Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T20:25:08.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of temperature on the small-strain viscous deformation mechanics of snow: a comparison with polycrystalline ice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Carlo Scapozza
Affiliation:
Institute for Geotechnical Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland E-mail: c.scapozza@igt.baug.ethz.chWSL Swiss Federal Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Perry A. Bartelt
Affiliation:
WSL Swiss Federal Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), Flüelastrasse 11, CH-7260 Davos Dorf, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glen’s law is commonly used to model the viscous deformation of polycrystalline ice. It is a power law that relates stress to viscous strain rate and contains three material parameters: n, a power-law exponent, Q, an activation energy, and A 0, a material constant. Because polycrystalline ice is the constituent material of snow, it is to be expected that the viscous deformation mechanics of snow are related to the viscous behaviour of polycrystalline ice, especially under small strains and low strain rates when kinematic effects in the ice matrix like bond breakage, bond formation and grain sliding are of secondary importance. Based on 64 deformation-controlled compression tests on fine-grained snow in the density range 200–430kg m–3 and temperature range T = –20 to –2°C, we show that Glen’s law—with material parameters similar to those for polycrystalline ice—can be applied to model the viscous deformation of high-density snow However, the values of the ice material parameters are valid for densities above a relatively low density of 400 kg m–3; they are not valid for snow with densities below 360 kg m–3. We present the variation of n, Q and A for snow as a function of density and temperature. A possible explanation for this behaviour is that the ice grains in low-density snow are less constrained. Therefore, deformation mechanisms, such as grain-boundary sliding, increase in overall importance, leading to smaller n values and higher activation energies, Q. Although the material behaviour of low-density snow can be accurately modelled using a power law, the power-law parameters depart substantially from those of polycrystalline ice. The large variation of n and Q with temperature and density underscores the difficulty of predicting snow avalanches.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2003
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Stress–strain curves for four different temperatures and strain rates, density ρ = 272 kg m–3. (a) T = –18.9°C, ɛ̇ = 4.4 x 10–5s–1; (b) T = –18.9°C, ɛ̇ = 4.2 x 10–6s–1; (c) T= –5.0° C, ɛ̇ = 4.4x10–5s–1; (d) T= –5.0˚C, = 4.2 x 10–2s–1. The yield stress, σy is indicated.

Figure 1

Table 1.Test parameters. In all, 64 tests were completed. For each density, four different strain rates were applied at four different temperatures

Figure 2

Fig. 2.Applied axial strain rate vs axial yield stress; n is the exponent of the power law (Equation (1)). Density ρ = 423 kg m–3.

Figure 3

Table 2.Yield stress σy as a function of strain rate, temperature and density

Figure 4

Fig. 3.Temperature and density dependence of the exponent n for strain rates ranging between ɛ̇ = 1.1 x 10–6 s–1and ɛ̇ = 4.4 x 10–5 s–1.

Figure 5

Fig. 4.Temperature and density dependence of the apparent activation energy Q for different strain rates. (a) ɛ̇ =1.1 x 10–5 s–1; (b) ɛ̇ = 4.2 × 10-6 s-1; (c) ɛ̇ = 1.1 ×10-6s-1; (d) ɛ̇ = 4.4 × 10-5s-1; (e) mean value.

Figure 6

Fig. 5.The load-bearing “chain” concept of Gubler (1978), with a detailed picture of a neck formed between grains (from Colbeck, 1998). The grain boundary is also depicted.

Figure 7

Fig. 6.Material parameter A (Equation (1) ) as afunction of density, for T = –12°C and for strain rates ranging between "s_=1.1610– 6 s–1 and "s_=4.4610– 5 s–1. The values are compared with (a) the A values for high-density firn and porous ice (659 kg m–3 ≤ ρ ≤ 912 kgm3) calculated using the test results of mono-axial compression tests (T = –3.3°C, octahedral shear stress = 0.2 MPa) reported by Jacka (1994); the test results were normalized to T = –12°C using Q = 160 kJ mol–1; (b) the A values for polycrystalline ice calculated with the parameters A0, Q and n reported by Barnes and others (1971) for T =–12° C.

Figure 8

Fig. 7.Weak-layer finite-element model. L=50m is the length of the slope, a = 8 m is the length of the weak layer and ϕ = 35° is the inclination. The snow cover is composed of two layers with d1 = d2 = 1.0 m and a very thin weak layer with ds → 0 m. Densities and temperatures are ρ1 = 400 kg m–3,ρ2 = 200 kg m–3,T1 = –5°C. T2 varies between T2=–12°C and T2=–3°C.

Figure 9

Fig. 8.Influence of the temperature on the strain-rate distribution along the weak layer. The properties of the simulated snowpack are shown in Figure 7.