Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:26:56.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Associations between population epigenetic differentiation and environmental factors in the exotic weed mile-a-minute (Mikania micrantha)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2021

Jin Shen
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Zhen Wang
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Yingjuan Su*
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; Research Institute of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
Ting Wang
Affiliation:
Professor, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Authors for correspondence: Yingjuan Su, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China (Email: suyj@mail.sysu.edu.cn); Ting Wang, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China (Email: tingwang@scau.edu.cn).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Invasive species face new selective pressures and low genetic variation caused by genetic bottlenecks and founder effects when they are introduced into novel environments. Epigenetic variation may help them to cope with these problems. Mile-a-minute (Mikania micrantha Kunth) is a highly invasive exotic weed that has seriously damaged biodiversity and agricultural ecosystems. We first adopted methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) markers to investigate epigenetic variation of 21 M. micrantha populations in southern China, and further explored the effects of environmental factors on population epigenetic differentiation by correlating epigenetic and climate and soil data. Adaptive epiloci positively correlated with climate/soil variables were identified. Minimum temperature of the coldest month and mean temperature of the coldest quarter were considered as decisive factors for its distribution. Climate is presumed to play a relatively more important role than soil in shaping the adaptive epigenetic differentiation in M. micrantha. Under ongoing global warming, populations of M. micrantha are predicted to expand northward. In addition, the weed also presented higher epigenetic variation compared with genetic variation. Leaf shape variation was detected related to methylation-state change at the population level.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America
Figure 0

Figure 1. Sampling map of 21 Mikania micrantha populations in southern China. See Table 1 for population codes.

Figure 1

Table 1. Sampling information of Mikania micrantha populations.

Figure 2

Table 2. Information for adopted adapters and primers used in this study.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) electrophoresis was performed on an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer with internal size standard LIZ 500 for E7/H8 primer combination. H and M represent digestion with EcoRI/HpaII and EcoRI/MspI, respectively. Blue and orange bands show the amplification products and the standard marker, respectively.

Figure 4

Table 3. Methylation status, band pattern, and scoring methods.

Figure 5

Table 4. Genetic and epigenetic diversity in regions based on the six matrices.

Figure 6

Table 5. Percentage of three methylation states.

Figure 7

Figure 3. Leaf shape of Mikania micrantha varied by population and region. (A) Leaf shape parameter in 21 populations. (B) Leaf shape variation in six regions. (C) A high leaf length:width ratio is represented using individual 6 of the HK5 population. (D) A low leaf length:width ratio is represented using individual 11 of the NLD3 population. See Table 1 for population codes.

Figure 8

Table 6. Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA).

Figure 9

Table 7. Fst value from six matrices at regional and species levels.a

Figure 10

Figure 4. STRUCTURE results with different K values for the six matrices. See Table 1 for population codes.

Figure 11

Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) results for the six matrices. See Table 1 for population codes.

Figure 12

Figure 6. UPGMA tree computed using PAUP based on the six matrices. The number on the branch indicates the bootstrap value. See Table 1 for population codes.

Figure 13

Figure 7. Large-scale spatial structure with five distance classes based on the six matrices. An asterisk (*) indicates significance level (P < 0.05).

Figure 14

Figure 8. Fine-scale spatial structure at 10 distance classes based on six matrices. An asterisk (*) indicates significance level (P < 0.05).

Figure 15

Figure 9. Outliers were identified by Dfdist analysis. The red dots indicate positively selective loci.

Figure 16

Figure 10. Candidate positively selective loci were detected by Bayescan analysis. Decisive selected loci were determined according to ln (PO) ≥ 2.

Figure 17

Figure 11. Correlation was investigated between adaptive loci and environmental factors. The correlation range was from −1 to 1. Positive and negative values indicated that loci were positively and negatively correlated with the environmental factors, respectively. The greater the absolute value, the stronger the correlation, and vice versa.

Figure 18

Figure 12. A linkage disequilibrium (LD) test was conducted among adaptive loci. Areas above and below the diagonal indicate the R2 and P-value, respectively.

Figure 19

Figure 13. Current (A) and potential future distribution (B) of Mikania micrantha predicted based on Maxent.

Figure 20

Figure 14. Response curves of Mikania micrantha to environmental gradients. The edges of the red and blue curves represent the average response and the standard deviation range, respectively.

Figure 21

Figure 15. Evaluation of climate variable contribution using the jackknife test. Blue bars represent contribution of each variable; green bars, without variable; red bar, with all variables.

Figure 22

Table 8. Genetic and epigenetic diversity of neutral and adaptive loci.a

Figure 23

Table 9. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on neutral and adaptive loci.

Figure 24

Table 10. Mantel test based on neutral and adaptive locus matrices.

Figure 25

Figure 16. Structure results of neutral or adaptive loci based on the six matrices. See Table 1 for population codes.

Figure 26

Figure 17. Fine-scale spatial structure of neutral and adaptive loci based on the six matrices. An asterisk (*) indicates significance level (P < 0.05).

Supplementary material: File

Shen et al. supplementary material

Shen et al. supplementary material

Download Shen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.9 KB