Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T00:08:45.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of compaction parameters on the swelling kinetics of compacted Na-bentonite/quartz sand tablets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2026

Tara Leela Grace Kaur Love
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK
Catriona Sellick*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, UK
Coran Michael Hoskin
Affiliation:
Cambridge University: University of Cambridge, UK
Chris Greenwell
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK
Darren Gröcke
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK
*
Corresponding authors: Catriona Sellick; Email: catriona.sellick@durham.ac.uk; Chris Greenwell; Email: chris.greenwell@durham.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Short-term shale swelling during initial fluid contact remains poorly constrained despite its importance for wellbore stability during geotechnical drilling. Conventional linear swelling measurements provide limited insight into early-time swelling kinetics. We present data from a novel, high-resolution non-contact linear displacement apparatus to evaluate the effects of artificial shale tablet preparation variables. Bentonite and bentonite–quartz mixtures, representative of the major constituents of many shales, were tested using NaCl brine (0.5 and 2 M) and deionized water to induce clay swelling. Tablets varied in quartz content (0–30%) and grain size (125–250, 250–300 and >300 µm), compaction pressure (4 and 8 tonnes) and duration (5, 8 and 10 min). The results show that quartz content and salinity strongly influence short-term swelling kinetics. Notably, 2 M NaCl induced the highest initial swelling rate, further amplified by higher quartz content. These findings highlight the importance of considering both swelling and non-swelling components when evaluating short-term shale swelling behaviour.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Figure 0

Figure 1. A schematic of the lower wellbore. Drilling fluid is pumped through the drill string and exits the drill bit through its head to lubricate/cool itself, and the return flow transports rock cuttings to the surface, where they are separated out. Credit: Provided by C. Sellick.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematic for the process used during image analysis. (a) A 3D image of a quartz particle used in this study with measurement parameters. (b) The 3D image is converted to a 2D shape with the same perimeter as the particle. (c) The 2D image is converted into a circle with the same area, where the diameter is representative of the particle size.

Figure 2

Table 1. Mixtures of PWB and quartz used for the tests. For each pellet composition, the swelling tests were repeated with three grain sizes (125–250, 250–300 and >300 µm).Table 1 long description.

Figure 3

Table 2. Particles used to produce quartz–clay tablets to run swelling experiments and their associated sizes and shapes measured using the Morphologi G3 particle characterization system. Values refer to D90 values.Table 2 long description.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Schematic of (a) the N-CLDM, (b) the see-through plastic lid and (c) the sample holder with (1) sensor wires connecting to a computer with N-CLDM software, (2) a steel non-contact linear displacement sensor with thread, two nuts and a sensor at the base, (3) a target 1 mm steel disc placed on top of a pressed tablet and (4) a perforated metal sample support disc.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Plots illustrating the variation of the averaged initial swelling rate of the tablets under each set of experimental conditions (compaction pressure = 4 tonnes, compaction time = 5, 8 or 10 min, particle size = 125–250, 250–300 or >300 µm or bentonite only, quartz content = 0%, 10%, 20% or 30%, NaCl concentration = 0, 0.5 or 2 M). The shaded region around each line is the standard deviation of the tests.Figure 4 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Plots illustrating the variation of the averaged initial swelling rate of the tablets under each set of experimental conditions (compaction pressure = 8 tonnes, compaction time = 5, 8 or 10 min, particle size = 125–250, 250–300 or >300 µm or bentonite only, quartz content = 0%, 10%, 20% or 30%, NaCl concentration = 0, 0.5 or 2 M). The shaded region around each line is the standard deviation of the tests.Figure 5 long description.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Plots illustrating the variation of the averaged final swelling rate of the tablets under each set of experimental conditions (compaction pressure = 4 tonnes, compaction time = 5, 8 or 10 min, particle size = 125–250, 250–300 or >300 µm or bentonite only, quartz content = 0%, 10%, 20% or 30%, NaCl concentration = 0, 0.5 or 2 M). The shaded region around each line is the standard deviation of the tests.Figure 6 long description.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Plots illustrating the variation of the averaged final swelling rate of the tablets under each set of experimental conditions (compaction pressure = 8 tonnes, compaction time = 5, 8 or 10 min, particle size = 125–250, 250–300 or >300 µm or bentonite only, quartz content = 0%, 10%, 20% or 30%, NaCl concentration = 0, 0.5 or 2 M). The shaded region around each line is the standard deviation of the tests.Figure 7 long description.

Figure 9

Figure 8. (a) Photographs of a pure bentonite pellet compacted at 4 tonnes for 5 min, swollen with 0.5 M NaCl: (1) dry (bentonite) tablet and (2) the swelling after a short-term (30 min) displacement. (b) The physical swelling properties for individual quartz–clay tablets representative of all compaction times/pressures, with quartz content (%) plotted against deionized water and NaCl solutions (0.5 and 2 M). The dashed sections indicates a wet–dry boundary.Figure 8 long description.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Interaction plots showing the interactions between initial swelling rate (y-axis) and (a) quartz content (x-axis) and NaCl concentration (green line = 0 M, orange line = 0.5 M, light blue line = 2 M), (b) quartz content (x-axis) and compaction pressure (red line = 4 tonnes, blue line = 8 tonnes) and (c) compaction time (x-axis) and compaction pressure (red line = 4 tonnes, blue line = 8 tonnes).Figure 9 long description.

Supplementary material: File

Love et al. supplementary material 1

Love et al. supplementary material
Download Love et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 30.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Love et al. supplementary material 2

Love et al. supplementary material
Download Love et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 1.1 MB