Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:27:14.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of borehole inclinometry in determining basal sliding and internal deformation at Haut Glacier d’Arolla, Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Luke Copland
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A.
Jon Harbor
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A.
Marie Minner
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A.
Martin Sharp
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of boreholes were drilled with high-pressure hot water across a section of Haut Glacier d’Arolla, Switzerland, in summer 1995. Twenty-three of the boreholes were profiled with a digital inclinometer soon aller drilling, and 14 were re-profiled up to 6 weeks later to determine changes in the longitudinal shape of boreholes with time. In addition to the main surveys, three boreholes were surveyed 14 times each to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of inclinometry measurements. These repeat surveys suggest that caution is needed in the interpretation of short-term borehole displacement measurements, and that the reoccupation of boreholes from one year to the next may be a better way to determine patterns of internal deformation and basal sliding. The annual scale may also have advantages in providing more long-term insight into glaciological processes than short term (single season) measurements.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997 
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Map of Haut Glacier d’Arolla, Switzerland. The borehole array was located towards the eastern margin of the glacier, approximately 1.5 km from the terminus.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Cross-section of Haut Glacier d’Arolla, showing location of boreholes profiled with the inclinometer in summer 1995. The numbers signify borehole location.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.(a) Mean profiles of borehole 95 / 2 on 4 and 22 August 1995. Borehole orientation is divided into north–south and east–west components (north and east are positive, south and west are negative). Solid lines show the original borehole profile, and dotted lines show the later profile. Note the difference in scale between the horizontal and vertical axes. (b) Displacement direction of borehole 95 / 2 between 4 and 22 August 1995. 0° is pointing north, with positive and negative angles referring to displacements to the east and west of north, respectively, (c) Comparison of the measured displacement with depth of borehole, 95 / 2 between 4 and 22 August 1995, and the pattern of ice deformation with depth predicted by Glen’s flow law.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.(a) Mean profiles of borehole 95 / 15 on 5 and 23 August 1995. Solid lines show the original borehole profile, and dotted lines show the later profile, (b) Displacement direction of borehole 95 / 15 between 5 and 23 August 1995. 0° is pointing north, with positive and negative angles referring to displacements to the east and west of north, respectively, (c) Comparison of the measured displacement with depth of borehole 95 / 15 between 5 and 23 August 1995, and the pattern of ice deformation with depth predicted by Glen’s flow law.

Figure 4

Fig. 5.(a) The 14 profiles of borehole 95 / 25 used to check the accuracy and reproducibility to the inclinometry measurements. Note the marked increase in scatter of the measurements at locations where the borehole changes orientation. (b) Scatter of the measurement points around the arithmetic mean at one-third of the depth of borehole 95 / 25. (d) Scatter of the measurement points around the arithmetic mean at two-thirds of the depth of borehole 95 / 25. (d) Scatter of the measurement points around the arithmetic mean at the base of borehole 95 / 25.

Figure 5

Table. 1Average deviation of the inclinometry measurements from the mean profile in the boreholes in which repeat measurements were made. The mean profile was calculated as a simple arithmetic mean of all 14 repeat measurements. The north–south and east–west components of the total deviation are provided, together with the average deviations expressed as a percentage of the measurement depth