Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T18:22:50.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vegetation Change in Southwestern Amazonia (Brazil) and Relationship to the Late Pleistocene and Holocene Climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2017

Dilce F Rossetti*
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Observação da Terra. São José dos Campos 12245-970- SP, Brazil
Marcelo C L Cohen
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Pará, Centro de Geociências. Belém 66075-900-PA, Brazil
Luiz C R Pessenda
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo, Laboratório de Carbon-14. Piracicaba 13416-000-SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: rossetti@dsr.inpe.br.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Late Quaternary climate in Amazonia is an issue still open to debate, with hypotheses varying from alternate dry and wet episodes to stable climate with undisturbed rainforest. We approach this question using δ13C, C/N, and, to a lesser extent, δ15N from deposits derived from four cores, with the results combined with published pollen data from two of these cores. These data were analyzed within the context of radiocarbon dating, which revealed ages ranging from 42.8–41.8 to 2.3–2.2 cal ka BP. Fluvial channel and floodplain deposits with freshwater phytoplankton recorded a trend of wet climate with dry episodes before ~40 cal ka BP, followed by humid and cold climate until the Last Glacial Maximum, with intensified aridity towards the end of the Late Pleistocene. Peaks of increased contributions in C4 land plants in the mid- to late Holocene were not synchronous and have no correspondence with Amazonian Holocene dry episodes, being due to sedimentary processes related to fluvial dynamics during the establishment of herbaceous fields on abandoned depositional sites. Thus, the climate remained wet in the Holocene, which would have favored the expansion of the Amazonian rainforest as we see today.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2017 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 
Figure 0

Figure 1 (a,b) Location of the study area between Porto Velho and Humaitá, southwestern Amazonia, Brazil (a), with indication of main river systems and tectonic lineaments (b). (c) Study area with location of fluvial terraces and the four studied cores (modified from Rossetti et al. 2014). (d) Main vegetation types in the study area. Inner box indicates the study area shown in Figure 1c.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Geomorphological context of the studied cores. (a) Core 1 located in a primarily seasonally flooded area (now anthropogenically-modified nonforested area) located in the lowest fluvial terrace of the Madeira River (QuickBird image, Image 2007–Digital Globe). (b) DEM–SRTM locating two large savanna patches over an intermediate terrace of the Madeira River, where cores 2 and 3 were plotted. Note that the first core occurs in a large savanna area corresponding to a floodplain paleoenvironment, and the second one in a savanna area developed over a paleomeander. (c,d) Landsat (c) and QuickBird image (Image 2007–Digital Globe) (d) with detailed view of the paleomorphology and floristic composition in the areas corresponding to cores 2 and 3. Note in (c) the semi-circular shape with several concentric lines corresponding to a paleomeander in sharp contact (hatched line) with its associated paleofloodplain. Note also the sharp contrasts between savanna (pink) and forest (green) (colors correspond to the online color version of the article); (e) Detail of the site of core 3, acquired also over a paleomeander displaying several concentric lines representative of channel migration through time (QuickBird image, Image 2007–Digital Globe). (f) DEM–SRTM illustrating the place where core 4 was acquired. Note that this core was plotted over a large, elongated belt of savanna, which highlights a southward trending paleodrainage system. (g) Detailed view of site 4, illustrating the floristic types (QuickBird image, Image 2007-Digital Globe).

Figure 2

Figure 3 Litostratigraphic profile of core 1, with the vertical distribution of sedimentary facies, depositional environments, ages, δ13C, δ15N, and C/N. Note that ages are cal (ka) BP.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Litostratigraphic profile of core 2, with the vertical distribution of sedimentary facies, depositional environments, ages, δ13C, δ15N, and C/N. Note that ages are cal (ka) BP.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Litostratigraphic profile of core 3, with the vertical distribution of sedimentary facies, depositional environments, ages, δ13C, δ15N, and C/N. Note that ages are cal (ka) BP.

Figure 5

Figure 6 Litostratigraphic profile of core 4, with the vertical distribution of sedimentary facies, depositional environments, ages, δ13C, δ15N, and C/N. Note that ages are cal (ka) BP.

Figure 6

Table 1 Radiocarbon ages of the studied deposits.

Figure 7

Figure 7 Types of organic matter preserved in the sedimentary deposits of the study area, contrasted to the history of global ice fluctuation since near the last glacial episode (i.e. ~60 ka ago) [see text for discussion; curve of global ice after Crowley and North (1991); δ18O stages from Emiliani (1955) and Shackleton (1969); ages are in cal yr BP; figure modified from Rossetti et al. (2014)].

Supplementary material: File

Rossetti supplementary material

Rossetti supplementary material 1

Download Rossetti supplementary material(File)
File 44.4 KB