Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T10:10:24.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Production of customized hybrid porous structures by powder metallurgy of Ni59Zr20Ti16Si2Sn3 glassy powders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2013

Sergio Scudino*
Affiliation:
IFW Dresden, Institut für Komplexe Materialien, D-01171 Dresden, Germany
Jin Young Kim
Affiliation:
IFW Dresden, Institut für Komplexe Materialien, D-01171 Dresden, Germany
Konda Gokuldoss Prashanth
Affiliation:
IFW Dresden, Institut für Komplexe Materialien, D-01171 Dresden, Germany
Min Ha Lee
Affiliation:
Korea Institute for Rare Metals, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Incheon 406-840, Korea
Bum Sung Kim
Affiliation:
Korea Institute for Rare Metals, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Incheon 406-840, Korea
Uta Kühn
Affiliation:
IFW Dresden, Institut für Komplexe Materialien, D-01171 Dresden, Germany
Jürgen Eckert
Affiliation:
IFW Dresden, Institut für Komplexe Materialien, D-01171 Dresden, Germany; and TU Dresden, InstitutfürWerkstoffwissenschaft, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: s.scudino@ifw-dresden.de

Abstract

Among the different porous materials, bulk metallic glass (BMG) foams are of special interest due to their high strength combined with large elastic limit. Large surface areas and, therefore, high reactivity in chemical applications can be achieved by properly adjusting the pore characteristics. Pore size and pore size distribution are the key factors for determining the overall performance of open-cell porous materials used for functional applications, such as filtration or catalysis. As a result, the control of these factors is a necessary requirement for material design and application. In this work, BMG foams are produced by powder metallurgy through the selective dissolution of a fugitive phase. The work is focused on the manufacturing processes needed to properly control pore size and pore size distribution. The results reveal that customized hybrid BMG porous structures can be produced through the controlled milling of the BMG-composite powders.

Figure 0

FIG. 1.OM micrographs of the starting (a) gas-atomized Ni59Zr20Ti16Si2Sn3 glassy and (b) brass powders and of the glass–brass composite powders milled for (c) 5, (d) 10, (e) 15, and (f) 20 h.

Figure 1

FIG. 2.(a) DSC scans (30 K/min) of as-atomized Ni59Zr20Ti16Si2Sn3 glass–brass composite powders milled for 5 and 20 h, porous powder obtained from the powder milled for 20 h by selective dissolution of brass (20 h porous) and BMG foam produced from the powder milled for 20 h with particle size d < 125 μm (20 h bulk porous). (b) Crystallization enthalpy of the milled powders as a function of the milling time (full symbols) and of the porous powder produced from the powder milled for 20 h by selective dissolution of brass (open symbol).

Figure 2

FIG. 3.XRD patterns (Co Kα radiation) for the as-atomized Ni59Zr20Ti16Si2Sn3 glass–brass composite powders milled for 5 and 20 h, porous powder obtained from the powder milled for 20 h by selective dissolution of brass (20 h porous) and BMG foam produced from the powder milled for 20 h with particle size d < 125 μm (20 h bulk porous).

Figure 3

FIG. 4.Temperature dependence (heating rate 30 K/min) of the viscosity for the as-atomized Ni59Zr20Ti16Si2Sn3 powder and for the glass–brass composite powder milled for 20 h.

Figure 4

FIG. 5.Microstructure of the consolidated bulk precursors along the transverse direction (normal to the extrusion direction) [(a)–(e)] and corresponding porous specimens [(f)–(o)] produced from the following glass–brass mixtures: [(a), (f), (k)] manually blended; [(b), (g), (l)] milled (particle size d < 450 μm); [(c), (h), (m)] milled (d < 125 μm); (d, i, n) 1:1 mixture blended and milled (d < 450 μm); and (e, j, o) 1:1 mixture blended and milled (d < 125 μm).

Figure 5

FIG. 6.Microstructure of (a) consolidated bulk precursor produced from the milled particles with size below 125 μm viewed along the extrusion direction and (b) the corresponding porous specimen.

Figure 6

FIG. 7.Distributions of (a) pore thickness, (b) pore width along the transverse direction, and (c) pore length along the extrusion direction for the different porous metallic glasses. (d) Values of the specific surface area of the porous materials estimated from the data of Lee and Sordelet14 (solid line) using the average pore thickness (arrows).