and simply means one who performs feats of strength in public’.Footnote 2 Thus, Mart. 7.67.5–6 concerns weightlifting: gravesque draucis | halteras facili rotat lacerto (‘and with effortless arm she rotates weights that would tax a draucus’),Footnote 3 while 14.48 describes drauci playing hand-ball (harpastum): Haec rapit Antaei velox in pulvere draucus | grandia qui vano colla labore facit (‘These the swift draucus, who makes his neck big by futile toil,Footnote 4 snatches in Antaeus’ dust').
Other contexts represent the drauci as objects of sexual desire,Footnote 5 but never as active seekers of sexual pleasures.Footnote 6 That athletes were presented as models of sexual vigour is not surprising: as Housman and others have noted, it was customary for athletes to wear a ring-shaped fibula on the penis in order to preserve their strength;Footnote 7 once released from the fibula, they were believed to perform particularly well after a long period of forced chastity.Footnote 8 Summing up, the drauci in Martial are strong young men participating in ball games and often found physically attractive and desirable.
This exhausts the literary attestations of draucus.Footnote 9 There is one interesting epigraphic testimony:Footnote 10 a Latin defixio discovered south of Innsbruck in 1954 (Wilten, ancient Veldidena, AE [1961], 181) reads ut siquis *XIIII sive draucus Footnote 11duos sustulit, ‘whoever has stolen fourteen denarii or two draucos’ (lines 2–3). Clearly in this instance the word cannot have meant ‘young athletes’, and a coin called ‘draucus’ is unknown. Three solutions have been proposed. The most widely accepted is that of L. Franz, who identified draucos with the gloss ‘δραυκιον monile’ from the Greek–Latin glossary attributed to Cyril (CGL 2.280Footnote 12) and translated the word as ‘necklace’.Footnote 13 Other scholars have attempted to interpret the text starting with the attested usage of Latin draucus. R. Egger suggested a somewhat contrived scenario according to which draucus was used in the meaning ‘männliches Jungvieh’, and duos draucos therefore meant ‘two heads of cattle’.Footnote 14 Finally, H. Grassl proposed that drauci here are figurines, perhaps ithyphallic statuettes.Footnote 15 Grassl's interpretation appears plausible; if it is right, another attestation of the word draucus is obtained.Footnote 16
2
Every scholar who has addressed the etymology of the word has followed the TLL in assuming that draucus was borrowed from one of the dialects of the Ancient Gaul.Footnote 17 This approach is not unreasonable in itself: on the one hand, Latin is known to contain borrowings from Gaulish,Footnote 18 on the other hand, word-initial dr- is quite rare in Latin and mostly occurs in loanwords (e.g. drachma, draco, dromus, druidae). However, there is no certainty that the absence of initial dr- in inherited Latin vocabulary is due to a sound change rather than an accidental gap, and most authorities have remained agnostic as to the fate of initial *dr- in Latin.Footnote 19 An Indo-European etymology for draucus cannot be excluded a priori on the grounds of the phonological history of Latin. The evidence for the mainstream view of draucus as a Celtic loanword should therefore be revisited.
It turns out that there is no such evidence; all we have are a handful of attestations of Draucus as a personal name.Footnote 20 The name is found in several Roman provinces (although significantly not in Spain, where Martial could have picked the word up).Footnote 21 But even more important is the fact that Holder's Sprachschatz is notorious for including material that is unlikely to be Celtic, and the work has often been criticized precisely on these grounds. In our case, as far as I am aware, there is not a shred of direct evidence that draucus ever belonged to Gaulish vocabulary or onomasticon.Footnote 22
3
Under these circumstances a new solution is called for. Let us theorize that draucus is an inherited word that was avoided in the more elevated poetic genres, but survived in everyday Latin; it denoted an athletic young man and was stylistically comparable to contemporary English stud or hunk.Footnote 23 It would be no wonder that the word was first used by Martial given his penchant for colloquial and vulgar language.Footnote 24 The following scenario can now be explored.
Since in the prehistory of draucus a medial vowel may have been syncopated after -
- (compare *á
i-kap-s- > auceps ‘fowler’), we may posit an immediate preform *dra
iko-. Just as e.g. modicus ‘moderate’ was derived from modus ‘quantity, size’ or bellicus ‘military’ was derived from bellum ‘war’ with a suffix -iko-,Footnote 25 the hypothetical *dra
iko- could have been derived from a preform *dra
ó- which, in turn, may continue *dro
ó-.Footnote 26
At this point our reconstruction stops being an idle exercise in stringing together various hypotheses: there was an Indo-European adjective *dro
(H)ó-/*dre
(H)ó- ‘firm, strong’. It is directly continued in Greek δροός,Footnote 27 in Germanic *trewwa- ‘reliable, faithful, true’ (from *‘solid, steadfast’),Footnote 28 and perhaps in Slavic *(sъ)dravъ ‘healthy; strong’.Footnote 29 This adjective has traditionally been analysed as sharing the same root with *doru-, *dre
- ‘tree’: for semantics one may compare Latin rōbur ‘oak tree’ vs. rōbustus ‘physically strong’ or Greek πρῖνος ‘holm-oak’ vs. πρίνινος ‘sturdy’ (e.g. Ar. Ach. 180: Ἀχαρνικοί, στιπτοὶ γέροντες, πρίνινοι).Footnote 30
Backed-up with this comparative evidence, the reconstruction of *dro
(H)ó- ‘firm, strong’ > Proto-Italic *dra
ó- appears unproblematic.Footnote 31 The semantics and the form match seamlessly: an adjective *dra
iko- ‘strong’ was made from *dra
ó- ‘strong’,Footnote 32 resulting in Latin draucus ‘strong’, substantivized as draucus, -i, ‘strong man, stud, hunk’.