Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T01:48:37.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deglaciation and weathering of Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Kevin Kiernan*
Affiliation:
School of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, TAS 7001, Australia
Damian B. Gore
Affiliation:
Department of Environment & Geography, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
David Fink
Affiliation:
Environment Division, ANSTO, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
Duanne A. White
Affiliation:
Department of Environment & Geography, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
Anne McConnell
Affiliation:
School of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, TAS 7001, Australia
Ingvar A. Sigurdsson
Affiliation:
South Iceland Nature Centre, Strandvegur 50, 900 Vestmannaeyjar, Iceland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In situ cosmogenic 10Be exposure dating, radiocarbon determinations, salt and sediment geochemistry, and rock weathering observations indicate that parts of Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica have been subaerially exposed throughout much of the last glacial cycle, with the last glaciation occurring prior to 100 ka bp. Salt-enhanced subaerial weathering, coupled with a paucity of glacial erratics, made exposure age dating challenging. Rapid subaerial surface lowering in some places means that some exposure ages may underestimate the true age of deglaciation. Despite this uncertainty, the data are consistent with the absence of overriding by a thick ice sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum ∼20–18 ka bp.

Information

Type
Earth Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Larsemann Hills, the distribution of types of salt minerals and the location of the “salt line”. The “salt line”, revealed by the salt (Supplementary Table III - see www.journals.org/jid_ANS), sediment chemistry (Supplementary Table IV - see www.journals.org/jid_ANS) and field observations of rock weathering, lies downwind of the marine inlets. The maximum monthly wind direction (over 59 months) is represented by an arrow; the error bar shows ± 1 SD.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Scenarios used to correct cosmogenic ages for subaerial erosion. Z = total erosion thickness, indicated by height difference between sampled surfaces and striated surfaces nearby, DG = deglaciation. (1–3) mark scenarios as described in text.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Conductivity (μS cm-1) of 1:5 sediment:water extracts from Stornes (left) and Broknes (right).

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Representative salt minerals. a. Top left: flowers of gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O). b. Top right: cubic crystals of halite (NaCl). c. Bottom left: amorphous gypsum nestled between cubic halite crystals. d. Bottom right: acicular thenardite (Na2SO4) with cubic halite. These samples are from Broknes, and the scale bar on each photomicrograph is 10 μm.

Figure 4

Table I Mumiyo 14C ages from the Three Man Peak area, Broknes.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Cosmogenic nuclide exposure ages ± 1 σ error. The quoted ages are for weathering scenario (1), which assumes that postglacial lowering has no effect on 10Be concentration. Numbers in brackets refer to the depth of postglacial weathering of the rock surface (in mm).

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Cosmogenic nuclide exposure ages (in ka) following correction for the amount of postglacial erosion as indicated by field relationships, and detailed in Fig. 5. Bold numbers refer to postglacial erosion for scenario (2), where erosion is constant following deglaciation. Numbers in italics are for scenario (3), where all erosion occurs just prior to the present day. N/D = not determined.

Figure 7

Table II AMS and 10Be results for Larsemann Hills bedrock samples.

Figure 8

Table III In situ cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages.

Supplementary material: File

Kiernan supplementary material

Tables.doc

Download Kiernan supplementary material(File)
File 213 KB