Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T15:17:53.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative study on heat stability of camel and bovine apo and holo α-lactalbumin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Maliheh Sadat Atri
Affiliation:
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Ali Akbar Saboury*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Reza Yousefi
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran
Michèle Dalgalarrondo
Affiliation:
UR 1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, INRA, équipe Fonctions et Interactions des Protéines Laitières, B.P. 71627, 44316 Nantes Cedex 3, France
Jean-Marc Chobert
Affiliation:
UR 1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, INRA, équipe Fonctions et Interactions des Protéines Laitières, B.P. 71627, 44316 Nantes Cedex 3, France
Thomas Haertlé
Affiliation:
UR 1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, INRA, équipe Fonctions et Interactions des Protéines Laitières, B.P. 71627, 44316 Nantes Cedex 3, France
Ali Akbar Moosavi-Movahedi
Affiliation:
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: saboury@ut.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The stability of camel α-lactalbumin (α-la) against heat denaturation was measured, using circular dichroism (CD) and fluorescence spectroscopy, as well as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The experiments were performed in the presence of saturating concentrations of calcium as well as in the presence of EDTA, yielding to the apo form of α-la. The change in heat capacity (ΔCp) suggests a greater contribution of hydrophobic interactions to the stability of holo camel α-la than in its bovine counterpart. Overall the results obtained in this study suggest a greater stability of camel α-la than the bovine protein in both holo and apo states. Also CD experiments showed similar secondary structure for camel and bovine α-la and secondary structure of camel α-la was better preserved than that of bovine α-la during heat denaturation. The differences in thermal stability between the proteins from two species can be primarily ascribed to the difference in the quantity of hydrophobic interactions involved in their folding.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sequence alignment of bovine and camel α-La. Protein sequence alignment was done with CLUSTALW (v. 2.0.11; http://www.ebi.ac.uk). PubMed accession numbers are P00710 (camel) and Q28049 (bovine). Identical (*), conserved (:) and semi-conserved (.) amino acids in two sequences are marked.

Figure 1

Table 1. The thermodynamic parameters of thermal unfolding of bovine and camel proteins in calcium loaded (holo) and calcium depleted (apo) states

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Plot of measured heat capacity against temperature for camel (1) and bovine (2) α-La in 20 mm-Tris-HCl, pH 7·5, in the presence of (A) 2 mm-CaCl2 (holo form) or (B) 3·5 mm-EDTA (apo form). Protein concentration was 70 μm. Dashed lines represent the polynomial baseline fit.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. The intrinsic (A) and ANS fluorescence emission spectra (B) of 10 μm-camel apo α-la (○), camel holo α-la (•), bovine apo α-la (▵), bovine holo α-la (▴), and ANS alone (-) in 20 mm-Tris-HCl, pH 7·5, in the presence of 2 mm-CaCl2 (holo form) or 3·5 mm-EDTA (apo form) at 20°C. The excitation wavelengths were 280 nm (A) and 350 nm (B) with slits of 5 and 10 nm, respectively.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Far-UV circular dichroism spectra of 15 μm-camel apo α-la (○), camel holo α-la (•), bovine apo α-la (▵), and bovine holo α-la (▴) in 20 mm-Tris-HCl (pH 7·5) at 25°C.

Figure 5

Table 2. The secondary structure content of camel and bovine α-la

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Thermal unfolding profile of α-La monitored by ellipticity at 222 nm; Total α-la concentration was 15 μm in 20 mm-Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7·5, containing 2 mm-CaCl2 (holo form) or 3·5 mm-EDTA (apo form). The lines represent the sigmoidal curve fit to the unfolding data and error bars denote standard deviation from the mean values. Symbols are identical to those of Fig. 4.