Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:06:35.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inductive link for power and data transfer to a medical implant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Giuseppina Monti*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy. Phone: +39 0832 297365
Maria Valeria De Paolis
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy. Phone: +39 0832 297365
Laura Corchia
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy. Phone: +39 0832 297365
Mauro Mongiardo
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
Luciano Tarricone
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy. Phone: +39 0832 297365
*
Corresponding author: G. Monti Email: giuseppina.monti@unisalento.it

Abstract

This paper presents a resonant inductive link for power and data transfer to a pulse generator implanted in the chest. The proposed link consists of two planar resonators and has been optimized for operating in the MedRadio band centered at 403 MHz. The wireless power/data link occurs between an external resonator operating in direct contact with the skin and a receiving resonator integrated in the silicone header of a pulse generator implanted in the chest. Numerical and experimental results are presented and discussed. From measurements performed by using minced pork to simulate the presence of human tissues, an efficiency of about 51% is demonstrated. The feasibility of using the proposed link for recharging the battery of the medical device in compliance with safety regulations is also verified and discussed.

Information

Type
Wirelessly Powering: The Future
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Configuration adopted for the WPT link: the primary resonator operates in direct contact with the skin, whereas the secondary resonator is embedded into the silicone header of a pacemaker implanted in a layer of muscle and below a layer of skin and fat. The two resonators are at a distance d = 5 mm (the secondary resonator is implanted into the muscle layer under a 2 mm layer of skin and a 2 mm layer of fat).

Figure 1

Table 1. Parameters adopted in full-wave simulations for human tissues.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Receiving resonator integrated into the silicone header of a pacemaker. For the dimensions of the pacemaker, the Vitatron T60 DR has been taken as a reference.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a) Geometry of the secondary resonator. The distributed inductance is realized on the front and back face of the Arlon substrate. (b) Geometry of the primary resonator. In this case, the distributed inductance is realized on the front face of the substrate and a high electric permittivity superstrate is used.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Results obtained from full-wave simulations for the scattering parameters of the proposed WPT link (the normalization impedance is 50 Ω).

Figure 5

Table 2. Dimensions of the resonators.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Photographs of the fabricated resonators. (a) Front view: primary resonator on the left and secondary resonator on the right. (b) Back view: primary resonator on the left and secondary resonator on the right.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Photographs of the setup adopted for measurements. (a) Prototype simulating the integration into the silicone header of a pacemaker. (b) Setup adopted for measuring the scattering parameters of the link. A minced pork has been used for simulating the presence of human tissues.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Results obtained from measurements for the scattering parameters of the proposed WPT link (the normalization impedance is 50 Ω, i.e. RG = RL = 50 Ω).

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Schematic representation of the wireless energy link.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. RF-to-RF efficiency for RG = RL = 50 Ω. Comparison between numerical and experimental data.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. RF-to-RF efficiency for RG = RL = 50 Ω. Results obtained from full-wave simulations of the proposed link with and without the silicone header.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Results achieved by varying the thickness of the skin layer (d_skin) in the range of 2–3 mm, thus corresponding to an overall implantation depth (d) varying in the range of 5–6 mm.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Results achieved by varying the thickness of the fat layer (d_fat) in the range of 2–5 mm, thus corresponding to an overall implantation depth (d) varying in the range of 5–8 mm.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Results achieved by varying the implantation depth into the muscle layer in the range of 1–3 mm, thus corresponding to an overall implantation depth (d) varying in the range of 5–7 mm.

Figure 15

Fig. 14. Results achieved for the case where the medical device is implanted under the skin: d_skin coincides with the distance between the two resonators (d).

Figure 16

Fig. 15. The case of misaligned resonators: (a) misalignment due to a shift on the xy plane; (b) misalignment due to a rotation of the receiver in the yz plane.

Figure 17

Fig. 16. Results achieved when the resonators are misaligned as illustrated in Fig. 15(a).

Figure 18

Fig. 17. Results achieved when the resonators are misaligned as illustrated in Fig. 15(b).

Figure 19

Fig. 18. Results achieved by using a textile material with a thickness ‘dpr’ and a relative electric permittivity εtex for separating the primary resonator from the skin.

Figure 20

Fig. 19. Schematic representation of a wireless battery charger.

Figure 21

Fig. 20. Results obtained by full-wave simulations for the 10 g average SAR by varying the value of the power provided to the primary resonator (continuous blue line). The triangles are the maximum values of the capacity, which can be recharged in a charging time of 4 h (a) and 6 h (b). In more detail, the green triangles refer to the case of a battery charger with an efficiency ηRF−DC equal to 70%; while the red triangles refer to the case a battery charger with an efficiency ηRF−DC equal to 90%. The red dashed line is the limit imposed by safety regulations for the 10 g average SAR.