Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T14:32:07.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in the helminth community structure of Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echimyidae) in two sub-regions of the Brazilian Pantanal: the effects of land use and seasonality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2009

R. Simões,
R. Gentile,
V. Rademaker,
P. D'Andrea,
H. Herrera,
T. Freitas,
R. Lanfredi and
A. Maldonado Jr
R. Simões
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365 Manguinhos, 21045-900Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
R. Gentile
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365 Manguinhos, 21045-900Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
V. Rademaker
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia de Tripanosomatídeos, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365 Manguinhos, 21045-900Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
P. D'Andrea
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365 Manguinhos, 21045-900Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
H. Herrera
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia de Tripanosomatídeos, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365 Manguinhos, 21045-900Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
T. Freitas
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365 Manguinhos, 21045-900Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Av. Fernando Correia da Costa, sem número Coxipó, 78060-900Cuiabá, MT, Brasil
R. Lanfredi
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia de Helmintos Otto Wucherer, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, CCS, bl. G. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Ilha do Fundão, 21949-900Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
A. Maldonado Jr*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365 Manguinhos, 21045-900Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
*
*Fax: +55-21-25621253 E-mail: maldonad@ioc.fiocruz.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Pantanal is a large ecosystem located in South America. This preserved area is seasonally flooded due to abundant rainfall during the summer and the subsequent overflow of the Paraguai River. In this paper, we examine the helminth community structure in the wild rodent Thrichomys pachyurus during the wet and dry seasons in two locations of the preserved and cattle ranching areas in the Southern Pantanal. We identified 12 species of helminth, and, although we did not find any differences in species richness between locations within the Pantanal, we found that richness was higher during the wet season. Helminth species were largely aggregated in both farm locations and during seasons. The most common helminth species were more abundant during the dry season than during the wet season, which may have been due to the increased habitat availability and rodent population increase. The intensity of the infection also followed the same pattern for most helminths. The trichostrongylids (Heligmostrongylus crucifer, H. almeidai and Pudica cercomysi) were dominant at both farm locations. The land use of each area was not correlated with helminth diversity. However, species composition of the helminth community of T. pachyurus differed between locations and may be correlated with environmental differences between the habitats. The seasonality of the Pantanal was highly correlated with helminth parasitism in T. pachyurus.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 84 , Issue 3 , September 2010, pp. 266 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Introduction

The structure of parasite communities is influenced by several factors, including biogeography and abiotic parameters (environmental factors) as well as host density and life history (Abu-Madi et al., Reference Abu-Madi, Behnke, Lewis and Gilbert2000). Helminth communities are also influenced by host–parasite and parasite–parasite interactions within the host (Poulin, Reference Poulin2001). In discrete or isolated host populations, susceptibility to infection by parasitic organisms is strongly influenced by intrinsic host factors, including age and life history (Barnard et al., Reference Barnard, Behnke, Bajer, Bray, Race, Frake, Osmond, Dinmore and Sinski2002; Behnke, Reference Behnke2008).

Comparing parasitological parameters of a specific host species in different habitats may be an important approach in evaluating the impact of environmental factors on helminth community structure and host–parasite relationships. Moreover, climatic factors are known to influence the development of free-living stages of parasites and can affect survival, transmission and host infection (Haukisalmi & Henttonen, Reference Haukisalmi and Henttonen1990; Behnke, Reference Behnke2008).

Helminth parasites have been studied extensively in European rodents (Montgomery & Montgomery, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1990; Behnke et al., Reference Behnke, Lewis, Mohd Zain and Gilbert1999, Reference Behnke, Barnard, Bajer, Bray, Dinmore, Frake, Osmond, Race and Sinski2001; Fuentes et al., Reference Fuentes, Sáez, Trelis, Galán-Puchades and Esteban2004; Sainz-Elipe et al., Reference Sainz-Elipe, Galán-Puchades and Fuentes2007). Most helminth studies focusing on Brazilian mammals are strictly taxonomic reports (Travassos, Reference Travassos1927; Travassos & Freitas, Reference Travassos and Freitas1941; Gomes et al., Reference Gomes, Cruz, Vicente and Pinto2003; Durette-Desset et al., Reference Durette-Desset, Goncalves and Pinto2006). The helminth community structure of Brazilian rodents has been reported for Nectomys squamipes in the Atlantic Forest (Maldonado Jr et al., Reference Maldonado, Gentile, Fernandes-Moraes, D'Andrea, Lanfredi and Rey2006). In the Brazilian Pantanal, studies of small mammal helminths have been performed only for the marsupial Gracilinannus agilis (Feijó et al., Reference Feijó, Lopes Torres, Maldonado and Lanfredi2008; Lopes Torres et al., Reference Lopes Torres, Maldonado and Lanfredi2009).

