Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T17:35:27.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time-evolution of magma sources in a continental back-arc setting: the Cenozoic basalts from Sierra de San Bernardo (Patagonia, Chubut, Argentina)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2008

SANDRO BRUNI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Via S. Maria 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, C.N.R., Via Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
MASSIMO D'ORAZIO*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Via S. Maria 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, C.N.R., Via Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
MIGUEL J. HALLER
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, CENPAT-CONICET, Puerto Madryn, Argentina
FABRIZIO INNOCENTI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Via S. Maria 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, C.N.R., Via Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
PIERO MANETTI
Affiliation:
Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, C.N.R., Via Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, Italy Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via La Pira 4, I-50121 Florence, Italy
ZOLTÁN PÉCSKAY
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
SONIA TONARINI
Affiliation:
Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, C.N.R., Via Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
*
‡Author for correspondence: dorazio@dst.unipi.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

East of the Patagonian Andes, mafic volcanic rocks (mainly lava flows and scoriae) are exposed in the Sierra de San Bernardo fold belt and neighbouring areas (central Patagonia; 44.5–46° S, 69–71° W). They were erupted over a wide interval of time (late Eocene–Pleistocene; 14 new K–Ar ages), and show systematic chemical and Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic variations in time. The alkaline lavas (Mg number 57–66) erupted during the late Eocene and early Miocene, have an intraplate geochemical affinity, and have the highest 143Nd/144Nd and 206Pb/204Pb and the lowest 87Sr/86Sr ratios of the dataset. Their compositions indicate that their depth of equilibration in the mantle was greater than that of subsequent lavas. In contrast, the Plio-Pleistocene alkaline lavas (Mg number 58–71) are the most enriched in incompatible elements, still showing an intra-plate signature, and have the lowest 143Nd/144Nd and 206Pb/204Pb and the highest 87Sr/86Sr ratios. A distinctive group of early Miocene subalkaline lavas is characterized by slightly more evolved compositions (Mg number 56–59), coupled with very low incompatible element contents, flat LREE and fractionated HREE patterns (‘kinked’ pattern), and intermediate Sr–Nd–Pb isotope compositions. The Pleistocene basanites (Mg number 71–72) from the Cerro Ante monogenetic cone, on the easternmost slopes of the Patagonian Andes, have a marked orogenic geochemical signature and Sr–Nd–Pb isotope ratios that overlap with those of volcanic rocks from the adjacent active Andean arc. They originated in a mantle source extensively modified by the addition of materials from the subducting Pacific oceanic plates. We suggest that the wide chemical and isotopic variability of the Sierra de San Bernardo lavas reflects the upwelling of asthenospheric mantle beneath the study area, which induced lithospheric erosion and progressive involvement of enriched mantle domains in the genesis of magmas. In this context, late Eocene and early Miocene alkaline magmatism was dominantly sourced from the asthenospheric mantle, whereas Plio-Pleistocene alkaline magmas contain the largest proportion of an enriched lithospheric component. The peculiar compositional features of the early Miocene subalkaline lavas are interpreted in terms of high-degree mantle melting followed by melt–lithospheric mantle reaction processes. Based on current knowledge about the relative movement and decoupling between lithosphere and asthenosphere, we propose that the asthenosphere below the study area rose up to compensate for the westward drift of the mantle wedge coupled with the South American lithosphere.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic geodynamic setting of southern South America and the adjacent Pacific Ocean. The sketch shows: the fracture zones of the oceanic Nazca and Antarctic plates (thin continuous lines), the Chile oceanic spreading ridge (grey strips), the Chile trench (heavy continuous line with triangles on the overriding plate), the transcurrent margin between the Scotia and South American plates (dashed line), the Chile Triple Junction, the main active volcanoes of the Southern South Volcanic Zone (SSVZ) and Austral Volcanic Zone (AVZ) of the Andes (black smoking triangles), the Cenozoic Patagonian lavas (black areas). The two large, black arrows are the convergence vectors of the Nazca and Antarctic plates with respect to South America according to the HS3-NUVEL-1A model (Gripp & Gordon, 2002). Circled numbers indicate the main Patagonian basalt occurrences cited in the text: 1 – Pali Aike Volcanic Field (late Pliocene–Quaternary); 2 – Estancia Glencross area (late Miocene); 3 – Meseta de las Vizcachas (middle Miocene–late Pliocene); 4 – C. del Fraile (late Pliocene–Quaternary); 5 – Camusú Aike Volcanic Field (late Pliocene); 6 – Mesetas on the north side of the Río Santa Cruz valley (Laguna Amenida–Condor Cliff area; Miocene?–late Pliocene); 7 – Meseta del Viento (early Pliocene–late Pliocene); 8 – Meseta de la Muerte and Meseta Strobel (middle Miocene–early Pliocene); 9 – Meseta Central (late Miocene–late Pliocene); 10 – Mesetas of the Northeast region (Eocene–late Pliocene); 11 – Meseta Belgrano (late Miocene–late Pliocene); 12 – Meseta del Lago Buenos Aires and Meseta Chile Chico (Paleocene–Quaternary). The rectangle encloses the study area.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Geological sketch map of the study area, redrawn and largely simplified from Lizuain, Ragona & Folguera (1995).

