Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:54:28.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Recent Surge of Walsh Glacier, Yukon and Alaska

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

Austin Post
Austin Post*
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Tacoma, Washington, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Walsh Glacier, Yukon and Alaska, after 40 years or more of virtual stagnation in the terminal area, began a very rapid surge in late 1960 or 1961. A maximum movement of 10.1 km. occurred in the central portion of the glacier between 1961 and 1965, as shown by aerial photographs of the displacement of surface features, perhaps the greatest such displacement yet reported for any surging glacier.

Résumé

Résumé

Le Walsh Glacier, Yukon et Alaska, après 40 années ou plus de stagnation virtuelle de la zone terminale, commença une avance très rapide fin 1960 ou 1961. La partie centrale du glacier présenta un mouvement maximum de 10,1 km entre 1961 et 1965, montré par le déplacement d’accidents superficiels sur des photographies aériennes, peut-étre la plus grande avance rapportée d’un glacier en crue.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Der Walsh-Gletscher in Yukon und Alaska begann nach 40 oder mehr Jahren praktischer Stagnation des Zungengebietes im Spätjahr 1960 oder 1961 einen sehr schnellen Vorstoss. Wie aus Verlagerungen von Oberflächenerscheinungen in Luftaufnahmen hervorgeht, trat zwischen 1961 und 1965 ein Bewegungsmaximum von 10,1 km im Mittelteil des Gletschers ein, vielleicht die grösste derartige Verlagerung, die je an einem vorstossenden Gletscher festgestellt wurde.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Glaciology , Volume 6 , Issue 45 , 1966, pp. 375 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1966

General Description

Walsh Glacier, which crosses the Yukon—Alaska border at lat. 60° 55′ N. is 75 km. in length. It heads in the Icefield Ranges, Yukon Territory, Canada, in two major branches, one from the north and one from the east, each 27 m. long. Below their juncture the glacier trends in a westerly direction into Alaska and joins the Logan Glacier 16 km. above the latter’s terminus. The two glaciers merge at an elevation of 1,130 m. Logan Glacier terminates very close to Chitina Glacier and is generally mapped as joining the latter (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Map of Walsh Glacier

The accumulation area of Walsh Glacier covers about 545 km.2. The firn line is located at 2,320 m. The ablation area covers 285 km.2. The accumulation area ratio (Reference Meier and PostMeier and Post, 1962, p. 70) is 0.66. The insulating effect of heavy ablation moraine reduces the melting on 67 km.2 of glacier surface. The high accumulation area ratio and the limited amount of exposed ice in the ablation area suggest that this is a very healthy glacier.

Past Records

Very little has been written regarding Walsh Glacier. The International Boundary Commission mapped most of the glacier in about 1912. Their detailed map shows that the party crossed the Walsh where it joins the Logan and occupied two photo points overlooking the valley. Bradford Washburn photographed the lower portion of the glacier in 1938 and the U.S. Air Force took trimetrogon photos in 1948. Canadian government mapping photographs were obtained in 1951 and U.S. Geological Survey aerial photographs covering the Alaskan part of the glacier were taken in 1957. The writer has examined and photographed portions of the glacier in 1960, 1961, 1963, 1964, and 1965 in the course of aerial photographic studies of north-west North American glaciers.

Past Behavior

All photographs and maps prior to 1963 show that the lower portion of the Walsh Glacier was heavily covered with an ablation moraine and apparently stagnant.Footnote * It is quite likely that the glacier made an unrecorded surge (as defined below) sometime between the boundary commission surveys and about 1918. The 1938 photographs show surface features that indicate the lower Walsh Glacier had then been stagnant for probably 20 yr. or more. Except for further loss of ice through melting, the 1948 and 1961 photography showed that little further change had taken place. Between 1951 and 1961 no evidence of movement was found in the Walsh Glacier below the first tributary.

Recent Surge

Evidence of rapid down-valley movement of ice was apparently first noted in 1963 (Reference PostPost, 1964, p. 14). Various changes which took place in the lower part of the glacier between 1952 and 1964 have been described by Reference PaigePaige (1965).

From the photographic records the recent movement of portions of the glacier have been determined. This movement of the ice and other related features are typical of a glacier surgeFootnote * (Reference PostPost, 1960; Reference Post1965).