Species of the genus Thrichomys (Rodentia: Caviomorpha) occupy diverse ecosystems in South America. Thrichomys pachyurus is a widespread rodent from Paraguay to western Brazil, occurring in the Pantanal biome (Bonvicino et al., Reference Bonvicino, Otazu and D'Andrea2002; Braggio & Bonvicino, Reference Braggio and Bonvicino2004). The species has a long gestation period of approximately 3 months and small litter size, with an average of 2.5 ± 0.9 offspring (Teixeira et al., Reference Teixeira, Roque, Barreiros-Gomez, Borodin, Jansen and D'Andrea2005). Recent parasitological studies of Thrichomys in the wild have shown its involvement in the transmission cycles of Trypanosoma cruzi (L. Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, D'Andrea, Xavier, Mangia, Fernandes and Jansen2005; Xavier et al., Reference Xavier, Vaz, D'Andrea, Herrera, Emperaire, Alves, Fernandes, Ferreira and Jansen2007). In the areas studied, this rodent species is abundant and is often infected with T. evansi, a flagellate that causes severe disease in horses and dogs (H.M. Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Norek, Freitas, Rademaker, Fernandes and Jansen2005, Reference Herrera, Rademaker, Abreu, D'Andrea and Jansen2007).

The effects of land use and seasonal floodplain events on the helminth community structure have remained unclear in the Pantanal region. In this study, we evaluated and compared the helminth community structure and the parasitological parameters of T. pachyurus in two Brazilian Pantanal locations with different land-use histories. We considered the effects of these different areas and the effects of Pantanal seasonality on variation in the respective helminth communities.

Materials and methods

Collecting sites

The Pantanal is a large ecosystem located in central South America, with a seasonal floodplain that varies with local rainfall and flooding of the Paraguai River. Although the Pantanal is a distinct ecosystem, it is dominated by species of the Cerrado biome and contains areas that differ in landscape and hydrological characteristics, forming a mosaic of local hydrological conditions, soil types and vegetation communities. Local climatic conditions are divided into two distinct seasons, which are the wet (summer and autumn) and dry (winter and spring) seasons. During the wet season, the local fauna share restricted areas and resources that are reduced in their availability. Another important feature of this region is the increase of ranching activities and the consequent habitat disturbance, which modify the characteristics of this environment and increase contact between wildlife and domestic animals (H.M. Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Rademaker, Abreu, D'Andrea and Jansen2007). This may predispose the area to an increase in the transmission of helminths from low-specificity hosts to more distantly related hosts.

The study was performed at two farms in the Brazilian Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul State. The first site was the Rio Negro Farm, located in the sub-region of Aquidauana (19°34′54″S, 056°14′62″W). This area is a private, protected area used for ecological tourism and scientific research by Conservation International. The second research site was the Alegria Farm, situated in the municipal district of Corumbá (19°15′01″S, 057°01′29″W). This site is a private ranch used primarily for cattle breeding. In both sites, the landscape includes the following elements: (a) ‘cerrado’, characterized by small, twisted or gnarled trees that are thinly spaced by herbaceous layers formed by grasses and shrubs; (b) ‘cordilheira’, which is characterized by higher ground that is covered by dense, semi-deciduous forest and is free of seasonal floods; (c) ‘grassland’, characterized by open fields that are eventually flooded under great inundations; and (d) ‘edge of lakes’, which is characterized by areas that are covered by grass and are seasonally flooded.

The climate is sub-humid tropical with two distinct seasons: the rainy summer from October to April and the dry winter from May to September. The average annual temperature of the region is 26.9°C during the summer and 23.7°C during the winter, with a mean annual rainfall of 1066 mm.

Parasitological procedures

Small mammals were trapped between February and June 2002 at the Rio Negro Farm, and between February and September 2003 at the Alegria Farm. Each trapping session consisted of 5 days. Traps were placed in four transects representing different habitats: cerrados, cordilheiras, grassland and edge of lakes. Each transect had four trapping stations spaced 20 m apart. At each station, two live-traps, a Tomahawk® trap (model 201; 16 × 5 × 5 inches (40.6 × 12.7 × 12.7 cm)) and a Sherman® trap (model XLK; 3 × 3.75 × 12 inches (7.6 × 9.5 × 30.5 cm)) were placed on the ground. Traps were baited with a mixture of peanut butter, banana, oatmeal, bacon and manioc, and were checked daily in the morning.

