Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:16:31.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow transitions and effective properties in multiphase Taylor–Couette flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2024

Arthur B. Young
Affiliation:
Harvard Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02134, USA Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Abhishek Shetty
Affiliation:
Rheology Division, Advanced Technical Center, Anton Paar USA, Ashland, VA 23005, USA
Melany L. Hunt*
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: hunt@caltech.edu

Abstract

The properties of multiphase flows are challenging to measure, and yet effective properties are fundamental to modelling and predicting flow behaviour. The current study is motivated by rheometric measurements of a gas-fluidized bed using a coaxial rheometer in which the fluidization rate and the rotational speed can be varied independently. The measured torque displays a range of rheological states: quasistatic, dense granular flow behaviour at low fluidization rates and low-to-moderate shear rates; turbulent toroidal-vortex flow at high shear rates and moderate-to-high fluidization rates; and viscous-like behaviour with rate-dependent torque at high shear rates and low fluidization or at low shear rates and high fluidization. To understand the solid-like to fluid-like transitions, additional experiments were performed in the same rheometer using single-phase liquid and liquid–solid suspensions. The fluidized bed experiments are modelled as a Bingham plastic for low fluidization rates, and as a shear-thinning Carreau liquid at high fluidization rates. The suspensions are modelled using the Krieger–Dougherty effective viscosity. The results demonstrate that, by using the effective properties, the inverse Bingham number marks the transition from solid-like to viscous-flow behaviour; a modified gap Reynolds number based on the thickness of the shear layer specifies the transition from solid-like to turbulent vortical flow; and a gap Reynolds number distinguishes viscous behaviour from turbulent vortical flow. The results further demonstrate that these different multiphase flows undergo analogous flow transitions at similar Bingham or Reynolds numbers and the corresponding dimensionless torques show comparable scaling in response to annular shear.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Critical shear Reynolds numbers ($Re_{s,c}$) and gap Reynolds numbers ($Re_{b,c}$) from investigations into Taylor–Couette flow for systems with a rotating inner cylinder and stationary outer cylinder. The aspect ratio, $\zeta = L/(r_o-r_i)$, and the radius ratio, $\eta = r_i/r_o$, shift the critical Reynolds numbers in Taylor–Couette flow (Chandrasekhar 1960; Donnelly & Fultz 1960; Deng et al.2010). The axial boundary conditions (BC) are known to have distinct effects on the development of Ekman vortices in short annular columns (Czarny et al.2003) as indicated in the table using free surface (FS) and stationary surface (SS). Also included are the results of experiments on neutrally buoyant particles by Ramesh et al. (2019) and this study.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic of the Anton Paar MCR-302 rheometer with two different concentric cylinder experimental configurations. The powder cell configuration is equipped with a ‘smooth cylinder’ ($sc$) measuring tool and a ‘profile cylinder’ (‘pc’, or ‘rough’) measuring tool.

Figure 2

Table 2. Properties of liquids and solids for the gas-fluidized beds (FB), pure liquids (PL) inner cylinders of differing surface roughness (SR), neutrally buoyant particles (NB), negatively buoyant particles (UB) and positively buoyant particles (XB). The table lists the volumetric solid fraction ($\phi$), the particle diameter ($D$), the fluid density ($\rho _f$), the solid-particle density ($\rho _s$), the bulk density ($\rho _b$), the fluid dynamic viscosity ($\mu _f$) and the KD effective viscosity ($\mu _{eff}$) for each experiment using $\phi _m=0.61$.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Measured torque against rotational speed for Newtonian liquids (PL, a), neutrally buoyant particle suspensions (NB, b), negatively buoyant particle suspensions (UB, c) and positively buoyant particle suspensions (XB, d).

Figure 4

Figure 3. Measurements of the solid fraction $\phi$ as a function of normalized fluidization rate $q$ and rotational speed $\omega _i$ for FB1 with mean diameter $D = 113\ \mathrm {\mu }$m. At $\omega _i = 0$, intermittent bubbling can be seen within the bed volume starting at $q=1.1$. Beyond this flow rate, the estimated volumetric solid fraction, $\phi$, decreases with respect to $q$, as found for $\omega _i= 0.01$, 10 and 100 rad s$^{-1}$ in (b), (c) and (d).

