Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:46:35.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Steps toward efficient inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2015

Jun Hong Noh
Affiliation:
Division of Advanced Materials, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, South Korea; jhnoh@krict.re.kr
Sang Il Seok
Affiliation:
Division of Advanced Materials, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, South Korea; seoksi@krict.re.kr; Department of Energy Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea; seoksi@skku.edu

Abstract

Crystalline silicon dominates the solar panel industry today but remains relatively expensive to manufacture. If devices could be fabricated from inexpensive materials by a simple solution process without the need for high-temperature annealing, their cost could be considerably reduced. Recently, inorganic–organic (I/O) hybrid systems based on inorganic nanoparticles (including quantum dots) and perovskite materials as light harvesters with organic hole-conducting materials have shown great potential for efficient solar cells due to the combination of superior optical properties and solution-based processes. In this review, we describe the relevant morphological factors and the performance of perovskite solar cells with tuned heterojunctions. In particular, we describe the mediator retarding the rapid crystallization of perovskite layers for a bilayer configuration. Appropriate processes and chemical engineering induced the formation of well-crystallized perovskite materials with extremely uniform and dense perovskite layers and remarkably improved the performance of the cells with a National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)-certified record efficiency of 20.1%.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Evolution of cell architecture: (a) solid-state Sb2S3-sensitized solar cell,3 (b) pillared perovskite solar cell,7 and (c) bilayered perovskite solar-cell architectures.21 (d) n-i-p and p-i-n cell architectures.27,28 Representative materials are inserted in parentheses. Note: HTM, hole transporting material; P3HT, poly(3-hexylthiophene); Bl, barrier layer; FTO, fluorine-doped tin oxide; PTAA, poly-triarylamine; mp, mesoporous; ITO, indium-doped tin oxide; PEDOT:PSS, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate; PCBM, [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester. Adapted from References 3, 7, 21, 27, and 28.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Processes using mediators to control rapid self-assembly crystallization and to further improve the quality of the perovskite film: (a) solvent engineering process21 and (b) intramolecular exchanging process34 are represented as successful examples; and (c) an advanced mediator and process will be needed to deposit high-quality perovskite films. Adapted from Reference 27. Note: DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; FA, formamidinium; MA, methylammonium; FAI, formamidinium iodide.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) The current density–voltage (J–V) curves of the highest performing Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology perovskite cells since 2013 and (b) their external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra.21,26,34 (c) The photovoltaic parameters are summarized. J–V curves and parameters were obtained by averaging reverse and forward sweeps to avoid overestimation due to hysteresis. The introduction of FAPbI3 resulted in an increase of Jsc due to broad absorption of solar light. Note: Jsc, short-circuit current density; Voc, open-circuit voltage; FF, fill factor; PCE, power conversion efficiency. Adapted from References 21, 26, and 34.