Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:06:02.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory Intercomparison of Pleistocene Bone Radiocarbon Dating Protocols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

Matthias Huels*
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research, Max-Eyth-Str.11-13, 24118 Kiel, Germany
Johannes van der Plicht
Affiliation:
Center for Isotope Research, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
Fiona Brock
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford, United Kingdom Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, SN6 8LA, United Kingdom
Simon Matzerath
Affiliation:
LVR-LandesMuseum Bonn, Germany University of Tübingen, Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelalters, Germany
David Chivall
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author. Email: mhuels@leibniz.uni-kiel.de.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since its invention in the late 1940s, radiocarbon (14C) dating has become an important tool for absolute dating. A prerequisite for the acceptance of this method is consistency between, and compatibility of, 14C dates from different laboratories. To meet these requirements, international laboratory intercomparison studies with different sample materials are frequently performed (e.g. TIRI, FIRI, VIRI and, most recently, SIRI).Intercomparison is especially relevant and difficult for samples close to the dating limit of ~50 kBP, not least for bone samples. A 14C intercomparison study between the Leibniz-Laboratory in Kiel (Germany), the Center for Isotope Research (CIO) in Groningen (the Netherlands), and the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU, United Kingdom) was performed on three Pleistocene (MIS3) mammal bone samples from the Brick Quarry site Coenen (BQC) in Germany. The comparison of individually prepared and measured bone collagen 14C activities, results from shared collagen measurements, and respective background signatures and correction points to the latter as the main factor responsible for observed differences in final given radiocarbon estimates.

Information

Type
Method Development
Copyright
© 2017 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Locality (black triangle) of the Brick Quarry site Coenen, Körrenzig, Germany, and Loess distribution along the left lower Rhine Valley (Lehmkuhl et al. 2016)

Figure 1

Table 1 Sample preparation: collagen extraction procedure, CO2 conversion, graphitization, AMS system, and applied measurement corrections.

Figure 2

Table 2 Radiocarbon concentrations (F14Ccorrected, background 14C, and F14Cfinal), δ13C (AMS and IRMS), and conventional 14C ages of samples BQC-101, -55, and -78.

Figure 3

Figure 2 Measured 14C concentrations of BQC-101, BQC-55, and BQC-78. Patterned columns represent Kiel, Groningen, and Oxford (from left to right) extracted collagen F14Cfinal values. The magnitude of applied background correction is shown in gray columns.