Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:11:45.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Landscape forest loss changes sunfleck dynamics in forest fragments of southern Bahia, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2021

Igor Pires Reis
Affiliation:
Applied Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, km 16, Salobrinho, Ilheus, Bahia CEP 45662-900, Brazil
Larissa Rocha-Santos
Affiliation:
Applied Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, km 16, Salobrinho, Ilheus, Bahia CEP 45662-900, Brazil
Adrielle Leal
Affiliation:
Applied Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, km 16, Salobrinho, Ilheus, Bahia CEP 45662-900, Brazil
Deborah Faria
Affiliation:
Applied Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, km 16, Salobrinho, Ilheus, Bahia CEP 45662-900, Brazil
Marcelo Schramm Mielke*
Affiliation:
Applied Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rodovia Jorge Amado, km 16, Salobrinho, Ilheus, Bahia CEP 45662-900, Brazil
*
Author for Correspondence: *Marcelo Schramm Mielke, Email: msmielke@uesc.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Landscape-scale habitat loss can change the floristic composition of forest fragments, affecting the survival of specific groups of plants, as shade-tolerant and emergent trees. This increasing in tree mortality creates forest canopy gaps of different sizes that ultimately determine the solar radiation available in the forest understorey. We conducted a study aiming to assess how the loss of forest cover at landscape level (i.e. deforestation) affects the sunfleck dynamics, a proxy of light regime in forest understorey. We expected that fragments located in landscapes with less forest cover have a high number of larger canopy gaps and, consequently, long-lasting sunflecks. In each forest fragment, a 100 per 50 m plot was established, and in each plot, we took 10 hemispherical photographs. The images were analysed using the Gap Light Analyzer software. The sunflecks were divided into six temporal classes. We evidenced that landscape-scale deforestation increased the frequency of all sunfleck intervals >8 min, particularly the long-lasting (> 32 min) sunflecks. We propose that the increasing frequency of long-lasting sunflecks reduces suitability of microhabitat to some shade-tolerant species in local fragments, a potential proximal mechanism contributing to compositional shifts of tree assemblages observed in forest fragments within deforested landscapes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Spatial distribution of the 18 forest fragments with their respective percentage of forest cover at landscape scale (1,400 m buffer), surveyed in southern Bahia, Brazil.

Figure 1

Table 1. Number of sunflecks in each of 18 forest fragments immersed in a gradient of forest cover amount (FC %) at landscape scale in south Bahia, Brazil, in total and along six classes of duration (min), the relative contribution of the classes to the total number of sunflecks, herein as average number of sunflecks, the total number of sunflecks, and the % contribution to the total

Figure 2

Table 2. Slope log values, standard error (SE), z value, and probability (p) for regressions of the number of sunflecks time classes (min) along a gradient of forest cover amount remaining at the landscapes (n = 18 fragments) in southern Bahia, Brazil

Figure 3

Figure 2. Relationship between the total number of sunflecks in six classes of duration (min) and the percentage of forest cover at landscape scale in 18 forest fragments of Atlantic rainforest in south Bahia, Brazil. Sunflecks time duration: (a) 2 > 4 min, (b) 4 > 8 min, (c) 8 > 16 min, (d) 16 > 32 min, (e) 32 > 64 min and (f) ≥ 64 min.

Supplementary material: PDF

Reis et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Reis et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 82.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Reis et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Reis et al. supplementary material(File)
File 31.4 KB