Captured Thrichomys pachyurus were transported to a base camp for euthanasia and necropsy. All animals were preserved by taxidermy and deposited as voucher specimens in the Mammal Collection of the National Museum in Rio de Janeiro State. All animal procedures followed the guidelines for capture, handling and care of mammals of the American Society of Mammalogy and the bio-security procedures of the Brazilian Health Ministry. Animals were collected under the authority of the Brazilian Government Institute for Wildlife and Natural Resources (IBAMA, CGFAU 009/2002 and CGFAU 137/2002). Bio-security techniques and individual safety equipment were used during all procedures involving animals or biological samples (Lemos & D'Andrea, Reference Lemos, D'Andrea, Martins, Martins, Silva, Lopes, Moreno and Silva2006).

We examined the abdominal and thoracic cavities of the rodents for helminths, searching the oesophagus, stomach, small and large intestines, liver, pancreas, kidneys, lungs, heart and gall bladder. Organs were separated in Petri dishes and dissected under a stereomicroscope to remove small helminths. Collected parasites were washed twice in saline in order to remove tissue debris and were fixed in hot AFA (2% acetic acid, 3% formaldehyde and 95% ethanol). Specimens were cleaned in LAF (40% lactophenol, 20% acid lactic and 20% phenol, in water) for later species identification (Yamaguti, Reference Yamaguti1961; Durette-Desset & Chabaud, Reference Durette-Desset and Chabaud1981; Durette-Desset, Reference Durette-Desset1985; Vicente et al., Reference Vicente, Rodrigues, Gomes and Pinto1997).

Data analysis

Helminth species richness was considered to be the number of species present. Helminth diversity was calculated using the Shannon index (H′) and compared using H max and H min (Ludwig & Reynolds, Reference Ludwig and Reynolds1988; Magurram, Reference Magurram1988). Helminth richness and diversity were calculated at each farm, for each season and for the entire dataset.

The distribution pattern of each helminth species was determined using the index of dispersion, calculated as the ratio between the variance of parasite abundance and the mean of parasite abundance (Ludwig & Reynolds, Reference Ludwig and Reynolds1988; Bush et al., Reference Bush, Fernandez, Esch and Seed2001; Combes, Reference Combes2001). If the ratio was close to one, the distribution was considered to be random; if it was less than one, distribution was regular; if it was greater than one, distribution was aggregated. In the latter case, the higher the variance to mean ratio, the more aggregated the distribution.

To analyse helminth community structure, we considered prevalence, intensity of infection and abundance of each species, taking into account all captured rodents and using methods described by Bush et al. (Reference Bush, Lafferty, Lotz and Shostak1997). Each community parameter was also compared between seasons and farms, using a 2 × 2 contingency chi-square test whenever possible. When a helminth species occurred in only one farm, we compared abundance between seasons using a chi-square goodness of fit test (Zar, Reference Zar1999). The presence/absence of each helminth was analysed considering both location and season using a logistic regression with a stepwise backward likelihood ratio model.

We investigated the co-occurrence of helminths by examining the Spearman correlations of the intensities for each pair of helminths. Since data were not normally distributed, only rodents that contained both species of a particular pair were considered in this analysis (Zar, Reference Zar1999). The Jaccard index of species association (Ludwig & Reynolds, Reference Ludwig and Reynolds1988) was calculated for each pair of species with sufficient data, in order to investigate relationships between helminth species.

The helminth community structure was characterized according to Thul et al. (Reference Thul, Forrester and Abercrombie1985). We used an importance index to classify each helminth species in the community, based on the number of infected hosts and the number of individuals of each parasite species. The more parasites and number of animals infected with a parasite, the more dominant a parasite was considered in the community. The importance value, I, was calculated for each helminth species as follows:

I _{j} = M _{j}\times \left [{{ {( A _{j}\times B _{j})}}\over{{\sum _{i}( A _{i}\times B _{i})}}}\right ]\times 100,

where A = number of individual parasites of a particular species; B = number of hosts infected with parasites of that species; j is the parasite species considered, i is any parasite species, and M is a maturation factor equal to 1.0 if at least one mature individual of the species considered was found, and otherwise equal to 0. If the importance index I ≥ 1.0, the species was considered to be a dominant species; 0.01 ≤ I ≤ 1.0 identified co-dominant species which contributed significantly to the community, though to a lesser degree than dominant species; 0 < I < 0.01 characterized subordinate species that occurred infrequently, and, although they may have developed and reproduced, they did not contribute significantly to the community; and I = 0 characterized unsuccessful pioneer species that had gained access to a host but were not able to mature or reproduce, they contributed little to the community and were characteristic of another host (Thul et al., Reference Thul, Forrester and Abercrombie1985). Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.

Results

Helminth species richness

Seventy specimens of Thrichomys pachyurus were collected during this study. Eighteen animals were collected during the wet season and 14 during the dry season at the Rio Negro Farm. At the Alegria Farm, 26 T. pachyurus were collected during the wet season and 12 during the dry season (table 1).

