Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:47:10.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of laser fabricated nanostructured Cu/diamond-like carbon composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2011

Y.M. Foong
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117574, Singapore
A.T.T. Koh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117574, Singapore
S.R. Lim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117574, Singapore
D.H.C. Chua*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117574, Singapore
H.Y. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: msechcd@nus.edu.sg

Abstract

Copper/diamond-like carbon (DLC) was fabricated using pulsed laser deposition, and the effects of copper on the properties of DLC composites were studied. Experimental results showed that the presence of copper promoted surface evolution through the formation of nanoclusters, accentuated the formation of Si–C but graphitized the diamond bondings of DLC matrix. By considering the interaction of laser with copper/carbon composite target, the presence of copper may have increased the energy absorbed during laser deposition, as envisaged by Saha’s equation. Thus, upon the impingement of ions on substrate during deposition, the carbon and silicon atoms may have been redistributed to form Si–C bonding while the excess energy was released as heat to promote the formation of nanoclusters but graphitize the sp3 bonding in DLC. Although sp3 bonding was reduced with the presence of copper, mechanical characterization showed that the adhesion strength of the composite films was approximately five times higher compared to undoped DLC, as a result of the decrease in internal stress and the formation of Si–C bondings in DLC.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Wide range scanning of Raman spectra on Si, undoped diamond-like carbon (DLC), and Cu/DLC nanocomposite films. (b) Narrow range scanning of Raman spectra on Si, undoped DLC, and Cu/DLC nanocomposite films. (c) Deconvoluted Raman spectra on undoped DLC (below), Cu 5 at.%/DLC (middle), and Cu 15 at.%/DLC (top).

Figure 1

TABLE I. D and G peaks positions, amplitude, full-width half-maximum (FWHM), ID/IG ratio, and estimated sp3 percent for diamond-like carbon (DLC) doped with different at.% of copper.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. (a) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra for undoped DLC and Cu/DLC films at Cu 2p before light sputtering. (b) XPS spectra for Cu 5 at.%/DLC film at Cu 2p before light sputtering and after light sputtering.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. (a) Deconvolution on XPS C 1s spectra on undoped DLC. (b) Deconvolution on XPS C 1s spectra on Cu 5 at.%/DLC. (c) Deconvolution on XPS C 1s spectra on Cu 15 at.%/DLC.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Estimation of sp3 content using Raman spectroscopy and XPS.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. ID/IG ratio (circle), sp3 content estimated by XPS (square), percentage of Si–C estimated by XPS (triangular), and critical load (inverted triangular) for DLC doped with different fraction of copper.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. (a) SIMS depth profiling on undoped DLC. (b) SIMS depth profiling on Cu 5 at.%/DLC.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. (a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) scanning on Cu 5 at.%/DLC. (b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) scanning on Cu 15 at.%/DLC.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. Electrical sheet resistivity of DLC doped with different copper content.

Figure 9

FIG. 9. Atomic force microscopy scanning (scan size: 1 μm ×1 μm, Z–data scale: 10 nm) on DLC doped with different fraction of copper; (a) Undoped DLC (b) Cu 5 at.%/DLC (c) Cu 10 at.%/DLC and (d) Cu 15 at.%/DLC.

Figure 10

TABLE II. Surface roughness for DLC films doped with different at.% of copper.

Figure 11

FIG. 10. Tangential load versus progressive normal load for undoped DLC (triangular) and Cu 15 at.%/DLC (circle). The COF of the material can be estimated from the slope of the curve.

Figure 12

TABLE III. Coefficient of friction (COF) for DLC doped with different at.% of copper.