Figure 5

Figure 4. Measured torque as a function of angular velocity and fluidization rate for the FB1 (a) and FB2 (b) experiments. At different values of $q$ and $\omega _i$, the torque measurements show quasistatic or viscous stress behaviour. Both FB1 and FB2 exhibit shear weakening near $q \approx 1$ and at intermediate rotational speeds.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Flow regimes identified from observations of the FB1 (a) and FB2 (b) experiments and analysis of the torque measurements. The flow regimes include quasistatic (DGF), viscous (FRS, SGF, FGM) and inertial (TTV) rheological behaviour depending on the normalized fluidization rate, $q$, and the inner cylinder rotational speed, $\omega _i$. Estimates of the torque growth order, $\alpha \approx d (\log T_z) / d (\log \omega _i)$, are illustrated in the colour scale. Critical values of $q$ and $\omega _i$ delineating the boundaries of each regime are estimated from the experiments.

Figure 7

Figure 6. The torque ratio, $\mathcal {G}_{cc}$, against shear Reynolds number, $Re_s$, for pure liquids (a), neutrally buoyant (b), underbuoyant (c) and overbuoyant (d) suspensions. The neutrally buoyant suspension experiments from Ramesh et al. (2019) as found in (b) were collected in a $\zeta \geq 5.5, \eta \geq 0.84$ annular cell. Newtonian fluids in circular Couette flow follow the black dashed line of $\mathcal {G}_{cc} = 1$, and power laws of order $\alpha - 1 \in [0,1]$ in a state of Taylor-vortex flow. Power laws of form $\mathcal {G}_{cc} = \beta Re_s^{\alpha -1}$ and orders $\alpha - 1 = 0.5$ and $0.7$ are shown as dotted–dashed and dotted black lines, respectively, where both assume $\beta = Re_{s,c}^{1-\alpha }$ for $Re_{s,c} = 70$.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Fitted Bingham plastic parameters as found in (5.4) against the normalized fluidization rate for the FB experiments; symbol legends are found in figure 4. Panels (b) and (d) show data for $q<2$. The yield stress, $\tau _y$, is shown relative to the average quasistatic shear stress with $\tau _{q=0} = 225$ Pa for FB1 and $160$ Pa for FB2. The yield stress measurements for the DGF flow regime in figure 5 ($q \leq 0.5$ for FB1 and $q \leq 0.8$ for FB2) follow the relationship $\tau _y = \tau _{q=0} (1 - q)$ as shown by the dashed black line in (a,b). Panels (c) and (d) show the plastic viscosity, $\mu _p$, against $q$.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Fitted Carreau fluid parameters for the FB experiments as found in (5.8) against the normalized fluidization with (b), (d) and (f) showing $q<2$. The initial viscosity, $\mu _0$, is shown in (a) and (b) and the relaxation time, $\lambda$, in (c) and (d). Panels (e) and (f) show the power index, $n$, which varies between $0$ and $1$ for shear-thinning Carreau fluids. The FB2 experiments show a maximum with $n=0.19$, whereas the FB1 experiments increase up to $n = 0.56$.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Dimensionless torque, defined in (5.1), against gap Reynolds number for all experiments. The black dashed lines show the analytical relationship between $G$ and $Re_b$ for Newtonian fluids in circular Couette flow, as specified in (5.2). Power-law relationships of form $G = \beta Re_b^{\alpha }$ are shown for $\alpha = 1.5$ (dotted–dashed) and $1.7$ (dotted) as black lines. In both cases, the scaling is taken to be $\beta = 4 {\rm \pi}r_i r_o^2 / [ (r_o^2 - r_i^2 ) (r_o - r_i) ] Re_{b,c}^{1-\alpha }$, where $Re_{b,c} = 50$.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Comparison between DGF fluidized beds and gravimetrically imbalanced suspensions using fitted Bingham models. Panel (a) features the torque ratio, $\mathcal {G}_{B}$, equal to the measured torque relative to that predicted by the Bingham model, plotted against the corrected gap Reynolds number, $Re_b^*$, which accounts for the evolving width of the shear region, $r_c-r_i$. The dotted black line shows the power-law relationship of order $\alpha - 1 = 0.7$, where the coefficient is $\beta = Re_{b,c}^{1-\alpha }, Re_{b,c} = 50$. Inset (b) shows the quasistatic stress ratio, $\tau ^*$, against the inverse Bingham number, $\varGamma$, where the black dashed line is the idealized relationship $\tau ^* = \varGamma + 1$. The UB1 and UB2 data use $\tau _y = 4.00$ and $1.97$ Pa and plastic viscosities $\mu _p = 2.49 \times 10^{-2}$ and $2.01 \times 10^{-2}\ \textrm {Pa}\ \textrm {s}$, respectively; the XB1 and XB2 data use $\tau _y = 2.84$ and $3.55$ Pa, and $\mu _p = 2.73 \times 10^{-2}$ and $4.73 \times 10^{-2}\ \textrm {Pa}\ \textrm {s}$.