Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T20:56:38.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrodynamic force on a sphere normal to an obstacle due to a non-uniform flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Bhargav Rallabandi*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Sascha Hilgenfeldt
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1206 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Howard A. Stone*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
*
†Email addresses for correspondence: vbr@princeton.edu, hastone@princeton.edu
†Email addresses for correspondence: vbr@princeton.edu, hastone@princeton.edu

Abstract

For a small sphere suspended in a background fluid flow near an obstacle, we calculate the hydrodynamic force on the sphere in the direction normal to the boundary of the obstacle. Using the Lorentz reciprocal theorem, we obtain analytical expressions for the normal force in the Stokes flow limit, valid for arbitrary separations of the particle from the obstacle, both for solid obstacles and those with free surfaces. The main effect of the boundary is to produce a normal force proportional to extensional flow gradients in the vicinity of the particle. The strength of this force is greatest when the separation between the surfaces of the particle and the obstacle is small relative to the particle size. While the magnitude of the force weakens for large separations between the sphere and the obstacle (decaying quadratically with separation distance), it can significantly modify Faxén’s law even at modestly large separation distances. In addition, we find a second force contribution due to the curvature of the background flow normal to the obstacle, which is also important when the sphere is close to the obstacle. The results of the theory are of importance to the dynamics of particles in confined geometries, whether bounded by a solid obstacle, the wall of a channel or a gas bubble.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) General set-up of the problem of a small spherical particle of radius $a$ immersed in a background flow field $\boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x})$ at a distance $h$ from a large obstacle of radius of curvature $R$. The characteristic scale of the flow is $\ell \gg a$; $\ell =O(R)$ in many situations. (b) A sketch of the geometry relevant to the disturbance flow problem in the vicinity of the particle. The obstacle surface is assumed to be locally spherical with a radius $R\gtrsim \ell \gg a$. (c) An example with $\ell \ll R$ is the pressure-driven flow of particle-laden fluids through channels of non-uniform shape; as sketched, the walls are locally planar.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Parametrization of the particle surface in polar coordinates ($\tilde{r},\tilde{z}$), showing intrinsic coordinates ($s$, $n$). The evaluation of the force ultimately involves bipolar coordinates ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D709},\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$), which are introduced in § 4. Here, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ are dimensionless quantities relevant to the bipolar coordinate system that are related to $h/a$ and $R/a$ and are defined in § 4.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Resistance coefficients for the cases of an obstacle with (a) a solid surface and (b) a stress-free interface in the limit of a weakly curved obstacle ($a/R\rightarrow 0\;\Longleftrightarrow \;\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\rightarrow 0$). Dashed lines indicate the leading asymptotic behaviour for large and small $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}$.

Figure 3

Table 1. Asymptotic behaviour of the resistance coefficients for small and large separations for small particles $(a\lesssim h\ll R\;\Longleftrightarrow \;|\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}|\ll 1)$, with subscripts $\text{I}$ and $\text{II}$ indicating, respectively, no-slip and stress-free obstacle boundaries, e.g. equation (2.2). The $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}\ll 1$ asymptotes are obtained applying the method of Cox & Brenner (1967) to the expressions (C 3). The $O(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}^{0})$ constants in the $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}\ll 1$ expressions are computed by a numerical integration of known analytic functions involving polynomials and hyperbolic functions. The asymptotes for $R/a\gg \unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}\gg 1$ are calculated by a regular perturbation expansion of (C 3) for large $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$; curvature corrections of relative order $h/R\ll 1$ have been retained in this limit.

Figure 4

Figure 4. A particle held stationary in a normally incident stagnation flow $\boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x})$ near an obstacle. In the limit of small separations $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}\equiv (h/a)-1\ll 1$, $\boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x})$ can be approximated using a Taylor expansion about the point $\boldsymbol{x}=\mathbf{0}$ and has a generic structure that depends critically on the boundary conditions at $S_{w}$. As a result, the external force required to keep the particle stationary close to the obstacle surface is much greater for a stress-free $S_{w}$ in comparison with that for a no-slip $S_{w}$ due to the generally larger surface velocities in the former, see (5.6), (5.7). In both cases, the force on the stationary particle becomes independent of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}$ for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}\ll 1$.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Ratios ${\mathcal{B}}/{\mathcal{A}}$, ${\mathcal{C}}/2{\mathcal{A}}$ and ${\mathcal{D}}/2{\mathcal{A}}$ that govern the motion of a force-free particle relative to the fluid for (a) no-slip and (b) stress-free conditions on the obstacle in the limit $a/R\rightarrow 0$. Note that the velocity of the particle relative to the fluid due to flow curvature (coefficients ${\mathcal{C}}/2{\mathcal{A}}$ and ${\mathcal{D}}/2{\mathcal{A}}$) is multiplied by an $O(a^{2}/\ell ^{2})$ factor, while the contribution of extensional flow gradients (quantified by ${\mathcal{B}}/2{\mathcal{A}}$) is multiplied by a much larger $O(a/\ell )$ factor. The relative importance of the terms therefore depends both on $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}$ and $a/\ell$ in addition to the flow properties. Dashed lines are leading-order asymptotes for large and small $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}$ and follow from the results in table 1.