Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:54:02.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tri-band dual circularly polarized planar antenna with defective ground structure for wireless applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2015

B. Rama Sanjeeva Reddy*
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, India. Phone: +91 944 097 47 34
D. Vakula
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, India. Phone: +91 944 097 47 34
*
Corresponding author: B. Rama Sanjeeva Reddy Email: sanjeev.antenna@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A novel tri-band asymmetric slot with defective ground structure (DGS) microstrip antenna for dual circular polarization (CP) is proposed. By placing a slot with 45° across diagonally at the center of the patch, excites resonant bands with narrow bandwidth and dual CP operation. The main design challenge is to introduce optimized defected element of circular dumbbell shape to enhance the impedance bandwidth with frequency shift operation at all bands. DGS enabled antenna is practically fabricated and simulated. Antenna is compact in size and shows a good quality of CP at two resonant bands and linearly polarized at one band. Structure displays the impedance bandwidth of 8% (2.26–2.45 GHz), 5.45% (3.41–3.6 GHz) and 3.07% (5.12–5.28 GHz). The design also shows 40 and 11 MHz, 3-dB axial ratio bandwidth at lower and middle bands, respectively. Simulated gain for each band is 4.72, 6.2 and 4 dB. Performance of antenna with and without DGS is also studied and compared. This single probe feed proposed antenna remains consistent with good radiation patterns and sufficient antenna gain over the operating bands. Excellent agreement was obtained between measurements and simulations.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Top view of the proposed antenna geometry.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Bottom view of the proposed antenna geometry.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Design evolution of the proposed antennas 1–4.

Figure 3

Table 1. Dimensions of the optimized antenna design.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Simulated return loss for Antenna 1–4 evolved structures.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Simulated gain response for Antenna 1–4 evolved structures.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Measured and simulated AR of Antenna4.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Fabricated Antenna: (a) top view, (b) bottom view, and (c) response from network analyzer.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Measured and simulated return loss of Antenna4 (with DGS).

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Measured and simulated gain of Antenna4 (with DGS).

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Average and vector current distributions at (a) 2.4 GHz, (b) 3.56 GHz, and (c) 5.28 GHz.

Figure 11

Table 2. Calculated bandwidth and gain parameters of the slot loaded antenna types.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Measured radiation patterns at (a) 2.4 GHz, (b) 3.56 GHz, and (c) 5.28 GHz (represented in the x–y E-plane).

Figure 13

Table 3. Summary of the simulated and measured parameters.