Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T02:26:19.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gamete quality in fish: evaluation parameters and determining factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2013

Iván I. Valdebenito*
Affiliation:
Universidad Católica de Temuco, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Escuela de Acuicultura, Rudecindo Ortega 02950 Casilla 15-D, Temuco, Chile.
Patricia C. Gallegos
Affiliation:
Universidad Católica de Temuco, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Escuela de Acuicultura, Rudecindo Ortega 02950 Casilla 15-D, Temuco, Chile.
Brian R. Effer
Affiliation:
Universidad Católica de Temuco, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Escuela de Acuicultura, Rudecindo Ortega 02950 Casilla 15-D, Temuco, Chile.
*
All correspondence to: Iván I. Valdebenito. Universidad Católica de Temuco, Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Escuela de Acuicultura, Rudecindo Ortega 02950 Casilla 15-D, Temuco, Chile. e-mail: ivisler@uct.cl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The quality of fish gametes, both male and female, are determined by several factors (age, management, feeding, chemical and physical factors, water quality, etc.) that have an impact on the survivability of embryos, larvae and/or fry in the short or long term. One of the most important factors is gamete ageing, especially for those species that are unable to spawn naturally in hatcheries. The chemical and physical factors in hatcheries and the nutrition that they provide can significantly alter harvest quality, especially from females; as a rule, males are more tolerant of stress conditions produced by inadequate feeding, management and/or poor water conditions. The stress produced on broodstock by inadequate conditions in hatcheries can produce adverse effects on gamete quality, survival rates, and the embryonic eggs after hatching.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Factors that determine gamete quality in fish. Balanced (A); and unbalanced (B).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Oocytes of apparently good quality (A) and over-ripe (B, arrows) of rainbow trout (O. mykiss) before fertilization. Over-ripe Atlantic salmon (S. salar) eggs in the abdominal cavity of a female (C, arrows); and after hydration (D, arrows).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Rainbow trout oocyte (O. mykiss) with different concentrations of carotenoid pigments, but all of similar quality.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Fertilized inanga (G. maculatus) oocytes, with developed perivitelline space with blastodiscs (black arrows); and unfertilized, with the absence of perivitelline space and blastodisc (white arrow).

Figure 4

Figure 5 Coho salmon (O. kisutch) blastodiscs with normal (A) and abnormal (B) cleavages. Magnification ×56.

Figure 5

Figure 6 Characteristics of Atlantic salmon broodstock raised solely in fresh water in southern Chile. (A) Broodstock tank. (B) Ovary with atretic follicles. (C) Four-year-old male showing evident signs of maturity. (D) Preparation of testicular macerate.

Figure 6

Figure 7 Cold storage (2–4°C) of Atlantic salmon semen in southern Chile. (A) Refrigerator with semen containers. (B) Contaminated semen (green) after 5 days in storage.

Figure 7

Figure 8 Cryopreservation protocols for salmonid semen in southern Chile. (A) Extraction of semen from coho salmon. (B) Handling liquid nitrogen. (C) Storage of straws in liquid nitrogen. (D) Straws during freezing using ‘in situ’ system. (E) Programmable system for freezing semen.