Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:01:26.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RETHINKING THE ANCESTRAL SHRINES IN THE EARLY EMPIRES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2022

Tian Tian
Affiliation:
Tian Tian, 田天, Peking University; email: tiant@pku.edu.cn
Zhou Wen
Affiliation:
translated by Zhou Wen 周雯.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the development of early imperial ancestral shrines by exploring the Liye and Yuelu 嶽麓 Qin slips, along with other excavated texts and historical documents. It argues that Qin Shihuang's 秦始皇 court was the first to specify the regulations for the early imperial ancestral shrine, a crucial part of which was the establishment of the Taishang huang 太上皇 shrines throughout the realm, making the imperial ancestral cult part of the daily local administrative affairs. The Western Han courts largely adopted the regulations stipulated by Qin Shihuang in their commandery and kingdom shrines until late Western Han, when ritual reforms brought the imperial ancestral shrines closer to what Michael Loewe calls the Reformist vision, entailing potential conflicts between bloodlines and the hereditary order of succession. By no means did the early empires simply continue in the stipulations for the imperial ancestral shrines the royal practices of the pre-imperial period; instead, the precedents transmitted to Eastern Han reflected two major ritual reforms, with local ancestral shrines and personal participation by the emperor key subjects of debates.

提要

提要

本文探討里耶、嶽麓秦簡與其它出土、傳世文獻,重述早期帝國宗廟的發展歷程。本文認為,秦始皇創立了帝國宗廟制度,其中重要的部分之一是在縣級行政區劃設立太上皇廟,使宗廟祭祀成為地方日常行政的一部分。西漢時代的郡國廟制度承自秦始皇。西漢晚期的宗廟改革,使帝國的宗廟制度更近於儒家禮制的規定,也將血緣關係與繼承關係的衝突帶回宗廟制度中。文章結論,早期帝國的宗廟制度並非前帝國時代的延續,而是經歷了兩次變革才變為東漢以後的形態,地方宗廟與皇帝親祭即其中的核心問題。

Information

Type
Festschrift in Honor of Michael Loewe on his 100th Birthday
Information
Early China , Volume 45 , September 2022 , pp. 167 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for the Study of Early China