The Walsh Glacier surge has been exceptional in the distance the ice has moved down the valley. In a period of 4 yr. or less the maximum movement yet determined amounts to 10.1±0.1 km. To the author’s knowledge, this is greater than any such displacement previously reported for surging glaciersFootnote * (Reference Tarr and MartinTarr and Martin, 1914; Reference DesioDesio, 1954; Reference DolgushinDolgushin and others, 1963; Reference HanceHance, 1937; Reference MoffitMoffit, 1942; Reference PostPost, 1960; Reference Hattersley-SmithHattersley-Smith, 1964). The maximum average annual movements in the central part of the glacier during the 1951–60, 1951–61, 1960–63, and 1963–65 intervals are listed in Table I. Movement vectors for these time intervals are shown on Figure 1. As these figures represent averages over periods which may be considerably greater than the interval that the glacier has been in rapid motion, the actual maximum rate of flow is doubtless greater. The 1961 photography shows the central portion of the glacier from too great a distance to make accurate measurements possible. Despite this there can be little doubt that surface features in that region were essentially unchanged from 1960 (Fig. 2).

Table I.

Recent Movement of Walsh Glacier

Fig. 2.

Central section of Walsh Glacier 21 August 1960. The medial moraine loops are little changed from positions shown in photographs taken in 1938 and 1951. Note the smooth, uncrevassed ice between medial moraines. The glacier down-valley from the area shown here was covered with irregular ablation moraine and appeared to be essentially stagnant in all photographs prior to 1963.

(Photograph by Austin Post, University of Washington)

That this “advance” (surge) may have been caused by the 27 March 1964 earthquake has been suggested by Reference PaigePaige (1965, p. 877). The extensive movement which took place before August 1963 (Fig. 3) precludes this possibility. From the amount of movement recorded between 1960 and 1963 the writer believes that the surge began in the upper portion of the glacier either in late 1960 or in 1961; 1965 photography suggests that the surge has probably about completed its active cycle.

Fig. 3.

Central section of Walsh Glacier 24 August 1963. The formerly smooth ice surface is broken by innumerable crevasses. A maximum down-valley movement of 5,640 m. has taken place since 1960, as shown by the displacement of medial moraine loops. “First Tributary” enters at lower left, Logan Glacier and Mt. Logan (5,405 m.) are on right.

(Photograph by Austin Post, University of Washington)

In the upper source areas of the glacier the ice thickness had been reduced from its 1960 levels as much as 150 m. (Figs. 4 and 5), which is about the maximum amount observed in other surging glaciers. The relative absence of fresh fractures in the ice in this area in 1965 suggests that the rate of flow was much reduced.

Fig. 4.

Fast Branch, Walsh Glacier, 21 August 1960. The smooth ice and surface melt-water channels attest to the absence of crevasses. The deeply cut (white) melt-wafer channel crossing the medial moraines in the lower left side of the photo was present when the glacier was photographed in 1951.

(Photograph by Austin Post, University of Washington)

Fig. 5.

East Branch, Walsh Glacier, 23 August 1965. The glacier has been completely transformed. The margins of the glacier are intensely crevassed and the surface has been lowered 60 m. or more. Farther up the glacier lowering of the surface appears to be as much as 150 m. Note the ice affixed to valley walls which shows the level of the glacier before the surge took place. Ice flowing into Walsh Glacier from various tributaries is here clearly evident.

(Photograph by Austin Post, U.S. Geological Survey)

Other glaciers in this region have made surges in recent years and at least one appears to be in the initial stages of a surge in 1965. These glaciers are being kept under careful observation and, when possible, photographed annually.

Acknowledgement

This study was made possible by aerial photographic studies sponsored from 1960 to 1963 by the National Science Foundation and administered by the University of Washington. The U.S. Geological Survey sponsored the 1964 and 1965 studies.

Footnotes

* The term stagnant as used here describes glacier ice displaying no detectable movement on careful visual inspection of comparative aerial photographs spanning a period of five years or more. A movement of 20 m. is considered to be detectable in the photographs of Walsh Glacier.

* The term “advance” has been frequently used to describe rapid movements similar to the Walsh Glacier surge. The term is generally technically incorrect as the affected glaciers rarely advance beyond their former limits. The term “surge” is suggested to describe large-scale, short-lived glacier movements whether a terminal advance occurs or not.

