The petitioners sought a faculty for the installation of a stained-glass window. There would be no loss of historic fabric and the Diocesan Advisory Committee recommended the proposal, but two parishioners objected to the design. In granting the faculty, the court emphasised that it was not a guardian of taste, provided that the legal framework for change was properly followed and that the presumption against change was discharged. In the court's assessment the balance under the Duffield questions came down very firmly in favour of granting a faculty. [DW]