Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:43:02.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phylogenetic position of Ancyrocephalus (sensu lato) curtus Achmerov, 1952 (Monopisthocotylea, Dactylogyridae), a parasite of fish Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877(Gobiiformes: Odontobutidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2024

Sergey G. Sokolov Open the ORCID record for Sergey G. Sokolov [Opens in a new window] ,
Fuat K. Khasanov Open the ORCID record for Fuat K. Khasanov [Opens in a new window]  and
Sergei A. Vlasenkov Open the ORCID record for Sergei A. Vlasenkov [Opens in a new window]
Sergey G. Sokolov
Affiliation:
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, RAS, Leninsky Prospect 33, Moscow, 119071 Russia
Fuat K. Khasanov
Affiliation:
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, RAS, Leninsky Prospect 33, Moscow, 119071 Russia
Sergei A. Vlasenkov*
Affiliation:
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, RAS, Leninsky Prospect 33, Moscow, 119071 Russia
*
Corresponding author: Sergei A. Vlasenkov; Email: svlasenkov22@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genus Ancyrocephalus sensu lato is a large assemblage of species of dactylogyrid monopisthocotyleans without clear taxonomic boundaries. Despite an urgent need for revision, only three representatives of this taxon have been molecularly characterised so far. We found specimens of Ancyrocephalus curtus, a previously non-genotyped species, in gills of Perccottus glenii caught in the River Syumnyur, Amur Basin, Russia. The aim of this study was to assess the phylogenetic position of this parasite using partial sequences of 28S rRNA gene. In the phylogenetic tree, A. curtus appeared as a sister taxon to the dactylogyrine genus Gobioecetes. The new molecular evidence supports the hypothesis about the non-monophyletic status of Ancyrocephalus sensu lato.

Keywords

28S rDNAAmur basinmonogeneanpolyphyly

Information

Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 98 , 2024 , e37
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Ancyrocephalus Creplin, 1839, a large assemblage of dactylogyrid monopisthocotyleans, is a taxonomically problematic genus (Bychowsky and Nagibina Reference Bychowsky and Nagibina1970; Kritsky and Nitta, Reference Kritsky and Nitta2019; Kmentová et al. Reference Kmentová, Cruz-Laufer, Pariselle, Smeets, Artois and Vanhove2022). The number of species attributed to it has diminished after numerous revisions (e.g., Bychowsky and Nagibina Reference Bychowsky and Nagibina1970; Beverley-Burton Reference Beverley-Burton, Margolis and Kabata1984; Dossou and Euzet Reference Dossou and Euzet1984; Agarwal et al. Reference Agarwal, Yadav and Kritsky2001; Kritsky et al. Reference Kritsky, Pandey, Agrawal and Abdullah2004; Dmitrieva et al. Reference Dmitrieva, Gerasev, Gibson, Pronkina and Galli2012; Kmentová et al. Reference Kmentová, van Steenberge, Raeymaekers, Koblmüller, Hablützel, Bukinga, N’sibula, Mulungula, Nzigidahera, Ntakimazi, Gelnar and Vanhove2018; Kritsky and Nitta Reference Kritsky and Nitta2019). Nevertheless, the concept of Ancyrocephalus sensu lato is still applicable to 39 nominal dactylogyrid species with four anchors connected with dorsal and ventral bars and seven pairs of similar or different hooks (WoRMS 2024).

