Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T22:41:45.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soft matter and nanomaterials characterization by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2019

John Watt
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA; watt@lanl.gov
Dale L. Huber
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Sandia National Laboratories, USA; dale.huber@sandia.gov
Phoebe L. Stewart
Affiliation:
Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology, Case Western Reserve University, USA; PLS47@case.edu

Abstract

Soft matter has historically been an unlikely candidate for investigation by electron microscopy techniques due to damage by the electron beam as well as inherent instability under a high vacuum environment. Characterization of soft matter has often relied on ensemble-scattering techniques. The recent development of cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) provides the soft matter community with an exciting opportunity to probe the structure of soft materials in real space. Cryo-TEM reduces beam damage and allows for characterization in a native, frozen-hydrated state, providing direct visual representation of soft structure. This article reviews cryo-TEM in soft materials characterization and illustrates how it has provided unique insights not possible by traditional ensemble techniques. Soft matter systems that have benefited from the use of cryo-TEM include biological-based “soft” nanoparticles (e.g., viruses and conjugates), synthetic polymers, supramolecular materials as well as the organic–inorganic interface of colloidal nanoparticles. Many challenges remain, such as combining structural and chemical analyses; however, the opportunity for soft matter research to leverage newly developed cryo-TEM techniques continues to excite.

Information

Type
Cryogenic Electron Microscopy in Materials Science
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Examples of cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) single-particle reconstruction applied to soft nanoparticles. (a) Cryo-TEM reconstruction of the viral–polymer conjugate Qβ−PNB (poly(norbornene−(oligo(ethylene glycol) ester))). Note: blue, virion density; red, polymer.13 (b) Cryo-TEM reconstruction of a polyhedral wireframe DNA nanoparticle with a designed octahedral shape. Reprinted with permission from Reference 14. © 2019 American Chemical Society. Scale bars = 5 nm.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Examples of cryo-electron tomography applied to soft nanoparticles. (a) (Left) Section of a serum albumin-coated tobacco mosaic virus particle taken from a tomogram. The superimposed blue cylinder (300 nm × 18 nm) represents the filamentous tobacco mosaic virus particle and the red density represents the flexibly attached serum albumin protein. (Right) The cross-sectional segment illustrates docking of the human serum albumin crystal structure. Scale bar = 25 nm.15 (b) Portion of a tomogram of the liquid-crystal region inside a cubosome (dispersed cubic liquid-crystalline phase particle). Red arrows show nodes within the water network. Scale bar = 16 nm. (c) Side view of the cubosome tomogram. The red and blue arrows indicate two interdependent channel networks. The average hole diameter is ∼5 nm. (b, c) Reprinted with permission from Reference 16. © 2015 Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Evolution of electron microscopy of soft matter systems. (a) Scanning electron microscopy micrograph of a phase-separated diblock copolymer obtained in 1966. Reprinted with permission from Reference 17. © 1966 Wiley. Scale bar = 1 μm. (b) Transmission electron microcopy (TEM) micrograph of the 3D phase separation of a block copolymer published in 1988. Reprinted with permission from Reference 19. © 1988 Nature Publishing Group. (c) Cryogenic-TEM image of a polymer micelle in water. (d) Reconstructed tomogram of the same micelle. Reprinted with permission from Reference 21. © 2014 American Chemical Society. Scale bars = 50 nm.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Comparison of (a, b) conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and (c) cryogenic (cryo)-TEM characterization of hairy hybrid Janus catalyst made from silica-poly(acrylic acid)-polystyrene (PAA-PS) particles with selectively immobilized Ag nanoparticles on the poly(acrylic acid) shell hydrophilic face. Reprinted with permission from Reference 28. (d) High-angle annular dark-field cryo-scanning transmission electron microscope image of a mixture of CeO2, Fe2O3, and ZnO nanoparticles in a vitrified suspension. (e) Combined energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometry maps of Fe Kα (red), Zn Kα (blue), Ce Lα (yellow), and C Kα (green). Reprinted with permission from Reference 29. © 2019 Micron. Note: NPs, nanoparticles.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Cryo-electron tomography analysis of an intermediate branched worm structure with protruding tentacles made from in situ self-assembled diblock copolymer (poly(ethylene oxide) methyl ether methacrylate12-co-styrene)-b-(n-butyl methacrylate-co-styrene) on the surface of colloidal silica particles. (a) Cryogenic transmission electron microscope image showing a 2D projection of the selected particle. (b) Selected slices from the reconstructed tomogram of the blue rectangular area selected in (a). (c) Isosurface of the reconstructed tomogram rendered in (i) top, (ii) front, and (iii) 45° views, respectively. Scale bars = 200 nm. Reprinted with permission from Reference 34. © 2017 American Chemical Society.