* The Kutiah Glacier advance may have been greater, but its initial condition does not appear to be accurately known. [Note added in proof:] Since the manuscript of this paper was submitted, a glacier advance of 21 km. in 3 yr. has come to the author’s attention (Reference GlenGlen, 1941).

References

Desio, A. 1954. An exceptional glacier advance in the Karakoram—Ladakh region. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 2, No. 16, p. 383–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgushin, L. D., and others. 1963. Nedavneye nastupleniye Lednika Medvezh’yego , [by] L. D. Dolgushin, S. A. Yevteyev, A. N. Kranke, K. G. Rototayev [and] N. M. Svatkov. Priroda [Nature], 1963, No. 11, p. 85–92. [English translation: Canada. Defence Research Board. Report No. T 409 R, translated by E. R. Hope, 1964]Google Scholar
Glen, A. R. 1941. The latest map of North East Land. Geographical Journal, Vol. 98, No. 4, p. 206–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hance, J. H. 1937. The recent advance of Black Rapids Glacier, Alaska. Journal of Geology, Vol. 45, No. 7, p. 775–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattersley-Smith, G. 1964. Rapid advance of glacier in northern Ellesmere Island. Nature, Vol, 201, No. 4915, p. 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, M. F. Post, A. S. 1962. Recent variations in mass net budgets of glaciers in western North America. Union Géodésique et Géophysique Internationale. Association Internationale d’Hydrologie Scientifique. Commission des Neiges et Glaces. Colloque d’Obergurgl, 10–9—18–9 1962, p. 63–77.Google Scholar
Moffit, F. H. 1942. Geology of the Gerstle River district, Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey. Bulletin 926-B, p. 146–57.Google Scholar
Paige, R. A. 1965. Advance of Walsh Glacier. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 5, No. 42, p. 876–78. [Letter.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, A. S. 1960. The exceptional advances of the Muldrow, Black Rapids, and Susitna Glaciers. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 65, No. 11, p. 3703–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, A. S. 1964. Aerial photography in 1963. Ice. News Bulletin of the Glaciological Society, No. 15, p. 14–15.Google Scholar
Post, A. S. 1965. Alaskan glaciers: recent observations in respect to the earthquake advance theory. Science, Vol. 148, No. 3668, p. 366–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarr, R. S. Martin, L. 1914. Alaskan glacier studies. Washington, D.C., National Geographic Society, p. 168–97.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Map of Walsh Glacier

Figure 1

Table I.Recent Movement of Walsh Glacier

Figure 2

Fig. 2.Central section of Walsh Glacier 21 August 1960. The medial moraine loops are little changed from positions shown in photographs taken in 1938 and 1951. Note the smooth, uncrevassed ice between medial moraines. The glacier down-valley from the area shown here was covered with irregular ablation moraine and appeared to be essentially stagnant in all photographs prior to 1963.

(Photograph by Austin Post, University of Washington)
Figure 3

Fig. 3.Central section of Walsh Glacier 24 August 1963. The formerly smooth ice surface is broken by innumerable crevasses. A maximum down-valley movement of 5,640 m. has taken place since 1960, as shown by the displacement of medial moraine loops. “First Tributary” enters at lower left, Logan Glacier and Mt. Logan (5,405 m.) are on right.

(Photograph by Austin Post, University of Washington)
Figure 4

Fig. 4.Fast Branch, Walsh Glacier, 21 August 1960. The smooth ice and surface melt-water channels attest to the absence of crevasses. The deeply cut (white) melt-wafer channel crossing the medial moraines in the lower left side of the photo was present when the glacier was photographed in 1951.

(Photograph by Austin Post, University of Washington)
Figure 5

Fig. 5.East Branch, Walsh Glacier, 23 August 1965. The glacier has been completely transformed. The margins of the glacier are intensely crevassed and the surface has been lowered 60 m. or more. Farther up the glacier lowering of the surface appears to be as much as 150 m. Note the ice affixed to valley walls which shows the level of the glacier before the surge took place. Ice flowing into Walsh Glacier from various tributaries is here clearly evident.

(Photograph by Austin Post, U.S. Geological Survey)