Molecular data are available only on three species of Ancyrocephalus sensu lato: Ancyrocephalus paradoxus Creplin, 1839, Ancyrocephalus percae Ergens, 1966, and Ancyrocephalus mogurndae (Yamaguti, 1940). Phylogenetic analyses based on these data have shown that Ancyrocephalus sensu stricto, as proposed by Bychowsky and Nagibina (Reference Bychowsky and Nagibina1970) for A. paradoxus (type) and A. percae from freshwater Palaearctic percid fishes, appears to be a natural taxon (Mathews et al. Reference Mathews, Domingues, Maia, Silva, Adriano and Aguiar2021; Kmentová et al. Reference Kmentová, Cruz-Laufer, Pariselle, Smeets, Artois and Vanhove2022; Osaki-Pereira et al. Reference Osaki-Pereira, Narciso, Vieira, Müller, Ebert and da Silva2023). At the same time, A. mogurndae clusters with representatives of Eutrianchoratus Paperna, 1969, Gobioecetes Ogawa & Ito, Reference Ogawa and Itoh2017 , Heteronchocleidus Bychowsky, 1957, Pseudodactylogyrus Gussev, 1965, and Trianchoratus Price & Berry, 1966, confirming the polyphyly of Ancyrocephalus sensu lato (Wu et al. Reference Wu, Zhu, Xie and Li2006; Mendoza-Palmero et al. Reference Mendoza-Palmero, Blasco-Costa and Scholz2015; Kmentová et al. Reference Kmentová, Cruz-Laufer, Pariselle, Smeets, Artois and Vanhove2022). According to Kmentová et al. (Reference Kmentová, Cruz-Laufer, Pariselle, Smeets, Artois and Vanhove2022), A. mogurndae diverged from A. paradoxus and A. percae at the subfamily level: Dactylogyrinae vs Ancyrocephalinae.

Ancyrocephalus curtus Achmerov, 1952 is a host-specific gill-associated parasite of the odontobutid fish Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877. This fish is an invasive species with a rather small heartland (the Middle and the Lower Amur and several neighbouring water systems) and an extensive invader range (water bodies of Europe and Siberia) (Reshetnikov Reference Reshetnikov2010). Ancyrocephalus curtus has been recorded only in native populations of P. glenii and in some introduced populations confined to water bodies within the Upper Amur Basin (Sokolov and Frolov Reference Sokolov and Frolov2012; Sokolov et al. Reference Sokolov2013, Reference Sokolov, Reshetnikov and Protasova2014; Sokolov and Reshetnikov Reference Sokolov and Reshetnikov2020). The type locality of this parasite is Lake Bolon, Amur Basin (Akhmerov Reference Akhmerov1952). Here we provide the first phylogenetic assessment of A. curtus using partial sequences of 28S rRNA gene.

Material and methods

In July 2023, specimens of A. curtus (Figure 1) were collected from the gills of P. glenii caught in the River Syumnyur, a tributary of Lake Bolon, Amur Basin (49°52’56’’ N; 136°7’52’’ E). The parasites were fixed in 96% ethanol and stored at −18ºC. The parasite species was identified according to Akhmerov (Reference Akhmerov1952), Gussev (Reference Gussev1955), and Gussev et al. (Reference Gussev, Gerasev, Pugachev, Galli, Pugachev and Kritsky2009).

Figure 1.

Ancyrocephalus curtus from Perccottus glenii. A – haptoral hard parts. B – male copulatory organ. d – dorsal anchors and dorsal haptoral bar; pn – penis; pt –accessory piece; v – ventral anchors and ventral haptoral bar. Scale bar; A, B = 20 μm.

Total DNA was extracted separately from small body fragments (anterior ends cut off at the level of eyespots) of two specimens according to Holterman et al. (Reference Holterman, van der Wurff, van den Elsen, van Megen, Bongers, Holovachov, Bakker and Helder2006). The remaining body parts of these specimens were treated with proteinase-K to soften the tissue and were mounted in glycerol-gelatine to study sclerotised structures. The extracted DNA was used as a template in the PCR reaction to amplify the partial D1–D2 domain of the 28S rRNA gene using forward C1 (5’-ACCCGCTGAATTTAAGCAT-3’) (Gouÿ de Bellocq et al. Reference Gouÿde Bellocq, Ferté, Depaquit, Justine, Tillier and Durette-Desset2001 ) and reverse primers D2 (5’- TGGTCCGTGTTTCAAGAC-3’) (Lê et al. Reference Lê, Lecointre and Perasso1993). Cycling conditions were as follows: 2 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were examined on 1% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed upon transillumination.

