Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T00:57:26.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study on pitting initiation mechanism of super-austenitic stainless steel weld in chloride environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2016

Sung Jin Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 540-742, Republic of Korea
Seung Gab Hong
Affiliation:
POSCO Steel Solution Marketing Division, Pohang 790-704, Korea
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: sjkim56@sunchon.ac.kr

Abstract

There has been controversy over the localized corrosion mechanism of super-austenitic stainless steel weld due mainly to the lack of effective evaluation technique for identification of corrosion nucleation site in weld. For this reason, an electrochemical polarization method followed by an observation of microstructure using the back-scattered electron mode in field emission-scanning electron microscopy is used. To clarify the localized corrosion mechanism, energy dispersive spectroscopy line profile analyzed by transmission electron microscopy is additionally utilized. It clearly reveals that the selective corrosion is preferentially initiated around the σ-phase precipitated in the interdendritic region in weld. The local depletion of Cr and Mo around the σ-phase can be partly replenished by the diffusion of the elements into the depleted area during the subsequent heat treatment at 1180 °C.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Cross-sectional macro view of WM, and (b) surface morphology of center region in weld, observed by optical microscope.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Comparison of polarization curves obtained by conventional method and newly devised method.16

Figure 2

FIG. 3. (a) and (b) Optical microscope showing surface morphology of specimens obtained by conventional method and newly devised method, respectively.16

Figure 3

FIG. 4. FE-SEM photographs exhibiting surface morphology of specimen (a) before and (b) after the corrosion evaluation by newly devised method, and (c) magnified view of (b) and its EDS analysis.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Cross-sectional observation of 2nd phase particle utilizing FIB technique.16

Figure 5

FIG. 6. TEM observation of 2nd phase particle, and line profile of Cr and Mo around the particle.16

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Comparison of potentiodynamic polarization curves of heat treated and nonheat treated specimens.16

Figure 7

TABLE I. Several corrosion parameters of heat treated and nonheat treated specimen, obtained after potentiodynamic polarization test in 1 M NaCl + 0.5 M HCl solution at 70 °C (Icrit: critical current density, Ipassive: minimum passive current density, Epit: critical potential at which passive current starts to increase).

Figure 8

FIG. 8. CPT test for heat treated and nonheat treated specimens.

Figure 9

FIG. 9. Comparison of line profile of Cr and Mo for heat treated and nonheat treated specimen.

Figure 10

FIG. 10. Comparison of σ-phase and surface morphology after potentiodynamic polarization measurement for nonheat treated and heat treated specimen, respectively.