Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T05:06:52.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quasi-self-complementary ultra-wideband antenna with band rejection characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2018

Rajarshi Sanyal*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, M.C.K.V Institute of Engineering, Howrah, West Bengal, India
Partha Pratim Sarkar
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering and Technological Studies (DETS), University of Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
Santosh Kumar Chowdhury
Affiliation:
IEEE, West Bengal, India
*
Corresponding author: Rajarshi Sanyal Email: rajarshi.sanyal1972@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a compact novel quasi-self-complementary semi-octagonal-shaped antenna for ultra-wideband (UWB) application. The proposed novel structure is fed by a microstrip line where different rectangular truncation is etched to the ground plane as an impedance matching element, which results for much wider impedance bandwidth (VSWR<2) from 2.9 to 20 GHz. In order to obtain band-notched characteristics at 5.5 GHz, an open-ended, quarter wavelength, spiral-shaped stub is introduced in the vicinity of the truncated part of the ground plane. An equivalent circuit model is adopted to investigate the band rejection characteristics of the ground plane stub. Sharpness of the rejection band can be controlled by maintaining the gap between stub resonator and the slotted periphery of ground plane. The proposed antenna design is validated by experimental measurements.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Design steps of proposed quasi-self-complementary semi-octagonal UWB antenna.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Geometry and dimension of the proposed band-notched quasi-self-complementary UWB antenna.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Equivalent circuit model of the proposed band-notched UWB antenna, (b) simulated impedance (real part), (c) simulated impedance (imaginary part).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. VSWR against frequency for the four antennas shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. VSWR against frequency for different values of W3.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. VSWR against frequency for different values of W1.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. VSWR against frequency for different values of L2.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. VSWR against frequency for different values of W2.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. VSWR against frequency for different values of Ln.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Simulated surface current distribution for the proposed band-notched UWB antenna on the ground plane at (a) 3.5 GHz, (b) 5.5 GHz, (c) 9 GHz, (d) 14.5 GHz.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Fabricated structure of (a) proposed UWB antenna, (b) proposed band-notched UWB antenna.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Simulated and measured VSWR of (a) proposed UWB antenna, (b) proposed band-notched UWB antenna.

Figure 12

Table 1. Optimized parameter value of the proposed antenna shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Measured radiation patterns: (a) E-plane, (b) H-plane.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Measured gain of the proposed band-notched UWB antenna.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Group delay of the proposed band-notched UWB antenna: (a) face-to-face, (b) side-by-side.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. (a) Transmitting antenna input, and received far-field signals by virtual probes for ϕ = 90° and varying θ in the E-plane: (b) θ = 0°, (c) θ = 45°, (d) θ = 90°.