To assess the phylogenetic relationships of A. curtus, Bayesian Inference analyses based on partial sequences of 28S rRNA gene were performed. BLAST searches performed on newly obtained sequences demonstrated the highest matching with the sequences of members of the Dactylogyrinae sensu Kmentová et al. (Reference Kmentová, Cruz-Laufer, Pariselle, Smeets, Artois and Vanhove2022). For the phylogenetic reconstructions, newly obtained sequences were aligned with sequences of dactylogyrinines and some ancyrocephalines (only A. percae and A. paradoxus) available in the GenBank dataset. Alignments were performed using the Muscle algorithm (Edgar Reference Edgar2004) as implemented in SeaView Version 4.0 (Gouy et al. Reference Gouy, Guindon and Gascuel2010), after which the alignment was adjusted manually. The final length of the alignment was 606 bp. Bayesian algorithm was performed in MrBayes 3.2.7a (Ronquist et al. Reference Ronquist, Teslenko, van der Mark, Ayres, Darling, Höhna, Larget, Liu, Suchard and Huelsenbeck2012) with the GTR+G+I model. The evolutionary model was estimated with the help of jModeltest 2.1.7 (Darriba et al. Reference Darriba, Taboada, Doallo and Posada2012). In the analysis, 15,000,000 generations of the Markov chain Monte Carlo were simulated, and the selection was performed once every 100 generations. Three species of the Diplectanidae (i.e., Dolicirroplectanum lacustre Kmentová, Gelnar & Vanhove, 2021, Paradiplectanum sillagonum (Tripathi, 1959), and Pseudorhabdosynochus grouperi (Bu, Leong, Wong, Woo & Foo, 1999)) were used as outgroup (Kmentová et al. Reference Kmentová, Cruz-Laufer, Pariselle, Smeets, Artois and Vanhove2022).

Results

The two newly obtained sequences of 28S rRNA gene of A. curtus were identical. Bayesian Inference analysis showed that A. curtus was a strongly supported sister taxon to Gobioecetes (Figure 2). In turn, the A. curtus + Gobioecetes clade appeared as a strongly supported sister taxon to A. mogurndae, and this entire species group was nested in the highly supported clade, which also contained Eutrianchoratus cleithrium Lim, Reference Lim1989 , Heteronchocleidus buschkieli Bychowsky, 1957, Pseudodactylogyrus spp., and Trianchoratus gussevi Lim, Reference Lim1986. The above-mentioned representatives of Eutrianchoratus, Heteronchocleidus, and Trianchoratus formed a clade that had a strongly supported sister relationship to the A. mogurndae + (A. curtus + Gobioecetes) clade. Pseudodactylogyrus spp. occupied a basal position to all the species mentioned above.

Figure 2.

Phylogenetic relationships of Ancyrocephalus curtus reconstructed by Bayesian Inference analysis of 28S rRNA gene sequences. Posterior probability values lower than 0.9 are not shown. Newly obtained sequences are underlined.

The clade containing A. mogurndae, A. curtus, Gobioecetes spp., Pseudodactylogyrus spp., and representatives of Eutrianchoratus, Heteronchocleidus, and Trianchoratus was resolved within the large, strongly supported Dactylogyrinae clade.

Discussion

In this study, we assessed the phylogenetic position of A. curtus from the type-host and the locality very close to the type-locality using molecular data. Our phylogenetic analysis shows that A. curtus shares the most recent common ancestor with the clade formed by Gobioecetes spp. from Japanese freshwater gobiid fish. The similarities between A. curtus and Gobioecetes spp. are evident in the morphology of the sclerotised male copulatory organ and the absence of the vaginal armament. These parasite species have a penis shaped as a long, coiled and/or sinuous tube with a conspicuous inflation at the base, and an accessory piece shaped as a separate, distinctly concaved plate, which is not connected to the proximal end of the penis (Gussev Reference Gussev1955; Ogawa and Itoh Reference Ogawa and Itoh2017; Nitta and Nagasawa Reference Nitta and Nagasawa2020). The most pronounced differences between A. curtus and Gobioecetes spp. are associated with the haptoral armatures. The former species has both the dorsal and the ventral haptoral bar, whereas Gobioecetes spp. have only the ventral bar (Gussev Reference Gussev1955; Ogawa and Itoh Reference Ogawa and Itoh2017; Nitta and Nagasawa Reference Nitta and Nagasawa2020).

