Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T01:16:34.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field emission from laser cut CNT fibers and films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2013

Steven B. Fairchild
Affiliation:
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433
John S. Bulmer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FS
Martin Sparkes
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FS
John Boeckl*
Affiliation:
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433
Marc Cahay
Affiliation:
Spintronics and Vacuum Nanoelectronics Laboratory, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Ohio 45221
Tyson Back
Affiliation:
Research Institute, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio 45469-0170
P. Terrence Murray*
Affiliation:
Research Institute, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio 45469-0170
Gregg Gruen
Affiliation:
TechFlow Scientific, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110
Matthew Lange
Affiliation:
TechFlow Scientific, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110
Nathaniel P. Lockwood
Affiliation:
Directed Energy Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico 87117
Francisco Orozco
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FS
William O’Neill
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FS
Catharina Paukner
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FS
Krzysztof K. K. Koziol
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FS
*
b) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: Paul.murray@udri.udayton.edu

Abstract

Field emission (FE) measurements are reported from carbon nanotube (CNT) fibers and laser-patterned free standing films fabricated by direct online condensation from a floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition reactor. Fiber and film cathodes showed stable emission in the 1–2 mA current (I) range at maximum cathode temperatures less than 1000 °C; film cathodes show localized heating at the triangular tips and higher maximum temperatures than the fibers. Fowler–Nordheim (FN) analysis indicated a change in the morphology of the emitters with increasing external electrical field (E ext). Fiber cathode I–E ext data are interpreted as FN emission from the fiber tip which is eventually limited by space-charge effects. At higher E ext, FN emission from the fiber sidewall occurs. The single fiber cathode stopped emitting abruptly when field induced self-heating effects became significant. For CNT films, self-heating effects can destroy a portion of the film, but FE can still occur from other areas.

Information

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

TABLE I. The maximum observed current, current density, and applied voltage from the literature as well as results reported here are included. The listed recent results represent what one would expect from a variety of experimental approaches with CNT field emitters. All experiments were run in dc mode and represent conditions for the maximum observable current. Although direct comparisons are difficult to make given the subtle differences between experiments, this work compares reasonably well with previously reported results of fibers, arrays, and films.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. (a) Raman spectrum of the CNT film made by direct online condensation by floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition. The Raman spectrum indicated here has a G:D ratio of 96, indicating a high degree of graphitic crystallinity. The prominent RBM peaks near 150 cm−1 indicate the presence of single-walled CNTs. (b) SEM image of a CNT film showing alignment of CNT bundles within the fiber.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. (a) SEM image of a CNT fiber was cut by the fs laser. The fiber diameter is approximately 30 μm. (b) Mechanically cut fiber with an uneven tip due to cutting with a razor blade.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. CNT films cut with the ns laser. (a) Triangle pattern consisting of 1 mm × 0.5 mm triangles separated by 0.5 mm. (b) Straight cut CNT film.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. (a) Current versus time curve for an fs laser cut CNT fiber cathode at A–K gap distances of 1.0 and 1.5 mm. The voltage was ramped from 0 to 1000 V and held there for 10,000 s before ramping down. (b) Optical and (c) IR images of the fiber inside the FE chamber during FE. The maximum temperature at 1.13 mA was 570 °C.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. (a) Current versus time curve for a single triangle cut CNT film cathode at A–K gap distance of 1.5 mm. The voltage was ramped from 0 to 1000 V and held there for 4000 s before ramping down. (b) IR image of the triangle cut CNT film inside the FE chamber during FE. Dashed lines are used to highlight the edges of the triangle cuts. The maximum temperature was 830 °C while emitting 2 mA.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. Comparison of I–V curves for straight cut and triangle cut CNT film cathodes for an A–K gap of 1.5 mm. The maximum current is 0.90 mA for the straight cut and 2.02 mA for the triangle cut due to the field enhancement provided by the triangle pattern.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. (a) SEM image of three CNT films stacked together. (b) Optical image of a stacked film cathode inside the FE chamber shows glowing at the triangle tips while emitting 1.2 mA.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. Comparison of I–V curves for two film and four film cathodes, both made from triangle-patterned CNT films. The A–K gap was 0.75 mm. The maximum currents before failure were 4.9 mA for the two-film cathode and 8.5 mA for the four-film cathode.

Figure 9

FIG. 9. (a) Current versus applied electric field of a laser cut fiber of 40 µm diameter for different values of the A–K gap distance indicated next to each curve. The dashed line is a FN fit to the I–-E data for a gap distance of 2 mm. (b) Incremental change of partial pressure of H2 compared to the background pressure as a function of applied electric field for the two values of the anode to cathode spacing shown in Fig. 9(a).

Figure 10

FIG. 10. (a) I (amps)–electric field (V/μm) characteristics of a triangle cut CNT film for different anode to cathode gap distances. A good agreement with FN behavior is found over the range of the electric field of [0.5–0.65] and [0.81–1.0] V/μm. (b) RGA showing increase in partial pressure (Torr) of H2 versus electric field (V/microns) during FE from a triangle cut CNT film for different anode to cathode gap distances.