Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T04:18:26.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Erratum: The Mine Ban Treaty, New Diplomacy and Human Security Ten Years Later

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Javier Alcalde Villacampa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
European Political Science , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 2009, pp. 504
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 European Consortium for Political Research.

Correction to: European Political Science (2008) 7(4), 519–529. doi:10.1057/eps.2008.30

The author apologises for the omitted reference and incorrectly phrased sentence that appears on page 521:

‘Indeed, in any ideal new diplomacy process, there is a facilitating condition that reduces transaction costs: the shared background of key individuals in policy-making positions and NGO activists, which enables communication between the two sides of the like-minded coalition. Sometimes, this is made possible by the opening of positions within a government to former NGO members’.

This sentence should have been correctly written as

‘Indeed, in any ideal new diplomacy process, there is an enabling condition that reduces transaction costs: “the shared background of key individuals in policy-making positions and NGO activists facilitate[s] communication between the two sides of the like-minded coalition … [which sometimes is] made possible by the opening of government positions to former NGO members”. (Petrova, 2007:19)’

References

Note

The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/eps.2008.30