Our findings suggest that there is no direct phylogenetic relationship between A. curtus and A. mogurndae. However, this conclusion is provisional because the identification of A. mogurndae specimens for which molecular data are available is not supported by any morphological evidence. Ancyrocephalus mogurndae is characterised by the same morphological type of the male copulatory organ as A. curtus and Gobioecetes spp. (Gussev Reference Gussev1955; Ogawa and Itoh Reference Ogawa and Itoh2017; Nitta and Nagasawa Reference Nitta and Nagasawa2020). At the same time, this species differs sharply from A. curtus and Gobioecetes spp. in the presence of the vaginal armament (Gussev Reference Gussev1955; Ogawa and Itoh Reference Ogawa and Itoh2017; Nitta and Nagasawa Reference Nitta and Nagasawa2020). Based on morphological and ecological data, Gerasev (Reference Gerasev2008) hypothesised that the group within Ancyrocephalus sensu lato containing A. curtus and A. mogurndae might have a monophyletic status. However, our results do not support this hypothesis.

The clade of A. mogurndae, A. curtus, and Gobioecetes spp. appeared as a member of a monophyletic group within the Dactylogyrinae, which also comprised Pseudodactylogyrus spp. and representatives of Eutrianchoratus, Heteronchocleidus, and Trianchoratus. Kmentová et al. (Reference Kmentová, Cruz-Laufer, Pariselle, Smeets, Artois and Vanhove2022) proposed to name this group Clade A9. Morphological synapomorphies for Clade A9 are not obvious. The only clearly distinctive feature of its members is that their range (or its native part, in case of invasive Pseudodactylogyrus spp.) lies within the Far Eastern and/or South-Eastern regions of Asia (Gussev Reference Gussev1955; Lim Reference Lim1986, Reference Lim1989; Buchmann et al. Reference Buchmann, Mellergaard and Køie1987).

The position of A. mogurndae and A. curtus on our tree combined with morphological differences between them and Gobioecetes spp. probably indicates that each of these representatives of Ancyrocephalus sensu lato should be assigned to a separate genus. However, we refrain from this taxonomic act until molecular data on other Ancyrocephalus spp. from the fishes of the Amur Basin described by Akhmerov (Reference Akhmerov1952) and Gussev (Reference Gussev1955) become available.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Dr. E. Frolov and the staff of the United Directorate of State Natural Reserves and National Parks ‘Zapovednoe Priamurye’, and personally, Dr. R. Andronova and Mr. E. Mishakov for their assistance in organising field work.

Financial support

The work was partly funded by the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education FFER-2021-0005.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethical standard

Not applicable. The host fish is an object of recreational fishing, and therefore, no ethics permit was required under the Russian law.