Table 1

Number of host animals analysed in each study area and season.

a One animal was not sexed.

The overall helminth richness was 12 species and there was no difference between locations. At both Rio Negro and Alegria, the richness was greater during the rainy season, although this difference was not significant. Further, there was no significant difference in diversity between seasons (table 2).

Table 2

Richness and diversity indices of helminths recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

H′, Shannon diversity index, H max, maximum diversity index; H min, minimum diversity index.

Helminth species recovered from the rodents in Rio Negro included the nematodes Heligmostrongylus crucifer, H. almeidai, H. interrogans, Pudica cercomysi, P. maldonadoi, Thrichuris sp., Avellaria intermedia and Stilestrongylus inexpectatus. The latter three species were observed only during the wet season. Only one species of Cestoda Raillietina sp. was recorded. The helminth species recovered from rodents in Alegria included the nematodes H. crucifer, H. almeidai, H. interrogans, P. cercomysi, Thrichuris sp., Paraspidodera uncinata and Physocephalus lassancei. Thrichuris sp. was observed only during the dry season, and P. lassancei was only found during the wet season. Two species of Cestoda were also observed: Raillietina sp. and Rodentolepis sp. The latter species was only detected once in one host during the dry season. All helminths were recovered from the small intestine except P. uncinata, which was found in the large intestine, and P. lassancei, which was recovered from the stomach.

Helminth distribution and infection levels

The distribution of most nematode helminths was highly aggregated (table 3). In particular, the trichostrongylids H. almeidai and H. crucifer showed aggregated distributions at both farms during both seasons. Heligmostrongylus interrogans was randomly distributed in Rio Negro during the wet season, and P. cercomysi was randomly distributed during the dry season. Avellaria intermedia showed an aggregated distribution in Rio Negro during the wet season. The distribution of Thrichuris sp. was aggregated in Rio Negro and Alegria during the dry season and was randomly distributed in Rio Negro during the wet season. The distribution of P. uncinata was aggregated in Alegria during the dry season. The cestoda Raillietina sp. was consistently randomly distributed (table 3). The distributions of other species could not be adequately evaluated.

Table 3

Dispersion indices for each helminth recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

The nematode H. interrogans showed significantly higher abundance in Alegria during the dry season, and P. cercomysi showed significantly higher abundance in Rio Negro during the wet season (tables 4 and 5). The other species did not show any significant differences in abundance between farms or seasons (tables 4 and 5). The highest abundances in Rio Negro were observed for H. almeidai and in Alegria for H. crucifer (table 4).

Table 4

Abundance, intensity and prevalence (95% confidence limits) of each helminth species recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

Table 5

Results of the chi-square test for abundance, intensity and prevalence in relation to farm and season for each helminth recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

* Significant results.

In Rio Negro, P. cercomysi was much more abundant during the wet season and H. almeidai and A. intermedia were more abundant during the dry season; these species were abundant in this farm location (tables 4 and 5). Heligmostrongylus crucifer and H. interrogans were more abundant in Alegria during the dry season and were most abundant in this farm (tables 4 and 5).

Most species (H. crucifer, H. interrogans, P. cercomysi, P. uncinata and Raillietina sp.) were more abundant in Alegria during the dry season (tables 4 and 5). Only Trichuris sp. showed significantly higher prevalence in Rio Negro, also during the dry season (tables 4 and 5).

The logistic regression analysis assessing the presence of the helminths with respect to both the location and season showed that, for H. almeidai, Thrichuris sp. and Raillietina sp., the season exerted a stronger influence on species presence than the location (table 6). For H. crucifer, H. interrogans, P. maldonadoi, A. intermedia and P. cercomysi, no significant differences were found between locations or seasons. Other species could not be tested.

Table 6

Significant results of the stepwise logistic regression of presence/absence of each helminth recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil, considering the location and the season.

There were no significant correlations between the helminth intensities of infection (table 7). The Jaccard indices of association did not show co-occurrence or segregation between any pair of helminth species (table 8). The nematodes H. crucifer, H. almeidai and P. cercomysi were dominant at both Rio Negro and Alegria (table 9). Trichuris sp., A. intermedia and Raillietina sp. were dominant only in Rio Negro, and H. interrogans and P. uncinata were dominant only in Alegria (table 9). The other helminths were either co-dominant or unsuccessful pioneer species at both farms (table 9).

Table 7

Spearman correlation coefficients of the intensities of infection between helminths recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil. Samples sizes (number of host animals) are in parentheses.

