Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T05:07:19.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orange juice industry by-product silage can increase fat and protein in Holstein cow's milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2020

Luís Carlos Vinhas Ítavo*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso de Sul, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia – FAMEZ/UFMS, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
Noemila Débora Kozerski
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso de Sul, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia – FAMEZ/UFMS, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira Ítavo
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso de Sul, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia – FAMEZ/UFMS, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
Alexandre Menezes Dias
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso de Sul, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia – FAMEZ/UFMS, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
Hélène Veronique Petit
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Quebec, Canada
Chaouki Benchaar
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Quebec, Canada
Tadeu Vinhas Voltolini
Affiliation:
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Semi-Árido, Petrolina, PE, Brazil
Cloves Cabreira Jobim
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia – DZO/UEM, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Geraldo Tadeu dos Santos
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia – DZO/UEM, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Luis Carlos Vinhas Itavo, Email: luis.itavo@ufms.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the effect of replacing corn silage by orange peel silage on nutrient intake, ruminal parameters and milk production of multiparous lactating Holstein cows. Eight fistulated Holstein cows averaging 587.5 ± 39.6 kg and 111 ± 22 d in milking were randomly assigned to a double 4 × 4 Latin square design carried out two times to determine the effects of feeding with orange peel silage (OPS) in substitution of whole plant corn silage (WPCS). The treatments were a control diet with WPCS only or diets with OPS replacing WPCS in the total mixed diet (250, 500, or 750 g/kg DM). All cows were fed the same 750 : 250 g/kg roughage : concentrate ratio. The DM intake and milk production were reduced with the OPS inclusion, with decreases in consumption of neutral detergent fibre and increased consumption of non-fibrous carbohydrates. Diets with 250 and 500 g/kg OPS showed similar milk production and protein content in milk to the standard WCPS diet, whilst 750 g/kg orange peel silage as roughage increased fat and protein contents significantly. The orange peel silage as a substitute for corn silage for feeding dairy cows did not show adverse changes in the rumen environment and showed promising results in the increase of fat in milk of Holstein cows.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation
Figure 0

Table 1. Nutrient intake, milk production and composition averages and regression equations adjusted in function of the replacement level (RL) of orange peel silage in replacement of corn silage

Figure 1

Table 2. Averages of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and neutral detergent fibre (aNDF) ruminal degradation parameters (a, b and c) and effective degradability (EfD)

Figure 2

Table 3. Values and regression equations adjusted for ruminal pH and Ammonia-N in function of collection time (t), for replacement levels (RL) of DM corn silage by orange peel silage

Figure 3

Table 4. Average of Volatile fat acids production (Y in mol/d) and relationships between volatile fat acids results with total VFA, in ruminal fluid of cows fed with diets containing Replacement levels (RL) of DM corn silage by orange peel silage

Supplementary material: PDF

Ítavo et al. supplementary material

Ítavo et al. supplementary material

Download Ítavo et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 166.3 KB