References

Agarwal, N, Yadav, VS, and Kritsky, DC (2001) On Ancyrocephalus etropli Gussev, 1963, from Etroplus suratensis (Perciformes: Cichlidae) in India, with proposal of Sclerocleidoides gen. n. (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae). Comparative Parasitology 68, 87–90.Google Scholar
Akhmerov, AK (1952) New species of fish monogeneans of the Amur River. Parasitologichesky Sbornik ZIN AN SSSR 14, 181–212 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Beverley-Burton, M (1984) Monogenea and Turbellaria. pp. 5–209 in Margolis, L and Kabata, Z (Eds), Guide to the parasites of fishes of Canada, Part 1. Ottawa: Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 74.Google Scholar
Buchmann, K, Mellergaard, S, and Køie, M (1987) Pseudodactylogyrus infections in eels: a review. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 3, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bychowsky, BE and Nagibina, LF (1970) Contributions to the revision of the genus Ancyrocephalus Creplin, 1839 (Dactylogyridae, Ancyrocephalinae). Parazitologiya 4, 193–200 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Darriba, D, Taboada, GL, Doallo, R, and Posada, D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9, 772. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7519(98)00127-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dmitrieva, EV, Gerasev, PI, Gibson, DI, Pronkina, NV, and Galli, P (2012) Descriptions of eight new species of Ligophorus Euzet & Suriano, 1977 (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from Red Sea mullets. Systematic Parasitology 81, 203–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-011-9341-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dossou, C and Euzet, L (1984) Parasites de Poissons d’eau douce du Bénin II. Espèces nouvelles du genre Bouixella (Monogenea), parasites de Mormyridae. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Section A, Zoologie, biologie et écologie animales 6, 41–47 (in French).Google Scholar
Edgar, RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5), 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holterman, M, van der Wurff, A, van den Elsen, S, van Megen, H, Bongers, T, Holovachov, O, Bakker, J, and Helder, J (2006) Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown Clades. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, 1792–1800. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerasev, PI (2008) Fauna of monogeneans (Monogenea, Platyhelminthes) of gudgeons (Gobioninae, Cyprinidae). 1. Composition, structure, and characteristics of distribution. Parazitologiya 42, 405–427 (in Russian).Google ScholarPubMed
Gouy, M, Guindon, S, and Gascuel, O (2010) SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27(2), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouÿde Bellocq, J, Ferté, H, Depaquit, J, Justine, J-L, Tillier, A, and Durette-Desset, M-C (2001). Phylogeny of the Trichostrongylina (Nematoda) inferred from 28S rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19, 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.0925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussev, AV, Gerasev, PI, and Pugachev, ON (2009) Order Dactylogyridea. pp. 15–337 in Galli, P, Pugachev, ON, and Kritsky, DC (Eds.), Guide to Monogenoidea of freshwater fish of Palaearctic and Amur regions. Milano: LediPublishing.Google Scholar
Gussev, AV (1955) Monogenetic trematodes of fishes of the Amur basin. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta AN SSSR 19, 171–398 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kmentová, N, Cruz-Laufer, AJ, Pariselle, A, Smeets, K, Artois, T, and Vanhove, MPM (2022) Dactylogyridae 2022: a meta-analysis of phylogenetic studies and generic diagnoses of parasitic flatworms using published genetic and morphological data. International Journal for Parasitology 52, 427–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2022.01.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kmentová, N, van Steenberge, M, Raeymaekers, JA, Koblmüller, S, Hablützel, PI, Bukinga, FM, N’sibula, TM, Mulungula, PM, Nzigidahera, B, Ntakimazi, G, Gelnar, M, and Vanhove, MP (2018) Monogenean parasites of sardines in Lake Tanganyika: diversity, origin and intraspecific variability. Contributions to Zoology 87, 105–132. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-08702004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritsky, DC and Nitta, M (2019) Dactylogyrids (Platyhelminthes: Monogenoidea) infecting the gill lamellae of flatheads (Scorpaeniformes: Platycephalidae), with proposal of Platycephalotrema n. gen. and descriptions of new species from Australia and Japan. Diversity 11, 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11080132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritsky, DC, Pandey, K, Agrawal, N, and Abdullah, SM (2004) Monogenoids from the gills of spiny eels (Teleostei: Mastacembelidae) in India and Iraq, proposal of Mastacembelocleidus gen. n., and status of the Indian species of Actinocleidus, Urocleidus and Haplocleidus (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae). Folia Parasitologica 51, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2004.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lê, HL, Lecointre, G, and Perasso, R (1993) A 28S rRNA-based phylogeny of the gnathostomes: first steps in the analysis of conflict and congruence with morphologically based cladograms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2, 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1993.1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, LH (1986) New species of Trianchoratus Price et Berry, 1966 (Ancyrocephalidae) from Malayan anabantoid fishes. Parasitologica Hungarica 19, 31–42.Google Scholar
