Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T07:12:04.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of a vortex in a strongly stratified shear flow. Part 1. Asymptotic analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2020

Julien Bonnici
Affiliation:
LadHyX, CNRS, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau CEDEX, France
Paul Billant*
Affiliation:
LadHyX, CNRS, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau CEDEX, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: billant@ladhyx.polytechnique.fr

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of an initially vertical vortex embedded in a shear flow in a stratified fluid by means of a long-wavelength analysis. The main goal is to determine, whether or not, the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability can develop unconditionally as speculated by Lilly (J. Atmos. Sci., vol. 40, 1983, pp. 749–761). The analysis is performed in the case of the Lamb–Oseen vortex profile and a shear flow uniform in the horizontal and varying sinusoidally along the vertical using the assumption $\hat{k}_{z}a_{0}F_{h}\ll 1$, where $\hat{k}_{z}$ is the vertical wavenumber, $a_{0}$ the vortex radius and $F_{h}$ the horizontal Froude number based on the circulation of the vortex. The results show that the vortex axis is advected not only in the direction of the shear flow but also in the perpendicular direction owing to the self-induced motion of the vortex. In addition, internal waves are transiently excited at the beginning, generating an initial non-hydrostatic regime. Their relative effects on the displacements of the vortex axis are weak except initially. The angular velocity of the vortex decays owing to a dynamic effect and viscous effects related to the vertical shear. The former effect is due to the squeezing of isopycnals in the vortex core, which implies a decrease of the vertical vorticity to satisfy potential vorticity conservation. In addition, a horizontal velocity field with an azimuthal wavenumber $m=2$ is generated, meaning that the shape of the vortex becomes slightly elliptical. We further show that the minimum asymptotic Richardson number is bounded, $\min (Ri)>3.43$, when $\hat{k}_{z}a_{0}F_{h}\ll 1$ and therefore cannot go below the critical value $1/4$. This is because the growth of the vertical shear of the horizontal velocity of the vortex saturates owing to the decay of its angular velocity and because the squeezing of isopycnals increases the stratification strength. This suggests that the shear instability cannot always develop in strongly stratified flows, contrary to the conjecture of Lilly (as above). These predictions will be tested against direct numerical simulations in Part 2.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1.(a) Sketch of the flow configuration studied in this paper. The ambient shear flow $U(z)\boldsymbol{e}_{x}$ is represented by the black vectors. The dark grey (red) and light grey (yellow) contours show two levels of the potential vorticity of the vortex at $t=0$. (b) Potential vorticity contours at $t=20$ obtained from a direct numerical simulation for the Froude and Reynolds numbers $F_{h}=0.1$, $Re=6000$ and the shear flow $U=U_{S}\sin (k_{z}z)$ with $U_{S}=0.2$ and $k_{z}=\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}$. These parameters are defined in § 2. See Billant & Bonnici (2020) for the details of the numerical simulations.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Streamfunctions (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{wc}$ and (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{ws}$ plotted against $\tilde{r}$ at $t=0$ (grey solid line), $t=4$ (black dash-dotted line), $t=8$ (black dashed line) and $t=16$ (black solid line), at $z=l_{z}/4$, where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=[1-\exp (-\tilde{r}^{2})]/\tilde{r}^{2}$ regardless of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}$. The Froude number is $F_{h}=0.1$. (c) Streamfunctions $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}}_{2b}/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}_{2}\bar{r}^{2})$ (solid line), $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}}_{2s}/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{2}\bar{r}^{2})$ (dashed line), $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}}_{2c}/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{2}\bar{r}^{2})$ (dash-dotted line) and $\bar{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}}_{2s}^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}/(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}_{2}^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}}\bar{r}^{2})$ (dotted line) computed in appendix D.

Figure 2

Figure 3.(a) Variables ${\mathcal{A}}$ (solid line) and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D717}$ (dashed line) plotted against $F_{h}$, at the vertical level $z=l_{z}/4$, where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}=[1-\exp (-\tilde{r}^{2})]/\tilde{r}^{2}$ regardless of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}$. (b,c) Forcings ${\mathcal{C}}_{w}$ (grey lines) and ${\mathcal{S}}_{w}$ (black lines) for (b) $F_{h}=0.1$ and (c) $F_{h}=0.5$, at $z=l_{z}/4$.

Figure 3

Figure 4.Lines of constant total buoyancy $b_{t}$ near the point $x=0$, $z=l_{z}/2$ at $t=0$ (grey dashed lines) and $t=t_{0}$ (grey solid lines). The bold black solid line represents the vortex axis at $t=t_{0}$. Here $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}h$ is the height variation at $x=0$ of the iso-buoyancy line located at $z=h+l_{z}/2$ initially.

Figure 4

Figure 5.(a,b) Angular velocity profile $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}$ as a function of $\tilde{r}$ computed numerically from (4.6) (black solid lines) and predicted by (4.7) (grey circles) at different times for (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}=0.1$ and (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}=1$. The Lamb–Oseen profile (4.11) is also represented by red dash-dotted lines. The times shown are (a) $\tilde{t}=0$, $\tilde{t}=2.65$, $\tilde{t}=7.50$, $\tilde{t}=13.8$, $\tilde{t}=21.2$ and (b) $\tilde{t}=0$, $\tilde{t}=0.265$, $\tilde{t}=0.750$, $\tilde{t}=1.38$, $\tilde{t}=2.12$, from top to bottom. (c) Evolution of the angular velocity at the vortex centre $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}_{c}$ as a function of $\tilde{t}^{1/3}=F_{h}t|\text{d}U/\text{d}z|$ predicted by (4.10) (grey circles) and computed numerically from (4.6) (black solid lines) for $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}=0.1$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}=1$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}=10$ (top to bottom). The red dash-dotted lines represent the numerical integration of the full equation (4.1) for $F_{h}=0.5$, $k_{z}=1$ and $U_{S}=0.2$.

Figure 5

Figure 6.Evolution of (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x2202}u_{c}/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}z$ (grey lines) and $\unicode[STIX]{x2202}v_{c}/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}z$ (black lines), (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x2202}b/\unicode[STIX]{x2202}z$ and (c) $Ri_{c}$ predicted by (4.29), (4.30) and (4.32) for $F_{h}=0.1$, $k_{z}=2$, $U_{S}=0.2$ and for $Re=6000$ (solid lines) and $Re=\infty$ (dash-dotted lines). The dashed lines represent the predictions from the approximations (4.33), (4.34), (4.35) and (4.36).