Figure 2

Table 1 K–Ar data

Figure 3

Figure 3. Distribution of new and literature K–Ar ages for mafic lavas from the study area.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Total alkali v. silica classification diagram for the studied rocks. Inset: K2O/Na2O v. K2O plot.

Figure 5

Table 2 Whole-rock major and trace element analyses

Figure 6

Figure 5. Binary plots illustrating some chemical features of Sierra de San Bernardo and Cerro Ante lavas (symbols as in Fig. 4). (a) Ni (ppm) v. MgO (wt %) plot showing the primitive nature of the studied samples; (b) P2O5 (wt %) v. TiO2 (wt %) plot showing the rough correlation of these elements in Sierra de San Bernardo lavas, and the very high P2O5/TiO2 of basanites from Cerro Ante; (c) Mg number v. Fe2O3 tot (wt %) plot showing the high and low total iron contents of group Ia and Cerro Ante lavas, respectively.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Primordial mantle-normalized incompatible element patterns. (a) Groups Ia and Is; (b) groups IINa, IIK and Cerro Ante. Normalizing values after McDonough & Sun (1995).

Figure 8

Figure 7. CI chondrite-normalized REE patterns. (a) Groups Ia and Is; (b) groups IINa and IIK; (c) Cerro Ante. Normalizing values after McDonough & Sun (1995).

Figure 9

Table 3 Sr–Nd–Pb isotope data

Figure 10

Figure 8. 143Nd/144Nd v. 87Sr/86Sr plot for the studied samples (symbols as in Fig. 4). Also shown are the fields for the Cenozoic volcanic rocks from the Antarctic Peninsula (Hole, Kempton & Millar, 1993; Hole et al. 1995; D'Orazio et al. 1999), extra-Andean Patagonia from 46.5 to 50.5° S (Stern et al. 1990; Gorring & Kay, 2001; D'Orazio et al. 2005; Gorring et al. 2003), the Oligo-Miocene Somuncura Province (Kay et al. 2007), the Pali Aike volcanic field and Estancia Glencross area (D'Orazio et al. 2000, 2001), the Chile Ridge (segments 1, 2, 4; Sturm et al. 1999), and the Southern South Volcanic Zone (SSVZ) and Austral Volcanic Zone (AVZ) of the Andes (Hickey, Frey & Gerlach, 1986; Hickey-Vargas et al. 1989; Futa & Stern, 1988; Gerlach et al. 1988; López-Escobar et al. 1993, 1995; Stern & Kilian, 1996; D'Orazio et al. 2003). BE – Bulk Earth.

