Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T17:53:14.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modulation of leukocytic populations of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) by the intestinal parasite Enteromyxum leei (Myxozoa: Myxosporea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2013

ITZIAR ESTENSORO*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Acuicultura Torre de la Sal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IATS-CSIC), 12595 Ribera de Cabanes, Castellón, Spain
IVÁN MULERO
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia (UM), 30100 Murcia, Spain
MARÍA J. REDONDO
Affiliation:
Instituto de Acuicultura Torre de la Sal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IATS-CSIC), 12595 Ribera de Cabanes, Castellón, Spain
PILAR ÁLVAREZ-PELLITERO
Affiliation:
Instituto de Acuicultura Torre de la Sal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IATS-CSIC), 12595 Ribera de Cabanes, Castellón, Spain
VICTORIANO MULERO
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia (UM), 30100 Murcia, Spain
ARIADNA SITJÀ-BOBADILLA
Affiliation:
Instituto de Acuicultura Torre de la Sal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IATS-CSIC), 12595 Ribera de Cabanes, Castellón, Spain
*
* Corresponding author: Instituto de Acuicultura Torre de la Sal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IATS-CSIC), 12595 Ribera de Cabanes, Castellón, Spain. E-mail: itziar.estensoro@csic.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The cellular mucosal and systemic effectors of gilthead sea bream (GSB) (Sparus aurata) involved in the acute immune response to the intestinal parasite Enteromyxum leei were studied in fish experimentally infected by the anal route. In the intestinal inflammatory infiltrates and in lymphohaematopoietic organs (head kidney and spleen) of parasitized fish, the number of plasma cells, B cells (IgM immunoreactive) and mast cells (histamine immunoreactive) were significantly higher, whereas the number of acidophilic granulocytes (G7 immunoreactive) decreased, compared with non-parasitized and unexposed fish. These differences were stronger at the posterior intestine, the main target of the parasite, and no differences were found in the thymus. In non-parasitized GSB, the percentage of splenic surface occupied by melanomacrophage centres was significantly higher. These results suggest that the cellular response of GSB to E. leei includes proliferation of leukocytes in lymphohaematopoietic organs and recruitment into intestines via blood circulation involving elements of innate and adaptive immunity. Acidophilic granulocytes and mast cells presented opposite patterns of response to the parasite infection, with an overall depletion of the former and an increased amount of the latter. Some differences between both cell types were also detected in regard to their granule density and cell morphology.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1. Antibodies used for the detection of gilthead sea bream (GSB) leukocytes in histological sections

Figure 1

Table 2. Enteromyxum leei infection in experimentally infected gilthead sea bream. Prevalence of infection (%) (PI) and mean intensity of infection (MI) are given for the three intestinal histological sections. Sample sizes for the control, unexposed (C), for the exposed, non-parasitized (NON-PAR) and for the parasitized (PAR) groups are given. Anterior intestine (Ant); Middle intestine (Mid); Posterior intestine (Post)

