Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T08:05:21.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Invasive Smooth Cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) Eradication and Native Crab Recovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2018

Long Tang
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
Bo Li
Affiliation:
Professor, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Bin Zhao
Affiliation:
Professor, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Peng Li
Affiliation:
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China
Zhanbin Li
Affiliation:
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China
Yang Gao*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China
*
*Author for correspondence: Yang Gao, State Key Laboratory Base of Eco-Hydraulic Engineering in Arid Area, Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, No.5 South Jinhua Road, Xi’an, China. (Email: gaoyang@xaut.edu.cn)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Invasive smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora Loisel) eradication is important for the health of many coastal ecosystems. An integrated regime of continuous submergence after clear mowing, with three interval levels between mowing and submergence (5, 10, and 15 d) and three submergence depths (20, 30, and 50 cm), was implemented in cofferdams enclosing invader populations along a Chinese coast. In July of the following year, after the roots of mowed S. alterniflora had been submerged for 12 mo, some ramets grew under the regime with an interval of 15 d and the regime with a submergence depth of 20 cm, but no ramets occurred under the regimes with submergence depths of 30 or 50 cm and intervals of 5 or 10 d. Four crab species were documented: Helice tridens tientsinensis Rathbun, Sesarma dehaani H. Milne-Edwards, Ocypode stimpsoni Ortmann, and Chiromantes haematocheir de Haan. Biomass and abundance values of crab species in the cofferdams were similar to those in the mudflats but different from those in smooth cordgrass populations. Thus, the treatment of submergence after mowing, which was implemented in the cofferdams, can control S. alterniflora and provide a mudflat-like habitat that promotes crab recovery if this treatment uses the proper combination of submergence depth and interval between mowing and submergence.

Information

Type
Case Study
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Diagram of the experimental area and the cofferdam construction locations in Dongtan marsh.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Experimental processes: A, cofferdams; B, experimental units; C, Spartina alterniflora eradication and gradual collapse of cofferdams.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Schematic representation of the experimental layout in the study area. Submergence depths (D): D20, 20 cm; D30, 30 cm; D50, 50 cm. Interval between submergence and mowing (T): T5, 5 d; T10, 10 d; T15, 15 d. , Experimental unit in cofferdam, , reservoir created by digging the mud to build the cofferdams; , earth dam; , mowing quadrats; , control quadrats.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Effects of mowing and the integrated regime of continuous submergence after clear mowing (i.e., ecological engineering) on the density of Spartina alterniflora. Vertical bars indicate standard errors. The letters above the columns denote significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test, 5% significance level).

Figure 4

Figure 5 Effects of submergence depth and interval between mowing and submergence on the density of Spartina alterniflora. Vertical bars indicate standard errors of three replicates. Capital letters denote significant differences among submergence-depth groups; lowercase letters denote significant differences among interval groups (Friedman’s two-way analysis for submergence depth and interval, 5% significance level).

Figure 5

Figure 6 Differences in crab abundance among invader Spartina alterniflora populations, areas within the cofferdams (i.e., ecological engineering), and mudflats. The letters above the columns denote significant differences. Vertical bars indicate standard errors (Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test, 5% significance level).

Figure 6

Figure 7 Differences in crab biomass among invader Spartina alterniflora populations, cofferdams (i.e., ecological engineering), and mudflats. The letters above the columns denote significant differences. Vertical bars indicate standard errors (Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test, 5% significance level).

Figure 7

Table 1 Summary of Friedman’s two-way analysis for the effect of habitat and crab species on the biomass and the abundance of captured crabs.

Figure 8

Table 2 Summary of Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test on the difference in biomass and abundance of crab species among Spartina alterniflora populations, areas within the cofferdams (ecological engineering), and mudflats.