Table 8

Jaccard indices of association between helminth species recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

Table 9

Importance indices for the helminths on the Rio Negro (RN) and Alegria (A) Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

Discussion

Thrichomys pachyurus is an abundant rodent in the Pantanal and acts as a wild reservoir for T. cruzi and T. evansi (H.M. Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Rademaker, Abreu, D'Andrea and Jansen2007). Studies have investigated other parasites and their life cycles in this caviomorph rodent species.

This is the first report on the helminth fauna of T. pachyurus with new records of the geographic distributions for most of the helminth species. Four of the ten sampled nematode species were previously registered in another biome for the closely related species T. apereoides which lives in the Brazilian Cerrado and Caatinga. Although H. crucifer had only been observed in the Pantanal, H. almeidai, H. interrogans and S. inexpectatus have been described previously in the Caatinga, and S. inexpectatus has also been described in Cerrado. The larger helminth diversity in T. pachyurus when compared with congeneric species from the Caatinga and Cerrado suggests an environmental adaptation of life cycles of most helminths to the Pantanal habitat, which is more humid than other biomes, in spite of the influence of the surrounding Cerrado on the Pantanal fauna (Alho & Gonçalves, Reference Alho and Gonçalves2005). In addition, the great diversity of helminth species found in this rodent could have resulted from sharing the habitat with other mammals. The infection of T. pachyurus likely results from sharing the habitat with other rodents and deer during the flood periods. Indeed, P. lassancei has been described from the stomach of the cervid Mazama simplicicornis from Lassance, Minas Gerais State (Cuocolo, Reference Cuocolo1943). This genus preferentially inhabits forested areas in Pantanal (Rivero et al., Reference Rivero, Rimiz and Taber2005), and T. pachyurus are found preferentially in this habitat in the ‘cordilheiras’ (H.M. Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Rademaker, Abreu, D'Andrea and Jansen2007). Thus, these two species may overlap during the flood season.

Paraspidodera uncinata is a parasite of the large intestine of Cavia porcellus, C. aperea and C. fulgida and has been found infecting caviomorph rodents of the families Cavidae and Agoutidae (Travassos & Freitas, Reference Travassos and Freitas1948; Pinto et al., Reference Pinto, Gomes, Muniz-Pereira and Noronha2002). Moreover, it has also been reported infecting lagomorphs (Vicente et al., Reference Vicente, Rodrigues, Gomes and Pinto1997), demonstrating that it has little vertebrate host specificity. Although this is the first report of P. uncinata infecting T. pachyurus, previous studies have reported this nematode infecting Cavia sp. in Mato Grosso do Sul State (Travassos & Freitas, Reference Travassos and Freitas1941). Further, a Cavia sp. was trapped in the same habitat where the rodents were collected, reinforcing the importance of co-habitation as a determinant of co-occurring parasites. Likewise, A. intermedia has also been observed infecting caviomorph rodents such as Dasyprocta fuliginosa in Jauari, Amazonas (Durette-Desset et al., Reference Durette-Desset, Goncalves and Pinto2006).

Extrinsic factors play a major role in determining the structure of helminth communities, with strong evidence in support of temporal variations in helminth communities arising from seasonal and annual changes in the environment (Langley & Fairley, Reference Langley and Fairley1982; Haukisalmi et al., Reference Haukisalmi, Henttonen and Tenora1988; Montgomery & Montgomery, Reference Montgomery and Montgomery1989). Helminth species composition differs in space and time, suggesting that each site and season sampled has specific habitat characteristics that allow for the occurrence of helminth species that are better adapted to these particular conditions. In this study, differences in spatial scale are demonstrated by the occurrence of A. intermedia, S. inexpectatus and P. maldonadoi only at Rio Negro, and P. uncinata and P. lassancei only at Alegria. With regard to temporal variations, seasonal differences in helminth community structure could potentially be a consequence of changes in mammal aggregation patterns as a result of the seasonal shrinkage and expansion of their natural habitats in response to the weather conditions.

The aggregated distribution observed for most nematodes analysed is a frequent pattern of parasite distribution in the wild (Bush et al., Reference Bush, Fernandez, Esch and Seed2001; Poulin, Reference Poulin2007). The random distribution in both localities for the cestoda Raillietina sp. may result from strong intra-specific competition between the species, which has been observed with other cestoda infections (Keymer, Reference Keymer1982). Further, the existence of several intermediary and definitive hosts suggests the occurrence of the transmission cycle in different habitats (Ackert, Reference Ackert1922; Horsfall, Reference Horsfall1938).