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Granulocyte heterogeneity in infected gilthead sea bream tissue sections: histochemistry (A: haematoxylin & eosin, B–J: Giemsa) and anti-histamine immunohistochemistry (K–L: haematoxylin). Enteromyxum leei stages are indicated by asterisks. (A, B) Eosinophil/acidophil granulocytes in the posterior intestine (Pi). (C) Abundant, large eosinophil/acidophil granulocytes (arrow) and scarce, small eosinophil/acidophil granulocytes (arrow) in lamina propria-submucosa of Pi. Note the diffuse granule content in large ones and the densely packed granules in the small ones. (D) Small eosinophil/acidophil granulocytes in infected Pi. Note their abundance in the lamina propria-submucosa (arrowheads) and some infiltration in the epithelium (arrow). (E) Degranulation (arrow) into a proliferative parasite stage with numerous secondary daughter cells in the Pi. Small eosinophil/acidophil granulocytes (arrowheads) are infiltrated in the epithelium. (F) Eosinophil/acidophil granules surrounding an epithelial parasite stage in the Pi. (G) Head kidney parenchyma with numerous large eosinophil/acidophil granulocytes. (H) One small eosinophil/acidophil granulocyte close to a blood vessel in head kidney. (I) Two eosinophil/acidophil granulocytes in the thymus. (J) Scarce eosinophil/acidophil granulocytes in the splenic parenchyma showing different granule densities: disperse granules (arrow), dense granules (arrowhead). (K) Large histamine IRCs in the lamina propria-submucosa of the anterior intestine. (L) Small histamine IRCs in the lamina propria-submucosa of Pi. Scale bars = 5 μm.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Leukocyte immunohistochemistry of gilthead sea bream intestinal sections counterstained with haematoxylin. Anterior intestine (A–F) and posterior intestine (G–L) sections of control, unexposed fish (A–C and G–I) and of Enteromyxum leei-exposed fish (D–F and J–L) were immunolabelled with the anti-IgM polyclonal antibody (Pab), with the anti-G7 monoclonal antibody or with the anti-histamine (anti-HIS) polyclonal antibody, which detect plasma cells/B cells, acidophilic granulocytes and mast cells, respectively. Scale bars = 20 μm.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Leukocyte immunohistochemistry of gilthead sea bream sections of lymphohaematopoietic organs counterstained with haematoxylin. Head kidney (A–F) and spleen (G–L) sections of control, unexposed fish (A–C and G–I) and of Enteromyxum leei-exposed fish (D–F and J–L) were immunolabelled with the anti-IgM polyclonal antibody (Pab), with the anti-G7 monoclonal antibody or with the anti-histamine (anti-HIS) polyclonal antibody, which detect plasma cells/B cells, acidophilic granulocytes and mast cells, respectively. Note the presence of immunoreactive cells in and around blood vessels (*). Scale bars = 20 μm.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Mean+s.e.m. of IgM immunoreactive cells (IRCs) in tissue sections of recipient (R) and control (C) gilthead sea bream at two sampling times: t1, 15 days post Enteromyxum leei intubation (dpi) and t2, 40 dpi. Pooled Ai data of t1 and t2 for C and R fish, respectively, are represented in the inset. For each tissue, letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0·05) between groups. Anterior intestine (Ai), posterior intestine (Pi), head kidney (Hk), spleen (Sp), thymus (Th).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Mean+s.e.m. of G7 immunoreactive cells (IRCs) (A) or immunoreactive surface (B) in tissue sections of recipient (R) and control (C) gilthead sea bream at two sampling times: t1, 15 days post Enteromyxum leei intubation (dpi) and t2, 40 dpi. Pooled Ai data of t1 and t2 for C and R fish, respectively, are represented in the inset. For each tissue, letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0·05) between groups. Anterior intestine (Ai), posterior intestine (Pi), head kidney (Hk), spleen (Sp), thymus (Th).

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Mean+s.e.m. of histamine (HIS) immunoreactive cells (IRCs) in tissue sections of recipient (R) and control (C) gilthead sea bream at two sampling times: t1, 15 days post Enteromyxum leei intubation (dpi) and t2, 40 dpi. (A) Pooled Ai data of t1 and t2 for C and R fish, respectively, are represented in the inset. Anterior intestine (Ai), posterior intestine (Pi), head kidney (Hk), spleen (Sp), thymus (Th); (B) HIS-IRC types by their size at the Pi. For each tissue and cell type, letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0·05) between groups.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Mean+s.e.m. of melanomacrophage centres (MMCs) in splenic sections of recipient (R) and control (C) gilthead sea bream at two sampling times: t1, 15 days post Enteromyxum leei intubation (dpi) and t2, 40 dpi. (A) MMC size in μm2; (B) Average count of splenic MMCs per mm2; (C) Percentage of splenic surface occupied by MMCs. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P<0·05) between groups.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Mean+s.e.m. of immunoreactive cells (IRCs) (acidophilic granulocytes (AG), plasma cells and B cells (PC/BC) and mast cells (MC)) in intestinal sections of control (C) unexposed gilthead sea bream and recipient gilthead sea bream inoculated with Enteromyxum leei. Data of anterior and posterior intestines of two samplings (15 and 40 days post intubation) are pooled and recipient fish, split into parasitized (PAR) and non-parasitized (NON-PAR) intestinal segments. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (P<0·05).

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Mean+s.e.m. of melanomacrophage centres (MMCs) in splenic sections of control (C) and recipient gilthead sea bream inoculated with Enteromyxum leei. Data of two samplings (15 and 40 days post inoculum) are pooled and recipient fish, split into parasitized (PAR) and non-parasitized (NON-PAR) fish at the posterior intestine. (A) MMC size in μm2; (B) Average count of splenic MMCs per mm2; (C) Percentage of splenic surface occupied by MMCs. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (P<0·05).

Supplementary material: Image

Estensoro et al. Supplementary Material

Figure

Download Estensoro et al. Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 63.3 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Estensoro et al. Supplementary Material

Figure

Download Estensoro et al. Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 4.1 MB