Lim, LH (1989) Eutrianchoratus species (Heteronchocleidinae, Monogenea) from a Malaysian freshwater fish, Belontia hasselti (Anabantoidei). Helminthologia 26, 249–258.Google Scholar
Mathews, PD, Domingues, MV, Maia, AAM, Silva, MRM, Adriano, EA, and Aguiar, JC (2021) Morphological and molecular characterization of Ameloblastella pirarara sp. n. (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae) parasitizing the large Amazonian catfish Phractocephalus hemioliopterus. Microbial Pathogenesis 158, 105077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Palmero, CA, Blasco-Costa, I, and Scholz, T (2015) Molecular phylogeny of Neotropical monogeneans (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea) from catfishes (Siluriformes). Parasites & Vectors 8, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0767-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nitta, M and Nagasawa, K (2020) Gobioecetes longibasais n. sp. (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) from Rhinogobius similis Gill (Perciformes: Gobiidae) from Okinawa-jima Island, the Ryukyu Archipelago, southern Japan, with a new host record for Gobioecetes biwaensis Ogawa & Itoh, 2017. Systematic Parasitology 97, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-020-09905-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, K and Itoh, N (2017) Gobioecetes biwaensis n. g., n. sp. (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) from the gills of a freshwater gobiid fish, Rhinogobius sp. BW Takahashi & Okazaki, 2002, with a redescription of Parancyrocephaloides daicoci Yamaguti, 1938. Parasitology International 66, 287–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2017.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osaki-Pereira, MM, Narciso, RB, Vieira, DHMD, Müller, MI, Ebert, MB, and da Silva, RJ (2023) Molecular phylogeny of two Rhinoxenus species (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) from the nasal cavities of serrasalmids (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) from Brazil. Systematic Parasitology 100, 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-023-10102-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reshetnikov, AN (2010) The current range of Amur sleeper Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877 (Odontobutidae, Pisces) in Eurasia. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 1, 119–26. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2075111710020116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronquist, F, Teslenko, M, van der Mark, P, Ayres, DL, Darling, A, Höhna, S, Larget, B, Liu, L, Suchard, MA, and Huelsenbeck, JP (2012) MRBAYES 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model selection across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61, 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, SG and Frolov, EV (2012) Diversity of parasites in the Amur sleeper (Perccottus glenii, Osteichthyes, Odontobutidae) within its native range. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 91, 17–29 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Sokolov, SG, Reshetnikov, AN, and Protasova, EN (2014) A checklist of parasites in non-native populations of Rotan Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877 (Odontobutidae). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 30, 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, SG and Reshetnikov, AN (2020) A checklist of parasites of non-native populations of the fish Rotan Perccottus glenii (Odontobutidae): Communication II. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 36, 568–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.14075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, SG (2013) New data on parasite fauna of the Chinese sleeper Perccottus glenii (Actinopterygii: Odontobutidae) in Primorsky Territory with the description of a new myxozoan species from the genus Myxidium (Myxozoa: Myxidiidae). Parazitologiya 47, 77–99 (in Russian).Google ScholarPubMed
WoRMS (2024) Ancyrocephalus Creplin, 1839. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=119279 (accessed January 24, 2024).Google Scholar
Wu, XY, Zhu, XQ, Xie, MQ, and Li, AX (2006) The radiation of Haliotrema (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae): molecular evidence and explanation inferred from LSU rDNA sequences. Parasitology 132, 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118200500956X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Ancyrocephalus curtus from Perccottus glenii.A – haptoral hard parts. B – male copulatory organ. d – dorsal anchors and dorsal haptoral bar; pn – penis; pt –accessory piece; v – ventral anchors and ventral haptoral bar. Scale bar; A, B = 20 μm.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships of Ancyrocephalus curtus reconstructed by Bayesian Inference analysis of 28S rRNA gene sequences. Posterior probability values lower than 0.9 are not shown. Newly obtained sequences are underlined.