The most common helminth species showed higher abundances, intensities and prevalences during the dry season, which may be a consequence of the regular expansion of habitat availability that is due to the shrinking bays, favouring helminth life cycles and dispersion (Lacher et al., Reference Lacher, Alho and Campos1986). The higher abundance and intensity of P. cercomysi during the wet season at Rio Negro may be due to the low host specificity of this helminth in combination with the spatial restrictions of this season, which may favour the transmission of parasites among different host species, such as Gracilinanus agilis and Clyomys laticeps. The highest prevalence observed in this study was for P. cercomysi at the Alegria farm during the dry season, where more than 80% of the animals were infected. This extremely high infection rate indicates that parasites were frequently transmitted between T. pachyurus individuals. These data suggest that the potential host species for P. cercomysi at Alegria are reduced due to anthropogenic activities.

The less common species (P. maldonadoi, S. inexpectatus, P. uncinata and P. lassancei), which were characterized as either co-dominant or unsuccessful pioneer species, were favoured by flooding and appeared only during the wet season. Given that the abundance and intensity of infection of the dominant species were generally reduced during the wet seasons, other helminth species could have became established in the host population during these periods. Considering the higher prevalence of the dominant nematode species in the study areas during the dry season (except for A. intermedia, which showed higher prevalence in the wet season) and the higher prevalence of co-dominant species during the wet season (except for P. uncinata, which was dominant at this time), we propose the hypothesis of niche constriction for the helminth community during the wet season in this study. Considering the overall host population, the lack of correlation in the helminth intensities may indicate that habitat niche reduction for helminth species allows coexistence of these parasite species.

In conclusion, land use and seasonal effects of weather conditions in the Brazilian Pantanal region may lead to modifications in the patterns of rodent parasitism due to habitat alterations and habitat reduction imposed by flooding or cattle ranching. Although land use did not seen to affect helminth diversity and did not result in a loss of helminth biodiversity, the species composition of each helminth community in T. pachyurus differed between locations, and we suggest that this difference may result from habitat differences between regions (preserved versus disturbed). Seasonality in the Pantanal was an important factor in modulating helminth parasitism. The availability of habitat, one of the most important niche dimensions in mammal communities, was equally important in helminth communities. Habitat restriction may favour parasite transmission or the occurrence of co-dominant parasites and, consequently, dissemination of helminths between low-specificity hosts, increasing the supra-population or the prevalence of parasites in T. pachyurus. The Pantanal region is located in central South America with the Amazonian Forest to the north, the Cerrado to the east, the dry Chaco to the southwest and rain forest to the southeast. Since T. pachyurus is an abundant rodent in this large plain, the Pantanal region may be acting as a corridor of dispersion between these large ecosystems for some of the helminth species that are not specific parasites of T. pachyurus.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Conservation International in Brazil for allowing us access to the Rio Negro Farm and to Sr. Herrera for access to the Alegria Farm. We are also grateful to Juberlan Silva for his valuable technical assistance. This study was supported by CNPq, IOC/FIOCRUZ, PAPES III FIOCRUZ, Conservation International, Earth Watch Institute and FUNDECT.