Figure 11

Figure 9. 207Pb/204Pb v. 206Pb/204Pb (a) and 208Pb/204Pb v. 206Pb/204Pb (b) plots for the studied samples (symbols as in Fig. 4). The diagram also shows the Northern Hemisphere Reference Line (NHRL; Hart, 1984). Data sources and abbreviations: see Figure 8 caption.

Figure 12

Figure 10. 87Sr/86Sr v. 206Pb/204Pb plot for the studied samples (symbols as in Fig. 4). Data sources and abbreviations: see Figure 8 caption.

Figure 13

Figure 11. Rb/Nb v. K/P plot for the studied samples. The diagram also shows the field for the Southern South Volcanic Zone of the Andes (SSVZ) volcanic rocks with MgO > 3 wt %, the average values for E-MORB and OIB (Sun & McDonough, 1989), the average value of the Upper Continental Crust (Taylor & McLennan, 1995), and the range for the Chon Aike Jurassic rhyolites (Pankhurst & Rapela, 1995).

Figure 14

Figure 12. Sr/Nd v. 87Sr/86Sr (a) and 143Nd/144Nd v. 87Sr/86Sr (b) plots showing the results of EC-AFC (energy constrained-assimilation fractional crystallization) modelling (Spera & Bohrson, 2001; symbols as in Fig. 4). The Patagonian lower crust contaminant (Sr = 625 ppm, Nd = 4.1 ppm, 87Sr/86Sr = 0.70695, 143Nd/144Nd = 0.51237) was estimated by averaging the compositions of mafic granulite xenoliths from Sierra de los Chacays (Pankhurst & Rapela, 1995). The basalt magma composition before contamination was approximated assuming that it had the REE concentrations (Nd = 8.5 ppm) of a subalkaline silicate melt obtained by 15 % partial melting of a garnet-bearing pyrolite source, and Sr/Nd, 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd ratios of group Ia lavas. In particular, in the calculations we selected Eocene sample PA-426, characterized by the most depleted Sr–Nd isotope composition and, as an alternative, Miocene sample PA-417, showing the most enriched Sr–Nd isotope composition. Thermal and thermodynamic parameters and bulk partition coefficients for Nd and Sr are those used by Spera & Bohrson (2001) for their lower crust assimilation example, except for the Sr bulk partition coefficient in the crystallizing basalt magma, that has been taken equal to 0.05. Numbers on tick marks are the mass of assimilated material (Ma) and the mass of cumulates (Mc), respectively, both referred to a unitary mass of initial magma.

Figure 15

Figure 13. Three-dimensional plot of 87Sr/86Sr, 143Nd/144Nd and 206Pb/204Pb for Sierra de San Bernardo and Cerro Ante samples, using the four end-members DMM, EM I, EM II and HIMU at the vertices of the tetrahedron (end-member compositions after Hart et al. 1992; symbols as in Fig. 4).

Figure 16

Figure 14. 143Nd/144Nd v. 87Sr/86Sr plot for Patagonian mantle xenoliths. Data sources: Pali Aike: Stern et al. (1999) and Kempton et al. (1999); Estancia Lote 17: Gorring & Kay (2000) and Conceição et al. (2005); Cerro Redondo: Schilling et al. (2005); Tres Lagos: Ntaflos et al. (2007); Cerro de los Chenques: Rivalenti et al. (2007). Abbreviations: WR – whole rock; CPX – clinopyroxene; PHL – phlogopite; AMPH – amphibole.

Figure 17

Figure 15. Schematic illustration showing the geodynamic model for Cenozoic mafic magmatism in central Patagonia. (a) Magmatism started during the late Eocene, when the asthenosphere welled up to compensate for the westward drift of the mantle wedge associated with the South American Plate and melted by adiabatic decompression. (b) Progressive lithospheric erosion induced by the upwelling of the asthenospheric mantle activated more isotopically enriched sources that produced the subsequent Miocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene lavas. The Pleistocene lavas from Cerro Ante, located between the Andean Arc and Sierra de San Bernardo, were sourced from a mantle domain extensively modified by subduction-related components (hatched area).