Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:01:39.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Saproxylic community, guild and species responses to varying pheromone components of a pine bark beetle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2013

Iñaki Etxebeste*
Affiliation:
Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute, University of Valladolid -CIFOR-INIA, Avd. Valladolid 44, 34004 Palencia, Spain
José L. Lencina
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, University of Murcia, Apdo. 4021. 30071 Murcia, Spain
Juan Pajares
Affiliation:
Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute, University of Valladolid -CIFOR-INIA, Avd. Valladolid 44, 34004 Palencia, Spain
*
*Author for correspondence: Phone: +34 679 00 22 88 Fax: +34 979 10 84 19 E-mail: inaki@goisolutions.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some bark beetle species (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) produce aggregation pheromones that allow coordinated attack on their conifer hosts. As a new saproxylic habitat is founded, an assemblage of associated beetles kairomonally respond to bark beetle infochemicals. Ips sexdentatus is one of the major damaging insects of Pinus spp. in Southern Europe. Its response to varying ipsenol (Ie) percentages in relation to ipsdienol (Id) was studied in northwestern Spain, along with the entire saproxylic beetle assemblage captured at multiple-funnel traps. Response profile modeling was undertaken for I.sexdentatus sexes and sex-ratios, associated species and for selected trophic groups using a reference Gaussian model. In addition, the effects on the saproxylic assemblages were analyzed. I. sexdentatus response curve peaked at 22.7% Ie content, while remaining taxa that could be modeled, peaked above ca. 40% Ie. Predator guilds showed a linear relationship with Ie proportion, while competitors showed a delayed response peak. Consequently, species assemblages differed markedly between varying pheromone component mixtures. Given that the evaluated pheromonal proportions mimicked that of logs being colonized by I. sexdentatus, results suggested that the registered differential responses at different levels might provide I.sexdentatus with a temporal window that maximizes conspecific attraction while reducing interference with competitor and predatory guilds. Described responses might help improve the monitoring of the population status of target bark beetles and their associates, but also point toward the by-catch of many natural enemies, as well as rare saproxylic beetle species, interfering with the aims of sustainable forest management.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1. Effect of increasing Ie proportion in lures on mean accumulated catches ± SEM (n = 7) of I.sexdentatus (total, female, male and sex ratio) and other known saproxylic beetles. Shown species had accumulated catches of 20 or more individuals. See Appendix Table A1 for full scientific names and classifications. F and P(>F) values of the treatment effects at the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of fitted GLM are presented for each species. Asterisks after P(>F) values highlight: *, <0.05; **, <0.01 and ***, <0.001 significances. Shared letters within the same species indicate that means are not significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, Bonferroni's adjustment, P < 0.05).

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Accumulated trap-catch data and the sex-ratio of I.sexdentatus in response to increasing proportions of Ie in the pheromonal blend. Back-transformed location of the response peaks (μr) and width (2σr) of the response window are shown in the plot. (a) Mean relative I.sexdentatus catch ± SEM (n = 7) and fitted Gaussian response curve. (b) Registered and predicted sex-ratio for I.sexdentatus after fitting the Gaussian curve. Catch data (y-axis) were rescaled so that the treatment with highest catch = 1 for each data set. See table 2 for parameter estimates.

Figure 2

Table 2. Parameter estimates with their SE and goodness of fit of non-linear regression of Gaussian curve to response of I. sexdentatus (total, male and females) and other known saproxylic beetles. Cumulative response of intraguild competitors is also shown. In all cases, three and four regression and residual degrees of freedom, respectively.

Figure 3

Table 3. Parameter estimates with their SE and goodness of fit of linear regression of the response of trapped saproxylic beetles and trophic guilds that did not show a Gaussian response. In all the cases, one and five regression and residual degrees of freedom, respectively. Asterisks after P(>F) values highlight: *, <0.05; **, <0.01 and ***, <0.001 significances.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Accumulated trap catches of competitor and predator guild associates and their modeled linear and Gaussian fitting in response to increasing proportions of ipsenol in the pheromonal blend. Predicted I.sexdentatus response is also shown for comparison. (a) Intraguild (xylophage) predator response. (b) Predator response. (c) Intraguild (xylophage) competitor response. See Materials and methods section for guild descriptions. Catch data (y-axis) were rescaled so that the treatment with highest catch = 1 for each data set. See tables 2 and 3 for parameter estimates.

Figure 5

Table 4. Effect of increasing Ie proportion in lures on mean accumulated catches ± SEM (n = 7) of the five main trophic groups. Asterisks after P(>F) values highlight: *, <0.05; **, <0.01 and ***, <0.001 significances of treatment effects. Shared letters within the same guild indicate that means are not significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, Bonferroni's adjustment, P < 0.05).

Figure 6

Table 5. Effect of increasing Ie proportion in lures on mean Shannon diversity index ± SEM (n = 7) within each trophic group Asterisks after P(>F) values highlight: *, <0.05; **, <0.01 and ***, <0.001 significances of treatment effects. Shared letters within the same guild indicate that means are not significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, Bonferroni's adjustment, P < 0.05).

Figure 7

Fig. 3. Ordination of Bray–Curtis similarities (stress 0.268) of species and specimen abundance at multiple funnel traps using NMDS. Each cross represents each of the 49 sampling units. Ellipses represent factor class standard error area at 95% confidence interval, after fitting the Ie percentage in the lure as a factor onto the ordination (shown vector, R2 = 0.58, P < 0.001, 1000 permutations).

Figure 8

Table 6. P values of pairwise comparison tests (ADONIS, 1000 permutations) of saproxylic beetle beta diversity between treatment levels.

Figure 9

Fig. 4. Temporal evolution of the percentage of Ie in relation to Id in frass extracts of boring I.sexdentatus males. Data from Kohnle (1991) obtained through closed-loop stripping analysis , followed by filter extraction by MeCl and CS2 in P. pinaster and P. sylvestris, respectively, and GC-MS. Unpublished data from Etxebeste et al. obtained through solid-phase microextraction of frass samples of two series of six I.sexdentatus males boring into a P. pinaster 50 cm long bole each.

Figure 10

Appendix: Table A1. List of saproxylic beetles captured at multiple funnel traps baited with I. sexdentatus pheromone blends at a site in Northewest Spain (UTM 29T 7390 4729), arranged by trophic guilds. Species richness (S) and total catches per species and trophic guild are provided too.