References

Abu-Madi, M.A., Behnke, J.M., Lewis, J.W. & Gilbert, F.S. (2000) Seasonal and site specific variation in the component community structure of intestinal helminths in Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England. Journal of Helminthology 74, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackert, J.E. (1922) The house fly and tapeworm transmission. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 30, 202–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alho, C.J.R. & Gonçalves, H.C. (2005) Biodiversidade do Pantanal – ecologia & conservação. Campo Grande, Editora UNIDERP.Google Scholar
Barnard, C.J., Behnke, J.M., Bajer, A., Bray, D., Race, T., Frake, K., Osmond, J., Dinmore, J. & Sinski, E. (2002) Local variation in endoparasite intensities of bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from ecologically similar sites: morphometric and endocrine correlates. Journal of Helminthology 76, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, J.M. (2008) Structure in parasite component communities in wild rodents: predictability, stability, associations and interactions or pure randomness? Parasitology 135, 751–766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, J.M., Lewis, J.W., Mohd Zain, S.N. & Gilbert, F.S. (1999) Helminth infections in Apodemus sylvaticus in southern England: interactive effects of host age, sex and year on the prevalence and abundance of infections. Journal of Helminthology 73, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behnke, J.M., Barnard, C.J., Bajer, A., Bray, D., Dinmore, J., Frake, K., Osmond, J., Race, T. & Sinski, E. (2001) Variation in the helminthes community structure in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from three comparable localities in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland. Parasitology 123, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonvicino, C.R., Otazu, I.B. & D'Andrea, P.S. (2002) Karyologic evidence of diversification of the genus Thrichomys (Rodentia, Echimyidae). Animal Cytogenetics and Comparative Mapping 97, 200–204.Google ScholarPubMed
Braggio, E. & Bonvicino, C.R. (2004) Molecular divergence in the genus Thrichomys (Rodentia, Echimydae). Journal of Mammalogy 85, 7–11.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A.O., Lafferty, D.K., Lotz, M.J. & Shostak, W.A. (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A.O., Fernandez, J.C., Esch, G.W. & Seed, J.R. (2001) Parasitism: the diversity and ecology of animal parasites. 1st edn.576 pp. Cambrige, Cambrige University Press.Google Scholar
Combes, C. (2001) Parasitism: the ecology and evolution of intimate interactions. 1st edn.728 pp. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cuocolo, R. (1943) ‘Pereiraia’ n.g. para o ‘Physocephalus lassancei’ Trav., 1931 (Nematoda: Spiruridae) com rediscrição da espécie tipo. Arquivos do Insituto de Biologia 14, 213–216.Google Scholar
Durette-Desset, M.C. (1985) Trichostrongyloid nematodes and their vertebrate hosts: reconstruction of the phylogeny of a parasitic group. Advances in Parasitology 24, 239–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durette-Desset, M.C. & Chabaud, A.G. (1981) Nouvel essai de classification des Nématodes Trichostrogyloidea. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee 56, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durette-Desset, M.C., Goncalves, A.Q. & Pinto, R.M. (2006) Trichostrongylina (Nematoda, Heligmosomoidea) co-parasitos em Dasyprocta fuliginosa Wagler (Rodentia, Dasyproctidae) do Brasil, com o restabelecimento do gênero Avellaria Freitas & Lent e a descrição de duas novas espécies. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23, 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feijó, I.A., Lopes Torres, E.J., Maldonado, A. Jr & Lanfredi, R.M. (2008) A new oxyurid genus and species from Gracilinanus agilis (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) in Brazil. The Journal of Parasitology 94, 847–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuentes, M.V., Sáez, S., Trelis, M., Galán-Puchades, M.T. & Esteban, J.G. (2004) The helminth community of the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus, in the Sierra Espuña, Murcia, Spain. Journal of Helminthology 78, 219–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomes, D.C., Cruz, R.P., Vicente, V. & Pinto, R.M. (2003) Nematode parasites of marsupials and small rodents from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest in state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 20, 699–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukisalmi, V. & Henttonen, H. (1990) The impact of climatic factors and host density on the long-term population dynamics of vole helminths. Oecologia 83, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haukisalmi, V., Henttonen, H. & Tenora, F. (1988) Population dynamics of common and rare helminthes in cyclic vole populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 57, 807–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, H.M., Norek, A., Freitas, T.P.T., Rademaker, V., Fernandes, O. & Jansen, A.M. (2005) Domestic and wild mammals infection by Trypanosoma evansi in a pristine area of the Brazilian Pantanal region. Parasitology Research 96, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, H.M., Rademaker, V., Abreu, U.G.P., D'Andrea, P.S. & Jansen, A.M. (2007) Variables that modulate the spatial distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma evansi in the Brazilian Pantanal. Acta Tropica 102, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera, L., D'Andrea, P.S., Xavier, S.C.C., Mangia, R.H., Fernandes, O. & Jansen, A.M. (2005) Trypanosoma cruzi infection in wild mammals of the National Park Serra da Capivara, and its surroundings (Piauí, Brazil), endemic for Chagas disease. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 99, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, M.W. (1938) Meal beetles as intermediate hosts of poultry tapeworms. Science 17, 8–11.Google Scholar
Keymer, A.E. (1982) Density-dependent mechanisms in the regulation of intestinal helminth populations. Parasitology 84, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacher, T.E. Jr, Alho, C.J.R. & Campos, Z.M.S. (1986) Densidades y preferencias de microhábitat de los mamíferos en la Hacienda Nhumirin, sub-region Nhecolândia, Pantanal de Mato Grosso del Sur. Ciência Interamericana 26, 30–38.Google Scholar
