Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T02:20:57.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immobilization antibodies of tiger puffer Takifugu rubripes induced by i.p. injection against monogenean Heterobothrium okamotoi oncomiracidia do not prevent the infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2007

N. UMEDA
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Technology Center, Nippon Suisan Kaisha, Ltd, Saeki, Oita 876-1204, Japan
A. HATANAKA
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Nippon Suisan Kaisha, Ltd, 559-6 Kitanomachi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0906, Japan
N. HIRAZAWA*
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Nippon Suisan Kaisha, Ltd, 559-6 Kitanomachi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0906, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Central Research Laboratories, Nippon Suisan Kaisha, Ltd, 559-6 Kitanomachi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0906, Japan. Tel: +81 426 56 5195. Fax: +81 426 56 5188. E-mail: n-hiraza@nissui.co.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We examined whether infection by the monogenean Heterobothrium okamotoi induces production of specific antibodies against oncomiracidia and their cilia, larvae on the gills, and adults on the branchial cavity wall of tiger puffer Takifugu rubripes. We also investigated whether specific antibody production participates in acquired protection against H. okamotoi. Sera from persistently infected fish immobilized H. okamotoi oncomiracidia 89 days after exposure and antibody levels (measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays) in the sera against oncomiracidia and their cilia increased compared with sera from control (naïve) fish. Antibody levels in these sera against the larvae and adult stages did not increase. The number of H. okamotoi on persistently infected fish was significantly lower than for control fish (P<0·05) when persistently infected fish and control fish were exposed to oncomiracidia in the same tank. Thus tiger puffer produced specific antibodies against oncomiracidia and their cilia, and acquired partial protection against H. okamotoi. Intraperitoneal injection of proteins of sonicated oncomiracidia or their cilia with an adjuvant also produced oncomiracidium agglutination antibodies in sera from tiger puffer; the antibody levels in these sera against oncomiracidia and their cilia increased compared with sera from control fish (injection of BSA with an adjuvant) at 14, 44, and 75 days after the booster immunization. However, in a parasite challenge at 54–58 days after the booster immunization, the infection levels of fish immunized with parasites of sonicated oncomiracidia or their cilia were the same as the control fish. Western blot showed that sera from persistently infected fish and fish immunized with sonicated oncomiracidia or their cilia recognized similar antigenic bands, suggesting that tiger puffer tends to react against these antigens compared with other antigens. These results indicated that specific antibodies against these cilia and oncomiracidia induced by i.p. injection do not prevent H. okamotoi infection.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
Figure 0

Table 1. Time-line diagram of preparation of experimentally infected fish with Heterobothrium okamotoi to analyse parasite-specific antibodies and infection level

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Agglutination activity of sera from tiger puffer against Heterobothrium okamotoi oncomiracidia. Oncomiracidia treated with sera from persistently infected fish (A) and from control fish (B). All fish in both groups were bled at 60 days and 89 days after exposure of the persistently infected group to oncomiracidia. Oncomiracidia were incubated for 1 h at 25°C in 1:100 dilution of each serum. The affected oncomircidia stopped swimming gradually and began to form large aggregations within 1 h after starting the incubation. The proportion of non-motile oncomiracidia in each well of a culture plate was calculated as n1/n2×100%, where n1 is the number of non-motile oncomiracidia at 1 h after starting incubation and n2 is the total number of oncomiracidia.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Oncomiracidia of Heterobothrium okamotoi treated with serum from persistently infected fish bled at 89 days (A). The parasites were incubated for 1 h at 25°C in 1:100 dilution of the serum. The affected oncomiracidia stopped swimming gradually, shed their ciliated epidermal cells, and then the cilia became attached to each other to form aggregations within 1 h after starting the incubation. Oncomiracidium treated with serum from control fish (B). The oncomiracidia were not affected during the observation.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. ELISA values of sera from tiger puffer against each antigen of Heterobothrium okamotoi. (A) Values of sera from persistently infected fish against sonicated cilia of oncomiracidia. (B) Values of sera from control fish against sonicated cilia of oncomiracidia. (C) Values of sera from persistently infected fish against sonicated oncomiracidia. (D) Values of sera from control fish against sonicated oncomiracidia. (E) Values of sera from persistently infected fish against sonicated larvae. (F) Values of sera from control fish against sonicated larvae. (G) Values of sera from persistently infected fish against sonicated adults. (H) Values of sera from control fish against sonicated adults.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Infection level of Heteroboturium okamotoi of persistently infected fish (A) and control fish cohabitated with the persistently infected fish (B). Control group fish cohabitated with infected fish at 69 days after their exposure to oncomiracidia, and then they were exposed to H. okamotoi oncomiracidia at 70–74 days. Mean number of larvae was 43·9±68·1 and 109·0±96·2 for persistently infected group and control group, respectively; the mean number of parasites was significantly higher in the control group (P<0·05).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Agglutination activity of sera from tiger puffer against Heterobothrium okamotoi oncomiracidia. Oncomiracidia treated with sera from tiger puffer immunized with sonicated cilia of H. okamotoi, sonicated oncomiracidia, or BSA plus FCA. All fish were bled on 14 days, 44 days and 75 days after the booster immunization. Oncomiracidia were incubated for 1 h at 25°C in 1:100 dilution of each serum. The affected oncomircidia ceased to swim gradually and began to form large aggregations within 1 h after starting the incubation. The proportion of non-motile oncomiracidia in each well of a culture plate was calculated as n1/n2×100%, where n1 is the number of non-motile oncomiracidia at 1 h after starting incubation and n2 is the total number of oncomiracidia.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. ELISA values of sera from tiger puffer immunized with sonicated oncomiracidia or their cilia plus FCA or with BSA plus FCA against each antigen of Heterobothrium okamotoi. (A) Values of sera from fish immunized with BSA. (B) Values of mucus from fish immunized with BSA. (C) Values of sera from fish immunized with sonicated cilia. (D) Values of mucus from fish immunized with sonicated cilia. (E) Values of sera from fish immunized with sonicated oncomiracidia. (F) Values of mucus from fish immunized with sonicated oncomiracidia. All fish were bled at 14, 44 and 75 days after a booster immunization.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Infection level of Heterobothrium okamotoi on fish immunized with sonicated H. okamotoi oncomiracidia or sonicated cilia plus FCA, or with BSA plus FCA. Fish were exposed to H. okamotoi oncomiracidia at 54–58 days after a booster immunization. The parasite counts between fish groups showed no significant difference.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Immunoblot analyses of Heterobothrium okamotoi oncomiracidia from tiger puffer sera. Five μg of oncomiracidia were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 15–25% polyacrylamide gradient gels and were electro-blotted onto Pall Fluoro Trans W Membranes. Sera: lane 1, serum against BSA as a negative control; lane 2, serum against sonicated cilia of H. okamotoi oncomiracidia; lane 3, serum against sonicated H. okamotoi oncomiracidia: lane 4, serum from persistently infected fish for 89 days. The signal was developed with NBT-BSIP. Relative molecular masses of standard markers are indicated on the left. The position of the antigen is indicated with arrows on the right side of each panel.