Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:31:36.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Episodic deposition of Illinois Valley Peoria silt in association with Lake Michigan Lobe fluctuations during the last glacial maximum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2017

Thomas A. Nash
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
Jessica L. Conroy*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
David A. Grimley
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA Illinois State Geological Survey, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA
William R. Guenthner
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
Ben Brandon Curry
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA Illinois State Geological Survey, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA
*
*Corresponding author at: Department of Geology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA. E-mail address: jconro@illinois.edu (J.L. Conroy).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The chronology and cause of millennial depositional oscillations within last glacial loess of the Central Lowlands of the United States are uncertain. Here, we present a new age model that indicates the Peoria Silt along the Illinois River Valley accumulated episodically from ~28,500 to 16,000 cal yr BP, as the Lake Michigan Lobe margin fluctuated within northeastern Illinois. The age model indicates accelerated loess deposition coincident with regional glacial advances during the local last glacial maximum. A weakly developed paleosol, the Jules Geosol, represents a period of significantly slower deposition, from 23,700 to 22,000 cal yr BP. A gastropod assemblage-based reconstruction of mean July temperature shows temperatures 6–10°C cooler than modern during Peoria Silt deposition. Stable oxygen and carbon isotope values (δ18O and δ13C) of gastropod carbonate do not vary significantly across the pedostratigraphic boundary of the Jules Geosol, suggesting slower loess accumulation was a result of reduced glacial sediment supply rather than direct climatic factors. However, a decrease in δ18O values occurred between 26,000 and 24,000 cal yr BP, synchronous with the Lake Michigan Lobe’s southernmost advance. This δ18O decrease suggests a coupling of regional summer hydroclimate and ice lobe position during the late glacial period.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2017 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Location of the two study sites, New Cottonwood School and Thomas Quarry, adjacent to the Illinois River valley. The green line traces the maximum extent of the Lake Michigan Lobe. Sublobes are labeled with arrows that describe the direction of ice advance. Large morainic belts (Hansel and Johnson, 1996) are delineated in light green; many smaller moraines are not shown. Loess >5 m thick is noted by light brown shading. The former path of the ancient Mississippi River, prior to its diversion to its present course, is shown as a dashed blue line. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 1

Figure 2 (A) Composite stratigraphy at the New Cottonwood School site. Magnetic susceptibility measurements were used to correlate between different subsections of the outcrop New Cottonwood School A (red, pictured) and New Cottonwood School B (blue). These subsections are laterally adjacent to each other but are separated by 2 m. (B) Composite stratigraphy at the Thomas Quarry site. Magnetic susceptibility measurements were used to correlate subsections Thomas Quarry A (red) and Thomas Quarry B (pictured; blue). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 2

Table 1 Radiocarbon ages (±1-sigma) and calibrated ages (2-sigma), rounded to nearest century, from New Cottonwood School (NCS) and Thomas Quarry (TQ) samples. Depths are in cm below ground surface for New Cottonwood School samples and cm above Roxana for Thomas Quarry. Depths in parentheses for Thomas Quarry represent depths used in Bacon program, which represent depth above ground surface.

Figure 3

Figure 3 New Cottonwood School (left, red) and Thomas Quarry (right, blue) age models. Calibrated radiocarbon age ranges are plotted in red and black. Bounding dashed lines on either side of the model indicate the 95% confidence interval. The top of the Jules Geosol was used as a datum for correlation purposes. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 4

Figure 4 Time series from the New Cottonwood School and Thomas Quarry sections, plotted versus calibrated ages. Black line and solid circles denote data from New Cottonwood School section, red line and open circles denote data from Thomas Quarry section. Brown highlighting represents the Jules Geosol zone. A) Magnetic susceptibility B) Ratio of volume percent abundance coarse and medium silt to clay, very fine silt, and fine silt C) Illite and expandable clay percent abundance (New Cottonwood School only) D) Gastropod carbonate δ13C values E) Gastropod carbonate δ18O values. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 5

Figure 5 Box and whisker plots of gastropod carbonate (A) δ18O values and (B) δ13C from New Cottonwood School (NCS) and Thomas Quarry (TQ), grouped by zone. The black line within each box represents the median δ18O or δ13C value. The box boundaries represent±25% of the variable population. Whisker ends represent data minima and maxima, excluding outliers (open circles), defined as values greater (less) than the upper (lower) quartile value plus 1.5 times inner quartile difference.

Figure 6

Figure 6 Representation of species presence/absence with changes in depth at New Cottonwood School and Thomas Quarry sections. Sinuous vertical lines represent modern soil (at New Cottonwood School) and Jules Geosol. Sampling for shells began below the bottom of the leaching horizon, 1 m below the surface at New Cottonwood School. Black bars represent the presence of that species at each depth.

Figure 7

Figure 7 (color online) Reconstructed mean July temperature range using gastropod species at New Cottonwood School and Thomas Quarry sections. Gray shaded area represents likely range of late Glacial mean July temperature at our study sites based on coolest maximum and warmest minimum temperatures. Red line represents mean modern July temperature (24.6°C) for region.

Figure 8

Figure 8 Modified Lake Michigan Lobe time-distance diagram (Caron and Curry 2016), versus the composite Peoria Silt stratigraphy based on New Cottonwood School and Thomas Quarry age-depth models (left, brown shading). Loess was deposited as the Lake Michigan Lobe advanced and retreated from its maximum southern position. JG, Jules Geosol, UP, upper Peoria Silt, mP, middle Peoria Silt, lP, lower Peoria Silt. Shaded area above dashed lines are interpolated times of loess deposition based on calculated sedimentation rates. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 9

Figure 9 Mean surface air temperature climatology for 40°N, 90°W from PMIP3 LGM simulations. Black horizontal line and gray shading represents modern July temperature and 1σ, blue shading represents gastropod-inferred mean July temperature range. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Supplementary material: File

Nash et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S4 and Tables S1-S3

Download Nash et al. supplementary material(File)
File 768.7 KB