Langley, R. & Fairley, J.S. (1982) Seasonal variations in infestation of parasites in a wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus population in the west of Ireland. Journal of Zoology, London 198, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemos, E.R.S. & D'Andrea, P.S. (2006) Trabalho com animais silvestres. pp. 273–288in Martins, E.V., Martins, A.S., Silva, F.H.A.L., Lopes, M.C.M., Moreno, M.L.V. & Silva, P.C.T. (Eds) Biossegurança, informação e conceitos, textos básicos. Rio de Janeiro, FIOCRUZ.Google Scholar
Lopes Torres, E.J., Maldonado, A. Jr & Lanfredi, R.M. (2009) Spirurids from Gracilinanus agilis (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) in Brazilian Pantanal wetlands with a new species of Physaloptera (Nematoda: Spirurida). Veterinary Parasitology 63, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J.A. & Reynolds, J.F. (1988) Statistical ecology: a primer in methods and computing. 4th edn.368 pp. New York, Wiley Interscience Publications.Google Scholar
Maldonado, A. Jr, Gentile, R., Fernandes-Moraes, C.C., D'Andrea, P.S., Lanfredi, R.M. & Rey, L. (2006) Helminth communities of Nectomys squamipes naturally infected by the exotic trematodes Schistosoma mansoni in Southeastern Brazil. Journal of Helminthology 80, 369–375.Google ScholarPubMed
Magurram, A.E. (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurements. 179 pp. Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, S.S.J. & Montgomery, W.I. (1989) Spatial and temporal variation in the infracommunity structure of helminthes of Apodemus sylvaticus (Rodentia:Muridae). Parasitology 98, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, S.S.J. & Montgomery, W.I. (1990) Structure, stability and species interaction in helminth communities of Wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus. International Journal of Parasitology 20, 225–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto, R.M., Gomes, D.C., Muniz-Pereira, L.C. & Noronha, D. (2002) Helminths of the guinea pig Cavia porcellus Linneaus, in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 19, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R. (2001) Interactions between species and the structure of helminth communities. Parasitology 122, S3–S11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. (2007) Are there general laws in parasite ecology? Parasitology 134, 763–776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivero, K., Rimiz, D.I. & Taber, A.B. (2005) Differential habitat use by two sympatric brocket deer species (Mazama americana and M. gouazoubira) in a seasonal Chiquitano forest of Bolivia. Mammalia 69, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainz-Elipe, M.T., Galán-Puchades, M.T. & Fuentes, M.V. (2007) The helminth community of the Mediterranean mouse, Mus spretus, in a post-fire regenerated Mediterranean ecosystem. Helminthologia 44, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, B.R., Roque, A.L.R., Barreiros-Gomez, S.C., Borodin, P.M., Jansen, A.M. & D'Andrea, P.S. (2005) Maintenance and breeding of Thrichomys (Trouessart, 1880) (Rodentia: Echimyidae) in captivity. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 100, 627–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thul, J.E., Forrester, D.J. & Abercrombie, C.L. (1985) Ecology of parasitic helminths of wood ducks, Aix sponsa, in the Atlantic flyway. Proceedings of the Helminth Society Washington 52, 297–310.Google Scholar
Travassos, L. (1927) Nematodeos novos. Boletim de Biologia 6, 52–61.Google Scholar
Travassos, L. & Freitas, J.F.T. (1941) Relatório da terceira excursão a zona da Estrada de Ferro Noroeste do Brasil realizada em fevereiro e março de 1940. II Pesquisas helmintológicas. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 35, 610–634.Google Scholar
Travassos, L. & Freitas, J.F.T. (1948) Relatório da exursão do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz ao norte do Estado do espírito Santo, junto ao Parque Reserva e Refúgio Sooretama, em fevereiro de 1948. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 46, 605–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicente, J.J., Rodrigues, H.O., Gomes, D.C. & Pinto, R.M. (1997) Nematóides do Brasil. Parte V: Nematóides de Mamíferos. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 14, 1–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xavier, S.C.C., Vaz, V.C., D'Andrea, P.S., Herrera, L., Emperaire, L., Alves, J.R., Fernandes, O., Ferreira, L.F. & Jansen, A.M. (2007) Mapping of the distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi infection among small wild mammals in a conservation unit and its surroundings (Northeast-Brazil). Parasitology International 56, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, F. (1961) Sistema Helminthum. Vol II. The nematodes of vertebrates. 1261 pp. New York, Interscience Publisher.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis. 4th edn.960 pp. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1Number of host animals analysed in each study area and season.

Figure 1

Table 2Richness and diversity indices of helminths recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

Figure 2

Table 3Dispersion indices for each helminth recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

Figure 3

Table 4Abundance, intensity and prevalence (95% confidence limits) of each helminth species recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

Figure 4

Table 5Results of the chi-square test for abundance, intensity and prevalence in relation to farm and season for each helminth recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

Figure 5

Table 6Significant results of the stepwise logistic regression of presence/absence of each helminth recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil, considering the location and the season.

Figure 6

Table 7Spearman correlation coefficients of the intensities of infection between helminths recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil. Samples sizes (number of host animals) are in parentheses.

Figure 7

Table 8Jaccard indices of association between helminth species recovered from Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echymyidae) on the Rio Negro and Alegria Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.

Figure 8

Table 9Importance indices for the helminths on the Rio Negro (RN) and Alegria (A) Farms in the Pantanal, Brazil.