Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:34:13.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biting mechanics determines craniofacial morphology among extant diprotodont herbivores: dietary predictions for the giant extinct short-faced kangaroo, Simosthenurus occidentalis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2019

D. Rex Mitchell
Affiliation:
Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia. E-mail: drexmitch311@gmail.com, swroe@une.edu.au
Stephen Wroe
Affiliation:
Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia. E-mail: drexmitch311@gmail.com, swroe@une.edu.au

Abstract

Large herbivores can act as keystone species that strongly influence their communities. During the Pliocene and Pleistocene, Australia was dominated by a number of large to gigantic marsupial herbivore taxa. Many of these have been understudied quantitatively with regard to their ecology; and identifying the diet of these species will improve our understanding of not only their ecologies, but also of past environments. Recent research has found that cranial morphology among kangaroos and wallabies corresponds with foraging behaviors and mechanical properties of preferred plant tissues. Here we apply shape analysis and computational biomechanics to test the hypothesis: that feeding ecology is associated with craniofacial morphology across a taxonomically broad sample of diprotodont herbivores. Based on our results we predict the diet of an extinct short-faced kangaroo, Simosthenurus occidentalis. We find that biting behaviors are reflected in craniofacial morphology, but that these are more a reflection of the hardest bites required for their lifestyle, rather than diet composition alone. A combination of a very short face, robust musculoskeletal features, and dental arrangements predict that S. occidentalis was a browser, capable of consuming particularly resistant, bulky plant matter. These features were largely conserved among other short-faced kangaroos and may have offset the unpredictable availability of quality forage during the climatically variable Pleistocene epoch, contributing to their prolific diversification during this time.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Reconstructed cranium of Simosthenurus occidentalis. Scale bar, 20 mm.

Figure 1

Table 1. List of species, with number of specimens sampled and allocated diets.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of diprotodont herbivores studied here, generated using time-calibrated data (Mitchell et al. 2014). Scale = million years.

Figure 3

Table 2. Scaled muscle forces for each species of increasing body mass estimations. Values in bold, italic type represent the adjusted muscle forces to result in equivalent output forces. MD, deep masseter; MI, intermediate masseter; MS, superficial masseter; PL, lateral pterygoid; PM, medial pterygoid; T, temporalis; Z, zygomaticomandibularis.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Principal component analysis: (A) PC1 and PC2, (B) PC1 and PC3, and (C) PC1 and PC4. b, browser; g, grazer; m, mixed feeder.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Mechanical efficiency quotient (MEQ) for each species, ordered by body mass estimations.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Strain experienced for each species during equivalent incisor bites. A, Strain magnitudes along midline of the cranium. Inset depicts the location and direction of landmarks on the crania. B, Dorsal view of finite element models with von Mises (VM) microstrain (με) distributions.

Figure 7

Table 3. Relative muzzle length (muzzle/cranium) of sthenurine species, obtained from Prideaux (2004). Measurements in millimeters.